|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Fairy Map of Succession |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When the mirror told her that Snow-White was
more beautiful than her, the queen mother ...became pale with
envy, and from that hour on, she hated
Snow-White. She could then only think about
killing her, about getting back her supremacy, but in
the end she had to die, while dancing at the wedding of
Snow-White and her prince. Between tragedy and everyday life, the fairy-tales offer a free area, where all can enter without any licence; be they scholars or illiterates, Eastern or Western people, citizens of the south and of the north of the world, children, grown-ups and old people. All of them have the same competence and the same right to listen to and tell a fairy-tale. Fairy-tales present an extreme risk: succumbing before growing up. But they also represent a chance to escape a mortal danger and reach a happy ending. This happy ending is not realistic, it is simply true. Let us think, for example, of the relief - at least of the spontaeous smile - that Snow-White gives us when she opens her eyes and sees - together with us - her enamoured prince and the happy seven dwarves. We can also imagine Cinderella finally dancing with her Prince Charming, while the stepsisters and all the guests move to the background to give them room in the palace. If the shapes of the generational conflict
are countless, why does Fabulando give ten of them? Our
wish is not to build up any kind of catalogue, or to fix
a new kind of classification. We only arranged ten
moulds, to place the Sixty-seven fairy tales of our
collection. We are simply offering a map,
The Fairy Map of Succession. Let us now look
together at the Fairy Map of Succession. In the lower
part, we see the sea that represents the maternal side,
because the south includes half of the fairy tales of
the map which feature an injunction coming from the
maternal actant. The north half of the map, with the
mountains that represent the side of the father,
includes fairy tales which start with a paternal
injunction. If the main actant is a female, the tales
are in the west side of the map, whilst the fairy tales
are in the east side if their main actant is a male. The
symbol of the female filial actant is the moon; that of
the filial male actant is the sun. The Map
presents ten symbols of Parental
Injunctions, which may be only in one quadrant, in
two, in three, or in all quadrants. Under every symbol
of the injunctions, there is the title of a fairy tale
that is the head of the list for that injunction in that
quadrant. With a click or a touch on each symbol or
title, we open the Map of the fairy tale. Let us now look
at a Map of the fairy tale. If for example, on
the Fairy Map of Succession, we choose with a
click or a touch in the southeast quadrant the Peak
of the Impossible Task - Frog,
Frog - we open the following Map of the
tale. At the center of this map there is an image
of the fairy tale. By clicking or
touching this image, we get the e-book
of the tale. Under the
section of the injunction, we see the Northeast
Quadrant, to which our fairy tale Frog, Frog belongs. By
clicking or touching this image, we get the Map of
the Quadrant. From this map we can get the maps
of all the fairy tales belonging to the northeast
quadrant. The lower left
section leads to the Fabulando
Fairy Tours, which are itineraries we offer
to visit the fairy tales of Fabulando. Every tale is told with an e-book, and some tales are told also through other digital media: e-kamishibai - a digital version of the Japanese paper theater or kamishibai - movie and history of the fairy tale. The map of The Frog Prince, for example, includes all the kinds of storytelling included in Fabulando. We can get them clicking or touching the relevant captions. (AG & CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.
Actants |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The fairy tale
always tells the story of a filial actant, because it
tells how it is possible to grow up. Growth is not
limited to childhood and adolescence, as it is always
possible; whenever we learn something we feel more
adult, regardless of our age. The
main actant is a young one, playing a filial role with
the old or young actants that he/she meets during
his/her journey. This is an experience of human growth.
The reader and the listener may be seven or seventy
years old, but they will regardless all identify with
the young. We would now
like to point out the difference between fairy tales
with a female main actant and fairy tales with a male
main actant, examining two tales starting with the same
injunction, acted by the same parental actant, Sleeping Beauty in the
Wood and Pig King. These
tales begin with the injunction Sailing
Ship of the Black Curse, and the curse comes
from a female parental actant. The female main actant of
the first tale is the world-famous princess who falls
into a death-like sleep, the male main actant of the
second tale is a prince that is a pig from birth. The
events of these tales are quite different, as are the
paths of these main actants. The first difference lies
in the effect produced on the protagonists by the
maternal actant. Changing
injunction and parental actant, we now examine two fairy
tales belonging to The
Fortress of Solitude: Sweet Diamond Pie and The Raven. Betta,
female main actant of the first tale, and Milluccio,
male main actant of the second one, do not want to marry
anybody. Betta decides to make herself a man with sugar,
almonds and rosewater, while Milluccio falls in love
with an ideal woman that cannot be found. The beautiful
husband of Betta soon leaves her for a foreign queen,
and the tale tells of Betta's long journey to find him.
In the tale The Raven, the
younger brother of King Milluccio leaves to find his
brother's ideal bride, and finds her at the mid-point of
the tale. These two actants have to face many hard
trials to get their happy ending. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Parental Injunctions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An injunction is a final order, a hindrance that someone, who has the power to do it, imposes on another, who cannot escape. We defined “parental” the injunctions of the fairy tales given in Fabulando, to say that the parental actants impose them on the filial actants, as a task, an exile, or a sentence. The injunction begins the fairy tale and entails a reaction of the main actants, who have to move themselves. So, they begin their journey, which is often lengthy and sprinkled with mortal dangers, towards the happy ending. When her step-mother orders beautiful Caterina (The Mammone Cat) to go and see the dangerous fairies and ask them a sieve, she imposes on her an Impossible Task, namely to survive the encounter with magic powerful figures. Then the girl must go, and facing the danger her own nature emerges. This gives her the chance to grow up. When his father turns Nardiello out of the house (The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket), he imposes on and exiles him. The main actant has to live a destitute life, far from family protection. Nonetheless, travelling alone with his little magic animals, he can meet the princess Milla, care her from melancholy and marry her. The injunctions of Fabulando that distinguish fairy tales are ten, and they are represented by a symbol. They all find their own place in the Fairy Map of Succession. Four of them figure in all quadrants: the Forest of the Exile, the Marsh of the Dereliction, the Peak of the Impossible Task and the Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment. One of them figure in three quadrants: the Fork of the Possible Task. Three injunctions are in two quadrants: the Fortress of Solitude, the Sailing Ship of the Black Curse, and the Gibbet of the Death Sentence. Two of them eventually figure only in one quadrant: the Tower of the Segregation and the Castle of the Forced Love. Each injunction includes more fairy tales. To the north of the Fairy Map of Succession we positioned the injunctions imposed by the father figure, to the south those imposed by the mother figure. Below each symbol there are two captions, the first gives the name of the injunction, the second gives the title of the fairy tale that we chose to represent that injunction in that quadrant. By a click or a touch on the symbol, you open the map of that fairy tale, and then you can focus on that tale or go on exploring the fairy tales starting with that injunction, by a click or a touch on its own symbol, which is in the lower left of each Map of the Fairy Tale. The Maps of the Injunctions include in their turn the division in quadrants of their own fairy tales, so that you can see at a glance the distribution of the fairy tales of the Gibbet of the Death Sentence, of the Forest of the Exile, of the Sailing Ship of the Black Curse, etc. Crossing injunctions and quadrants you get a tool to travel in Fabulando without getting lost: everywhere you can know where you are according to the main map, the Fairy Map of Succession. Moreover, you always get clear symbols recalling the meanings of the path you are following. If you choose the path of a single injunction, you can explore its feminine and masculine articulation; if you try the area of a quadrant, walking through its different injunctions, you can see how many questions come from a female or male main actant, facing a male or female parental actant. As well as everyday life, fairy-tale world gives countless ties and connections, and the risk to get lost in stories is very high, leading to the painful feeling of going around without any sense. Facing the injunction of our Impossible Commitment to give life to Fabulando, we tried to enable you to walk along fairy tale’s sensible paths getting your position wherever you find yourself, just following your love for fairy tales. We welcome you, be your level of knowledge of this subject high or low. If then you happen to get lost, there is no harm: wherever you are, look at the icon of the Fairy Map of Succession, click or touch it to get back the starting point and try a new way. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peak of the Impossible Task |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The fairy tale Mammone Cat tells of a stepmother who sends the beautiful Caterina to the fairies hoping that they will make her ugly. Caterina, weeping, sets out alone, and along the way she meets an old ragamuffin. She tells him her story and listens to him, who teaches her how to behave with the fairies. These are not the kind of instructions given by the parental actant in the tales of the Fork of the Possible Task. They make possible a kind of initiation, leaving Caterina free to act on them. In Solver of Riddles, Solve this Riddle, a marquis promises to grant freedom to a prisoner if someone will ask him a riddle that he cannot solve. The main female actant wins the test and her father is pardoned. The enigma concerns the ambiguity of language, its polysemy. This marquis, like Turandot, understands that there are riddles that he cannot solve, while he had previously been sure of being able to master them without any limit. Three princes are tasked by their father king with finding the water that can cure his blindness (The Marmotta Queen). In another fairy tale a king gives his three princes the task of finding a wife by rolling three golden balls (Frog, Frog). In the first tale, the elder brothers interrupt their journey without finding the magic water for their father, while Andreino, the youngest prince, fulfills his task. The slander of his envious brothers endangers his life, but they cannot overcome him in the end. In Frog, Frog, the elder brothers get two beautiful girls, but Nicolino, the youngest one, finds only a frog in the ditch where his golden ball fell. Without doubting his task, he is sad but ready to marry a frog, when the animal turns herself into a princess. The youngest brother fulfils his impossible task and finally ascends to the throne together with his beautiful wife. The Dying Fairy's Will gives us the chance to see that two fairy tales beginning with different injunctions can have the same plot. In this tale, starting with the Peak of the Impossible Task, a son promises his dying fairy mother to give his three sisters in marriage to the first three passers-by. He grudgingly executes her will, then an old hag bewitches him, so that he must find Bella Margarita. In the tale Three Animal Kings, beginning with the injunction of the Labyrint of the Impossible Commitment, the prince chooses to leave to find his sister, who had been abducted by three animal kings, while his parents try to hold him back. Well, his journey is nearly the same as that of the main actant of the other tale, and leads all the young actants to the same happy ending. The three bewitched husbands of the main actant’s sisters turn back into handsome kings and the main male actant overcomes the ogre who had imprisoned Bella Margarita and marries her. Four young couples come back to their four kingdoms, where their parents were mourning the loss of their heirs, so that the young princes and princesses ascend to their respective thrones and live happily ever after. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Labyrinth of the Impossible
Commitment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the fairy
tale The Seven
Little Pigeons, there is the same
separation between male and female descendants, but here
it is a daughter who sets off to look for her seven lost
brothers, and goes on a wonderful but hard journey.
After many vicissitudes, the sister comes back home
together with her brothers, and they bring home riches
just as like Hänsel e
Gretel did. The main actants of Violet and The Golden Eagle do not follow any injunction but their desire, and they act with the determination of any actant who chooses an impossible commitment. Violet fills the gap between herself and the king’s son, who had tried to capture her. Arrighetto, main actant of The Golden Eagle, son of the emperor of the Magna (Germany), falls in love with the daughter of his father' main enemy, the King of Raona (Aragon). After a realistic European war between the two enemies and all their allies, peace finally comes, and the kings bless the union of their male and female descendants. The
folktale Smithy Menico
begins with the impossible wish par excellence, which
a poor but cunning smith can express and fulfil thanks
to three magic gifts. The donor here is Jesus, with
St. Peter as his assistant, who grants Smithy Menico
three wishes. The main actant does not
ask for wealth or other goods, but for something
that will give him the power to cheat Death and the
Devil. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fork of
the Possible Task |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This injunction include three fairy tales of our collection, Dauntless Little John, Thus Ended the Idiot and Red Riding Hood. The third tale is better known in a version that ends happily, while ours, by Perrault, is the first version ever published, which ends with the wolf successfully devouring the main actant and her granny. The task of Little John looks easy, because the main actant is dauntless and looks able to overcome every hurdle; his life looks easy because nobody engages him with a task. Red Riding Hood and the Idiot have an ordinary simple task to complete; the girl has to visit her grandmother and bring her something to eat, the poor Idiot has to go to the miller with some wheat and come back with the flour. These are possible task, if we liken it to other fairy tale's tasks; let us remember, for example, Snow White, who has to survive to her killer mother. We could think also of the main actant in the tale The Seven Little Pigeons, who has to reach the House of Time, becouse only Time knows the secret to turn back her seven pigeon brothers into human beings. It is a paradox that the possible tasks drive the main actants to death, while the impossible tasks drive them to the happy ending. Looking at this injunction, we think of a parent's current bent. Parents and teachers often try to hide away death, pain and serious illness, as if they could protect children from the hard reality. They do not protect children, but their own narcissism, which refuses this tragic experience. Children know very soon the existence of death, illness and pain, if they cannot speak about it with their parents, they are going to think that their knowledge is illicit, as if they were heretics in their church-family. Children can othewise think that their parents are so afraid that it is better not to speak with them about these tragic issues. Children will however be lonely in their experience of the tragic side of life, while it is necessary to understand it and know its risks. An elaboration is needed, and it is possible only if these issues take place in the field of education, by a speech or a fairy tale that can tie them with others issues. A fork represents the injunction of the Possible Task, because the main actants here think to have an easy and right way to complete their task as if they should not think by themselves. They never complete the task, because the only way to try a free path is missing the task assigned by their parents. If the parents think to be able to protect their children forever, they give them only the chance to break their law or to miss their task. When children grow up, they need to understand their own desire; if they have no desire but their parent's one, they cannot choose their own path. Moreover, they do not know the risk and they do not learn how to deal with it. In these fairy tales, this set drives to an unhappy ending. In the popular version of Red Riding Hood, she and her grandmother live again thanks to the hunter, a paternal actant who has a knife and a gun, able to get food from the wood. This later happy end means the restoration of the initial situation, a kind of second birth realised by the hunter father. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forest
of the Exile |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The other three fairy tales beginning with this injunction have male main actants and a happy ending, as well as Flower and Flowerstem. The maternal actant exiles the female main actant because of her beauty, as well as maternal actants sentence Snow White to death and segregate Cinderella. Parental actants force the male main actants of our three tales of the Forest of the Exile because of their ineptitude. His father chases away and delegitimizes little John because he is looking for fear and the goose bump instead of learning a trade (Little John and the Shudder). The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket tells how the father of Nardiello tries to teach him to become a merchant, but Nardiello wastes huge amounts of money so that he has finally to run away to escape his father beating him to death. The mother and the sisters of Dumbtony, in The Tale of the Ogre, are very poor, while he is a stupid layabout; when his exasperated mother beats him to death, he runs away. Dumbtony does not understand ambiguity in language, as well as the main character in Così finì il Tonto, nevertheless he may get chance to learn from his experience. Looking at these three fairy tales of the Forest of the Exile, we can state a kind of rule, each time parents throw out their son, this youth can find his way to grow up and get a happy ending. Another kind of rule says that if the main male actant in a fairy tale is unable to provide for himself and damages his family, he must move away from his origin to grow up and survive, and even get a happy ending. The ineptitude of the main male actant means a failure of his education, however the tale does not tell anything about this failure's reasons. It only tells that the parents acknowledge it and stop looking for a remedy, allowing their son to leave or forcing him to go through the world, so that he may learn from his experience what he could not learn from them. The bond between parents and sons - or daughters - is so strong that without continuance solutions they become so hardly attached to each other that they risk to falling into a tragic area. The death of the main actants in the fairy tales beginning with the injunction Fork of the Possible Task represents this tragic area. Anothe kind of tale, the Parable of the Prodigal Son, tells of the youngest son who had claimed his share to leave his father's house (Luca, 15, 11-32). His father divided his property between his children and let him go, without both asking him for any explanation and giving him any advice. The minor son squandered his riches and became a servant who suffered even hunger. Then he decided to go back to his father to ask him to welcome him as one of his servants, but his father, as soon as he saw him, took him into his arms and had a celebration for him. Even on this occasion, the father did not ask him or tell any explanation. Educating is
one of the three task that Freud defined impossible;
nevertheless, it is impossible to stop doing it. The
father of the parable, even quite different from the
parents of the three male actants of the Forest of
the Exile, behaves as a parent who knows that
becoming adult entails a tremendous freedom that no
educator can master. If parents take too much care of
their ideal image, their narcissism prevents them from
accepting their own limits. If they can bear the
narcissistic wound that every son or daughter can
inflict on their parents, they get the chance to grow
together with their descendents. Thinking again of the
parable we quoted, if the father is God, it tells that
not even the Creator can save a man against his will. To
try to do better than Father God is a dangerous madness,
often masqued by unlimited love, both by believers and
non-believers. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marsh
of the Dereliction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As soon as the dereliction is told, these stories tell that into this stage there is however something that looks unuseful, like a cat, a doll or a speaking fish. But it can help the derelict actants to leave their mash and find a way to become even a king or a queen. The perception of our dereliction is common, but the way that these actants choose to follow their wish for a doll, or to listen to a cat or a fish, is not easy. To get their beloved doll, the main female actants of The Lost Doll and Pooavola Doll give up everything, and faithfully following their desire, they make possible their story and their happy ending. Madmatt and the future Marquis de Carabas (Puss in Boots and Master Cat or Puss in Boots) are hungry, and they would fill them up with their inherited cat or the fish they finally caught. Nevertheless, they listen to them, even if it looks impossible that those animals could change their fate. Hope and desire go together, as well as despair and lack of desire; and these stories tell how the first pair can work. Nevertheless, it is almost impossible to give up the satisfaction of an urgent need of ours, which commands us by the tyranny of our symptoms, because following our desire means being ready to risk everything. The feeling of our terrible dereliction can stop our desire even from whispering something, because the dereliction is quite certain, while desire is lacking of any guarantee. Let us now
remember that fairy tales do not tell that following our
desire we leave the mash and become queens and kings;
they just tell that following it, listening to the faint
voice that invites us to do it, is the only way to make
it possible. The border between a childish certainty and
a grown-up uncertainty presents itself every day, but we
seldom acknowledge it. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tower
of the Segregation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walt Disney
introduced a tower (of the Segregation) into
his version of Cinderella
(US 1950), to increase the isolation of its beloved main
female actant and the oppressiveness of her stepmother.
Another tower, with just a little window, has
characterized the tale of Parsley
since its first version (Basile,
1634-1636). Each injunction we chose to order our fairy tales in the Fairy Map of Succession, may be thought of as a constraint (French: contraint). Fabulando follows a model for growing up that would be impossible without a constraint. The constraint of metrics and a fixed rhyme scheme is the narrow way through which poetry and poems come, as well as the tower's only little window is the passage for Parsley to set off and for her prince to come in. In the last wonderful version of Cinderella directed by Kennet Branagh (US 2015) the song of the prisoner comes out from the highest little window of the tower, and her king does not need to find her any more. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sailing
Ship of the Black Curse |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the east and west sea of the Map of Succession, the Sailing Ship of the Black Curse sails, missing from the paternal north quadrants of the map, as well as the Gibbet of the Death Sentence. The maternal quadrants is the sole agent for the most cruel injunctions, as if the mothers would be more dangerous than fathers for their growing children. It seems that fairy tales confirm the millennial tradition that looks at the woman as diaboli janua (devil’s door) and legis prima desertrix (law’s first deserter), from Eve with the snake. The women’s inferiority would depend on their being deriving from the man, while the man derived from God. Nevertheless, it is told that God created the world by his word, but He took something from Mother Earth to create Adam. This male priority entailed the generative power, because up to the 18th century scientist told that the homuncula lived in the sperm, whose name is in fact semen, while the woman had to nourish and grow the new creature (see also: Storytelling and Science). Nevertheless, the woman can become a superior creature if she lives just for her husband and children; like the Madonna, who has no stain of sin and has never leaded a man into temptation. There are more churches dedicated to the Madonna than to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Let us give a look to the Paleolithic Venus figurines, the first representations of human beings. Their bodies’ parts linked with sex and procreation are emphasized and realistic – breast, womb, buttocks and thighs –, while their face has no features and their forearms are missing, as well as and the lower part of their legs. From these feminine bodies the Paleolithic sculptors removed facial expression - therefore the speech -, feet - the autonomous movement - hands - the independent ability to relate. The woman should then stop and receive, like earth from the sewer. Che la piasa, che la tasa e che la staga in casa (Be she pleasant, be she silent, and stay she at home) still says a saying from the Veneto. The Sailing Ship of the Black Curse and the Gibbet of the Death Sentence are only on the south quadrants of the map because they concern the feminine as earth. Males can penetrate it and reap its fruits, without knowing its mysterious deepness. The mythic image of women since the Old Stone Age veils and unveils the unknown, and it's right and duty of men to stop and to fear this odd mystery. Therefore, women hold the threatening unknown, darkness and death. So the menstrual blood can be a taboo, and many women are still veiled and segregated. If women hold the extreme evil, they could consequently act it with dreadful effects. This mythic truth is still told by some ecology movements; Mother Earth will sentence humankind to death, because men outraged and poisoned her with their overbearing civilization. If this story were one of our fairy tales, we would place it in the southeast quadrant, and it should belongs to the injunction of the Sailing Ship of the Black Curse o to the Gibbet of the Death Sentence, together with the story of Avatar (James Cameron, US 2009). Let us now mention something about the ending of this film that has told its story all over the world. Jake Sully, the male main actant, saves himself turning into a Na’vi, a thin blue creature that might be more fine and good than the guilty man. The Earth, which is our only realm, is dying, and on Pandora just two male human beings survive. The chain of human generations stops forever in this almost unhappy dystopian ending. The archaic
feminine of the vindictive Mother Earth is still in
force, but it does not belong to the female actants more
than to the male ones. In fact, the fairy-tale curse and
the warrant coming from the parental female actant hit
both sons and daughters. The actants undergo these
injunctions to free themselves from the power of this
archaic mother and reach the field of speech. This
difficult movement is a precondition to grow up. We then
think of the Sailing Ship of the Black Curse and
the Gibbet of the Death Sentence,
as to paradoxical expressions, telling by hints
something whose features are inexpressible. It has no
words or expressions, like the Paleolithic Venus
figurines, and the stories telling the drama of a
subject who is imprisoned in this field are easily
misunderstood. We should remember that they stage by
words something escaping from the speech, like a
psychosomatic illness. Many years after her delivery, it
happensa that a mother has not have completely delivered
her child, as if she would still keep parts of her
children’s body - and mind. These female and male young
actants - these sons and daughters - cannot really grow,
since a part of them is still in her dumb womb.The
stories beginning with the Sailing Ship of
the Black Curse tell something about this
condition. The queen of Pig King becomes pregnant thanks to three fairies, which make her beautiful and inviolable, but they decide that this perfect queen will give birth to a pig baby. Life can flow even through her magic pregnancy and her acceptance of her animal baby. The Pig King turns into a handsome human youth thank to a wife who tenderly loves him as a pig too. Nevertheless, he forbids her to tell his parents that he is a man by night. His metamorphosis becomes irreversible after the birth of a human baby, when finally his royal parents learn of the human nature of their son. So, life flows again in the realm, now free from the strictness of the ideal. In Sleeping Beauty in the Wood, the curse comes from an old fairy, who takes her revenge because the father king had forgot her. She has the same power of Athropos, the Greek Moira who cut the thread of the human life; nevertheless in the fairy tale it is always possible to mitigate such a sentence. The newborn princess will not die, but sleep for a century, together with all the dwellers of the castle. In the Greek mythology a human being betraying an oath was condemned to death. And if a god or a goddess did the same, they had to spend a long time sleeping like Beauty in the wood. Zeus appointed for Styx, goddess of the underground freezing river, the great oath of the gods. We remember this ancient myth because it brings us back to our fairy tales, since Styx means shudder, the unheimliche feeling that Dauntless Little John ignored, while another Little John missed and looked for it (Little John and the Shudder). Another fairy
tale in this section is a gorgeous Sicilian story, Misfortune. The curse of
the female main actant depends on the nature of her
Fate, a popular sister of the mythic Moirai or Norns,
Latin Parcae. Her mother queen asks her daughter
Misfortune to set off, in order to take her curse away
from their house. European fairy tales have many
precedents in the ancient literature, and they probably
have had a long oral transmission, but their certain
birth occurred in the 16th century, when Giovan
Francesco Straparola published some fairy
tales among the novellas of his collection, The
Facetious Nights. The modernity of fairy tales
entails actants that represent modern subjects,
individually acting, able to become free from parental
authorities, to face their injunctions and follow the
law of their desire to get their own aims. This Sicilian
fairy tale gives us one of the best images of this
chance, when Sfurtuna meets Gna
Francisca (gna means signora,
madam), who is the washerwoman of the king. Since when
she had left her house, Sfurtuna was followed and
damaged by her Fate, which leaves her now in peace, to
wash, dry, mend, iron and starch the king’s clothes
together with Gnà Francisca. The king is very pleased
and gives more money to his washerwoman, who buys
garments and rouges for Sfurtuna and her Fate, and
ingredients to prepare some cakes. Then she sends
Fortuna to offer these cakes to her Fate, who first
refuses them, being an unpleasant ugly ragamuffin.
Sfurtuna gives her some cakes and as soon as she can
approach her, then grabs her, washes, combs her and
dresses her with new clothes. Then Sfortuna’s bad Fate
turns into a good Fate, and finally the main actant
becomes a queen. My patients
suffering from anorexic and/or bulimic diseases find
significative and fruitful some motifs belonging to the
fairy tales that begin with the injunction of the Sailing Ship of the Black Curse
and the Gibbet of the Death
Sentence. If we had no word or story to tie
something imprisoned in a no-name place, we could
never hope to take care of this kind of diseases. We
have nothing but words, stories, and the
psychoanalytic theories - Wittgenstein defined
psychoanalysis a powerful mythology.
Nevertheless, something favourable happens, if we
remember that our instruments, words and stories, are
false or fabulous hooks and baits, by which we can fish
some true fish (I paraphrase here Freud
[Constructions in Analysis SE 23, p. 262] who
quoted Shakespeare: Your bait of falsehood takes
this carp of truth - Hamlet, Act II Scene I, v.
61]). Neither a submarine nor a Delian diver could see
the carps and the aquatic monsters in their
element; moreover, we can only hypothesize the existence
of this inaccessible reality, the unconscious, being
unable to demonstrate it. Then it has not a stuff more
real than dreams and stories, where fairies and fates
dwell. Nobody could
organize a journey to go there, but we can imagine that
journey, and in our mind we can, so to say, nourish,
clean and dress again our fate. This would not be a real
journey, but there is no movement without hope, and the
thought and emotions move themselves by fantasy and
imagination. This movement can move a new desire an open
a walled up door, and the invisible journey has visible
effects. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gibbet of the Death Sentence |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To be born, to live, to die: three immortal sisters managed the thread of human life in ancient Greek mythology; the first drew the thread of life, the second spun it, and the third cut it. Their Greek name is Moirai, Latins called them Parcae. Not even Zeus could change the destiny spun and cut by Fates, and from the Latin word fatum, plural fata, comes the Italian fata, French fée, English fairy (from Old French faerie). Our fate is not in the hands of Zeus or in the hands of our parents. While we are running away, we can meet a helper fairy, or an old woman, or a house with seven little beds. Beyond the family world, that is the matrix of our life, there is a world where we enter taking a risk, to find a shelter, to receive a magic hazelnut. Life is greater than the laces that tie and imprison us to our story; the knots may be untied, even if they are tight and tangled. If Snow White made it, we too can hope to overcome our hindrances. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fortress
of Solitude |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the injunction Castle of the Forced Love the bond between father and daughter is so strong that there is a threatening or disgusting husband. In the tales of the Fortress of Solitude the parental actants may be lacking, not even mentioned – The Raven and The White Ricotta –, there is just a paternal actant who fruitlessly proposes to get married to his only daughter – Sweet Diamond Pie -, or his only son. So begins also the fairy tale The Three Citrons, written by Basile in 1734-36, who became a comedy by Carlo Gozzi in 1761, an opera by Sergej Prokofiev in 1919. The most famous tale beginning with this injunction is Turandot, written in Paris in 1710 by Pétis de La Croix, an orientalist scholar. He knew from Persian Literature the story of the beautiful princess who cuts off the head of her suitors who try her test and fail. Turandot is the last work of Giacomo Puccini, who died in 1924 before completing his Turandot, and the opera's first performance was held in 1926. Like in the fairy tale of Pétis de La Croix, Puccini's Turandot is set in an fabulous China, and in 1998 they staged this opera in the Forbidden City of Peking, as if the frosty princess had finally came back home. Fairy tales give birth to other fairy tales, nourishing imagination and dreams. In the tale of Sweet Diamond Pie, the daughter of a merchant decides to make a husband to her taste and asks her father to bring her half a hundredweight of Palermo sugar, four or six bottles of scented water, spices and gems. She makes her creature, loves her ideal man and asks gods to give him life, remembering what happened to the Greek sculptor Pygmalion with his statue of Galatea. With the approval of her astonished father, she marries her Sweet Diamond Pie, but a queen steals him and she has to set off to find him again. Her journey to get back her lost beloved has its prototype in the pilgrimage of Psyche abandoned by Amor in the tale of Apuleius, and recurs in the popular versions of Pig King (see also: Il Re Porco e Amore e Psiche, website Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole). The Raven, like The White Ricotta
that is one of its popular versions, is a cruel and
bloody fascinating fairy tale. The main male actant is a
king that reigns without any limit to his passion for
haunting, so that he neglects his affairs of state.
Refusing to marry, he stops the alternation of
generations, but then he falls in love with an ideal
wife, imagined by him when he sees three colours
togethre: the red blood of a dead raven, the black of
its feathers and the white of a marble stone. There is a
odd reference to death in the white marble, as well as
in the red and black of the raven. The younger brother
of the king sets off to find this ideal bride, but this
search causes his own death. The Grimm Brothers knew well The Tale of Tales by Basile, and the colours of the female main actant of this tale could have given them the colours of Snow White, who has to lie as a dead. Among the most famous fairy-tales female characters, she is the only princess characterized by black hair, and her colours come from her mother’s wish. The queen would a baby as white as snow, as black as the black ebony wood of her window and as red as her blood, which fell into the snow when she pricked her finger with a needle. As well as the main actants of The Raven, the mother queen of Snow White gives life to her daughter and then she tries to kill her. There are
interesting differences between The
Raven and The White Ricotta,
when the king knows that his younger brother has
sacrificed his life to make him happy. In The Raven the
king loves the statue of his brother more than his
babies, and kills them causing a fatal pain to his wife.
Her necromancer father then comes like a deus ex
machina to turn that tragic conclusion into a
happy ending. In the popular Calabrian tale the king
hears her wife’s dragon parents - who now turned into
two pigeons - talking of the mean to give back life to
his brother, giving his babies just a temporary death. This cruel fairy tale presents a king who stopping the flow of generations in the fortress of his solitude, staring at an ideal image, which is then linked to death, while his younger brother lives only to satisfy him. The desire of a new life raids this ideal’s mirror, the same fatal mirror of water that caught Narcissus. The story tells that a very long journey, an abnegation that sacrifices all one’s goods, even life, can cure the main male actant of his attraction for a dead and alive object, like a statue, a fancy or a mirror. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Castle
of the Forced Love |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
With the same injunction starts the type Donkey Skin, whose most famous version was written by Perrault. This story tells of a widower king who promised his dying wife not to marry any woman but beautiful like her. The king sees that his daughter is the only woman right for him, and wants to marry her. But the princess runs away covered with an animal skin, which like a second skin hides her beauty. At the end, she will happily marry a foreign prince. In Fabulando there is also The She-Bear by Basile, which is the first version of this fairy tale, and a folk version, The Tacconelle of Woody Maria. (For the type Donkey Skin, see also two Italian dialectal versions, O dente d'oo, from Liguria, and Maria Intaulata, from Sardinia, website Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole). To this injunction belong popular tales of the type Cordelia, which tell of a king who, like Shakespeare’s King Lear, asks his three daughters to say how much they love him. This type is represented in Fabulando by Rot-Eyes. The actant of this tale is banished by her father because he does not accepts her answer, like King Lear. Cordelia said that she loved her father Lear, but she knew that she will love also the man who will marry her, while her elder sisters had declared a total love for their father. It is interesting to understand how the tragedy and the fairy tale, having the same beginning, have so different endings. (About these tales, see: Marian Roalf Emily Cox, Three Hundred and Forty-five Versions of Cinderella, Catskin and Cap O' Rushes, London 1893; see also Adalinda Gasparini, La Luna nella cenere. Analisi del sogno di Cenerentola, Pelle d’Asino, Cordelia, 1999) In the type of Beauty and the Beast, which is the most popular tale of its type, the main female actant is ready to give her life to save her father. Beauty's father picked a rose for her in the garden of the Beast, who can spare his life just if one of his daughters will come and take her father’s place. The filial actant is ready to die for the parental actant, inverting the natural flow of life. Then the main female actant stops her life, and the tale goes on with the meeting with the monster. The Beast replaces her idealized father and treats Beauty like a queen, melancholically accepting that she cannot love and marry him. An impossible relation between beauty and ugliness follows the ideal relation between father and daughter. Beauty saves her bond with her father accepting to be the prisoner of a repulsive being, while the Beast tries to win Beauty’s love to get free from the curse that made of him a monstrous being. The main actant of this fairy tale is Beauty, since her father acts the injunction, while the Beast lives alone in his castle because of a duress that had happened before the beginning of the tale. When turnsthe Beast finally into a beautiful prince, he reveals that he refused to marry a powerful woman, that is to say a maternal actant, who cursed him; just a girl ready to marry him in spite of his animal shape can save him. In the fairy tale Frog, Frog we see a beautiful princess who finally reveals to the incredulous prince Nicolino that she was just the frog that he thought to marry, Yes, here I am, you have to know that I was under a spell, and I ought to be a frog as long as I could find a boy who would marry me without knowing my beauty. In Fabulando
collection there is a fourth type, an animal - here a
frog - helps the main female actant and asks her to eat
from her little plate and sleep on her pillow: The Frog Prince.
Here the king father orders his daughter to keep her
promise, when the princess does not open the door to the
poor little animal. About this princess we only know
that she loves to play with her golden ball, and that
she will not having a frog near her. Her father king
then forces her to fulfil her promise, leaving the frog
coming on her pillow. Just when she kisses the slimy
frog, in spite of his animal shape, she breaks the spell
that condemned him to that animal shape. The prince
finally tells that his curse came from a female
character, then we note that he had to live into water,
which traditionally is, together with earth, a female
element. To idealize the loved one might look as a form of great love and devotion, which however implies the incestuous bond with the parent loved and mythicized in childhood. Only the gradual acceptance of the troubling extraneousness of the other, unravels the injunction of the Castle of the Forced Love. It makes no difference if the story tells of a father who requires to marry his daughter (type Donkey Skin) or of a daughter who would die to save her father’s life. Children do not choose parents, it is a kind of forced love that is necessary to grow up; girls and boys normally love and idealize them in childhood, while maturity requires that children work the loss of this ideal. To become adult means to give up the ideal parents, together with the daughter’s and the son’s image of perfect creatures, being the ideal partners of that ideal lover. The
incest taboo marks a boundary between parents and
descendants, so that we can understand that time flows
irreversibly, to make possible the separation between
generations and their alternation, with the fertility
that renews life. The female and male filial actants
need to gain experience of their mutual desire,
risking loosing each other. The Beast is afraid that
Beauty will not come back to him, but he lets her go,
while Beauty is afraid that the Beast died for her
fault, and to save him accepts to marry him in spite
of his ugliness. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Quadrants | |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To navigate Fairy-tale Land you need clear devices, so as to follow your path without getting lost. This fascinating land is made up of numberless stories and characters connecting to each other in conventional or strange ways, giving rise to fairy tales you already know, to other tales you never heard of, and to other ones telling of a character or a motif you already heard of, whose developments might nevertheless surprise you. We thought of a first, simple, clear and well-known device to help you to find your position. We could not find anything better than the cardinal points, which always show the way for travellers by land and by sea. North, south, east, and west: you can identify them by looking at the position of the sun related to the horizon. Nevertheless, in Fabulando there are other references. The perspective of a fairy tale coincides with the perspective of its main character, its main actant (let us think, for example, of Snow White, of Cinderella, of the youth who is going to become the Marquis of Carabas with his helper Pussy Cat). The tale tells the story of its main actant and his/her journey to achieve adult autonomy. At the story’s beginning, each main actant faces a parental actant and his/her injunction, which is his/her main reference. The matter changes if the parental actant is a female or male character, because facing a mother rather than a father figure entails different commitments and leads to different paths. Moreover, there is a crucial difference if the main actant is a girl or a boy: in the fairy tale genders are well defined, and the path of a girl never coincides with a boy’s one. The generative meeting entails here these opposite polarities. The watershed in our Fairy Map of Succession is the gender of the main and parental actants: female/male defines the polarity of the young actants, motherly/fatherly defines the polarity of the parental actants. We then have four poles, corresponding to the cardinal points. Polarity is our fundamental key, echoing the sun/moon opposition, allegory of the male/female couple; in many languages the word sun is masculine while moon is feminine, the opposite applies in other languages; what we always find is their opposition. We placed the paternal injunctions north just as we chose the mountains to represent the father figure. The maternal injunctions found their place in the south, and the sea is a universal symbol of the mother. We put westward the fairy tales whose main actant is a female. We can start from the stories of the feminine, the most numerous among fairy tales. The tales whose main actant is a male one went east, where the sun, masculine in Italian, rises. We thus got four quadrants in which to organize our fairy tales. Nonetheless, some of them would not find an easy fit, e.g. Hänsel and Gretel and the versions of The Green Beaubird, because their injunction comes from both parents and there are female and male actants. Therefore, we had to design for them the impossible South-north-east-west Quadrant. These five quadrants, together with our ten injunctions, are the devices you can use to find your bearings within Fabulando and its Fairy Map of Succession. Every fairy tale has its own map, with its quadrant in the upper left, and with a click or touch, you can open the map of that quadrant with all its fairy tales, linked in turn to their own maps. But can you see other possible paths? We made up Fabulando to invite you to go on scouting and meeting new characters and stories. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southwest
Quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In this quadrant we see fairy tales with a main female actant who sets off down her path and begins her tale responding to a necessity, an order, a constraint, or a death sentence enacted by a maternal figure. In this quadrant, there is just one fairy tale in which the maternal figure does not impose anything on her daughter, and it is the tale of The Seven Little Pigeons. In this tale, the main actant leaves of her own free will, to find a remedy for the lack of the maternal figure that consists of her mother and of her mother's absent-minded midwife. In every other tale of this quadrant, the main actant undergoes an oppression of different degrees. They start with the segregated Cinderella and Parsley, oppressed by a stepmother or by an ogress, and they end with the curse and death sentence that condemn Sleeping Beauty and Snow White to a comatose sleep. Between these degrees we find the possible and dangerous task imposed by her mother on Red Riding Hood, the exile imposed on Flower and Flowerstem by their stepmother, the impossible task imposed on the main actant by the mother in the tale The Mammone Cat, the dereliction of Pooavola Doll, imposed on her daughters by their poor mother, who upon dying leaves them only a small box filled with tow. We want to observe that we find the Tower of the Segregation only in this quadrant, while the Sailing Ship of the Black Curse and the Gibbet of the Death Sentence are found only in the southern part of the map. We see then that only a female main actant may undergo a segregation imposed only by a maternal figure, and we see that a female or male main actant may undergo a black curse or a death sentence only coming from a maternal figure. The worst persecution, which can imprison or kill the descendant, belongs to this quadrant or to the southeast quadrant, and this means that the worst threat comes from the maternal figure. If we were now to deduce from all this that mothers are more dangerous than fathers, we would miss the meaning of fairy tales; we prefer to see that the relation with the mother is highly dangerous remembering that through this relation every human being obtains life and nourishment, the first food that is foundation and pattern for every future nourishment. The female main actants in the southwest quadrant are beautiful, good and innocent, even if they kill their first stepmother, like the seventeenth-century Cat Cinderella. If it is told that the good mother died, we know that the daughter has lost her good donor mother. The perfect goodness is only on the side of the daughter, representing an ideal Ego, and to this perfect daughter corresponds an evil mother who can even kill her daughter and eat her heart. These fairy tales represent a psychological conflict, and our identification with the beautiful innocent main actant protects us from anxiety and allows our destructive unconscious drives to emerge. These themes concern any mother-daughter relation in everyday life. Using the key of succession, we suggest that there is a common constant in this conflict, that may take numberless shapes in fairy tales. In common life it takes many shapes too, as many as there are mothers and daughters who live through it. These fairy tales tell of a mother who does not want to be overwhelmed by her daughter, a mother who does not want to grow old, to see her beauty fading, her power decreasing, and her death approaching. This mother tries to do something to stop time. On the opposite side, there is a daughter who tries to do something to speed up time, like the little girl who wants to take for herself her mother’s clothes, her jewels, her place near her father and her power to give life. These are immortal indomitable desires that do not need any permission to come into play. Nevertheless, it is through their opposition that life flows. The young actant wins because time works for her victory, not because she is better than her mother, even if it is important to believe this, so important that fairy tales always tell of a beautiful innocent daughter. We could not face life, so hard and full of risks, without a confidence in ourselves, thinking to be better than we really are. Lest we should see where we are, Lost in a haunted wood, Children afraid of the night, Who have never been happy or good. (W. H. Auden, September, 1, 1939) The fairy tales of the southwest quadrant always tell that a time has to pass, a time without time, or an incredibly long time, maybe a century, so long is the expectance of Sleeping Beauty. Time always wins, and life flows scoffing at our human delusion to slow it down or speed it up. Beauty and innocence are made to blossom like flowers, following their season. Fairy tales pretend to mimic the rhythm of life. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northwest
Quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This clearly
incestuous fairy tale shows the character of the
northwest quadrant, a father who imposes himself on his
daughter, and a daughter who cannot do her life because
she is bound to her father. The first love of every girl
is her father, and if she does not stop keeping him as
her ideal lover, she will not be able to love a human
being, who can never correspond to an ideal image. There are then
fairy tales characterized by a metaphorical incest, like
Rot-Eyes and Beauty and the Beast.
In this stories a father loves his daughter so much that
he risks his life to pick a rose for her; the daughter
loves him so much that she is ready to offer her life to
save her father. The love ideal is so strong that the
transformation and the happy ending come just after a
long closeness with the opposite of the ideal, the
Beast. In the
Calabrian Provençal tale Solver
of Riddles, Solve this Riddle, the incest
concerns the nourishment that a daughter gives her
prisoner father. This incest gives the riddle par
excellence, and since the solver marquis is not able to
solve it, the main female actant gets freedom for her
father. In The Lost Doll the
main female actant is the beloved daughter of a king who
suddenly dies. She loses her father and the doll that
she always kept near herself, and her happy ending
cannot come if she does not find out her doll. This doll
means here the ideal image of the princess, a part of
her identity that she needs to grow up. A prince has
found the lost doll, and fell in love with this ideal
image; the princess find her lost doll with him, and
they get happily married. In the tale of
Sweet Diamond Pie the main
female actant loves so much her ideal partner that she
does not leave her father's house. Then she gets from
her merchant father the ingredients to make a man of her
taste. In the tale of Violet the main actant demands to be an ideal for her prince, and escaping all his attacks she arouses his desire. She leads a courteous cunning game that however would not be enough to get a happy ending. As well as in every fairy tale of this quadrant, the ideal needs to confront itself with its opposite, that here is an ogre. This clumsy ingenuous creature adopts the cunning beautiful Violet, and this combination of opposites is the ingredient that every fairy tale in this quadrant needs to reach an happy ending. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northeast
Quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The sun of the main male actant floodlights the Paternal Mountains, and the parent injunctions drive to long journeys the protagonists in the fairy tales inscribed on this quadrant. We could start with the two Little John, both lacking intention to learn a trade to live. Dauntless Little John has no parent: the injunction of his tale is the lack of paternal law. He lives here or there as if everything would be simple, without any desire, so that he can spend a whole night in a cursed castle, because nothing frightens him. But he then dies at the first sight of his own shadow, or of his own bottom. The other little John too is never afraid (Little John and the Shudder), but he misses fear, and he has a father who throws him out of the house, because little John does not learn anything. The feeling of a lack is necessary to learn from experience, and it leads the main actant to an ending quite different from Dauntless Little John. In the ancient fairy tale The Raven and in The White Ricotta - which is one of its popular variants - the young king has no parent and his paternal injunction is implicit: he is opposed against the father who left him his throne, because he reigns without any interest to marry and leave his throne to an heir. Through a sudden image, this king falls in love with an ideal woman, who links life - red blood - and death - white marble. The tale disentangles step by step, risk after risk, this mixture of death and life that would block the alternation of generations. This tale is so harsh that it could be enough to teach how fairy tales are not at all reassuring stories for children. Main male actants like Madmatt or the poor lad who owns just a cat (Master Cat or Puss in Boots), may find a male magic helper, who gives them what they are missing. Here we see a father who cannot issue his son with a concrete inheritance, but the main actant experiences a magic or supernatural helper who endows him with magic gifts; at the end, he marries a princess and becomes heir to the throne. The father turns out of his house the main actant of the tale The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket, as well as the father in the tale Little John and the Shudder. The main actant starts without any father's protection and this forces him to count just on his resources and on the helpers he may meet. On this way, these actants can grow up and get a happy ending through amazing and risky adventures. This is one of the best stories of the Tale of Tales by Basile, and it is hilarious. The Golden Eagle is the most ancient tale of our collection, and it may be seen more as a chivalry tale than a fairy tale. The main actant, Arrighetto, heir to the German Empire,conquers Lena, or Elena, in spite of her father, the King of Aragon. He enters in her room hiding into a big golden eagle, as well as the Greeks entered in Troy hiding in the wooden horse. Then his paternal antagonist is the King of Aragon, and the rape of Lena causes a war that involves all the European peoples. Jesus, the highest paternal authority, endows the faber of the Friulian tale Smithy Menico of the means to cheat Death and Devil. This male main actant might be a little fairy-tale brother of the mythic Prometheus, since his desire is not to save his soul, but to play tricks on supernatural beings. We finally see in this quadrant two fairy tales with an explicit paternal injunction, The Marmotta Queen and Frog, Frog. In these tales, the king father imposes an impossible task on his sons, in order to choose his successor. The main male actant finally gets the throne because he tried this impossible task. In the first tale he finds the water to cure his king father of blindness, in the second one he has to find his wife in a ditch were only a frog lives. In the fairy tales, the main actants having an impossible task or choosing an impossible commitment always get a happy ending. Just a superficial look fails to appreciate the realistic truth told by fairy tales: life is an impossible task that we cannot give up, unless we stop it together with ourselves. Life flows with us through the succession of the generations. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southeast
Quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The sun of the main male actant here rises from the sea or goes down into the sea. The protagonist of the Umbrian tale Thus Ended the Idiot drowns into the Maternal Sea because he does not know the complexity of language and the responsibility of the subject using it. He cannot grow up because his mother, knowing his simple-mindedness, teaches him what to say, as if he would never run into unforeseen circumstances. This dumb actant repeats other's words and he cannot learn anything during his journey. Little Chickpea tells of a woman, consumed with the lack of children, who gets so many children from her pot of chickpeas that she kills them. Just one of these very little sons survives, and he hides himself and comes out just when he gets from his mother the promise that she will not kill him. This fairy tale tells that the mother's desire is not enough to live. Little Chickpea becomes his father's assistant, he disappears into the belly of a cow and he comes out of it thanks to his father. Then he can live happily ever after with his parents. A male main actant goes to look for his three sisters who disappeared in a far world, because they had to marry three animals (The Three Animal Kings) or three passers-by (The Dying Fairy's Will). In the first tale, the main actant chooses by himself to set off to remedy this lack of the female element, in the second tale an old woman by a spell forces him to start the same research. To recover the lost female side means repairing his mother's loss and this entails many vicissitudes that drive to a happy ending. In The Enchanted Doe, the queen becomes pregnant thanks to a magic fish that is so powerful that even the queen's damsel becomes pregnant. Two boys are born like two peas in a pod, and they grow up loving each other more than two brothers. The queen hates the son of her damsel and she tries to kill him. Then this youth leaves and conquers a princess, but an ogre catches him. The prince then sets up and goes to free him. These two brothers get their happy ending helping each other to nullify the mother's deadly power. In this quadrant, we find the first ancient version of Master Cat or Puss in Boots (Puss in Boots), where a dying mother leaves her younger child just a she-cat. The poor lad follows the advices of his animal helper and finally he surpasses his elder brothers, who got from the mother enough to make a normal living. The injunction of the Sailing Ship of the Black Curse is only in the south quadrants of our map, like a mortgage that the main actants get from birth. It can come from their's mother or a curse, in any case coming from a maternal figure. The main male actant in the fairy tale Pig King has an animal body, and he turns into a handsome prince just when his wife loves him enough to take care with tenderness of him when he is a dirty pig. In a 19th Florentine version the Pig's wife has to go and look for him so long to worn out seven pair of iron shoes and seven iron sticks, and to fill up seven flasks with her tears (Re porco, version collected by Vittorio Imbriani). In this quadrant there is also the first story of Basile's collection, The Tale of the Ogre. Here the maternal injunction is explicit like the paternal one of the fairy tale The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket. In the first story a father chases away a loafer idiot son, in the second a mother does the same, and these parents beat their sons so harshly that they run away not to die under their father or mother's blows. In The Tale of the Ogre, we find with the main actant an ugly ogre who is a good master, making the idiot boy able to give a rich dowry to his sisters and live happily and wealthy together with his mother. This tale is an ancient splendid version of the popular European fairy tales Table-Be-Set, Gold-Donkey, and Cudgel-out-of-the-Sack. The story tells how the actant can grow up starting from a very bad condition, if he sets off and has the time - and the chance - to learn from his experience. The sun of the main male actants does not end in the Maternal Sea if they can separate from her; this comes true only when they meet a male helper, be he a brother (The Enchanted Doe), three brothers-in-law (The Three Animal Kings and The Dying Fairy's Will), or even a master ogre (The Tale of the Ogre). (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northwestsoutheast
Quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Travelling through the boundless land of Fairy Tales, we decided to draw a map to enable you to travel using our map, choosing the most clear and less strict coordinates, symbols and signs we could draw. We then assigned our Sixty-seven fairy tales to the four quadrants of our map, so that you - choosing our map - can travel by it and visit these tales, enjoying their beauty, finding out their origin, catching sight of the countries, the writers and the illustrators who handed down them to us. We enjoy their inheritance, together with the wealth of the numberless storytellers, men and women that all over the world told these fairy tales and did not pass on their name. Then, as soon as we thought to have ordered our collection with the Fairy Map of Succession, some other fairy tales came that we thought to be able to place in one of our quadrant, but they moved upwards and downwards, going eastwards and westwards. To keep the coherence of our map we should have put these tales aside and forget them, since they do not stop in any quadrant. Nevertheless, we love too much this potent, soft and democratic storytelling genre to prefer our map to their inhexaustible polysemy. Then we added an impossible fifth quadrant, and once more we understood that the exception proves the rule and gives evidence to this genre's strength: no outline can include all fairy tales. The fairy tale that made us draw the northsoutheastwestern quadrant is one of the most popular in the world, Hänsel e Gretel. Starting from its title, this fairy tale has two equally persecuted main actants, male and female, which are equally active to react against the danger, to be overwhelmed by hunger, that is at first is the hunger of their mother, then of their father, then of an old witch. Their witch lives in a house made of the cookies and the sweets that children gladly eat, but the witch nourishes them to eat them as soon as they become tasty. This fairy tale starts with the injunction of the Gibbet of the Death Sentence, coming from their mother who realizes it together with their father. They abandon their children in the forest, where the wild animals will devour them. Here we have a maternal and paternal death sentence, against their son and daughter. The children save themselves together, instead of dying together, and they defeat the witch, who is a supernatural devouring maternal figure. The parent's hunger and the famine in this story entail the elimination of the new generation, because the old generation chooses to stop time sacrificing the youngs. Then, when we drew the impossible fifth quadrant, with its Maternal Sea and Paternal Mountains, with the sun and moon representing the male and female main actants, we were thinking also of one of our favourite fairy tales, that we had first excluded from our collection because we were not able to decide where to place it in our Fairy Map of Succession. It is The Green Beaubird - this is our translation of the Italian Augel Belverde -, a fairy tale spread all over Europe, whose first printed version was written by Giovan Francesco Straparola in 16th century. It has interesting analogies with the novella of Griselda by Giovanni Boccaccio, the hundredth ending tale of Decameron. Francesco Petrarca translated it in Latin (De insigni obedientia et fide uxoris), and Geoffrey Chaucer retold it in Canterbury Tales (The Clerk's tale). There is no magic in Boccaccio's novella, but the two main characters are so extreme in their way of acting that they might be someway enchanted. In The Green Beaubird the persecutor is a maternal figure, the mother of the king who married the main female actant, convincing the king to punish his innocent wife. Moreover, the mother queen sentences to death the three beautiful magic children of the young queen. Nevertheless, the three twins survive, and grow up to go and look for their parents. They all have to face up to impossible tasks and they risk to die to get magical objects that belong to the alchemy tradition. The three twins have magical gifts, like golden hair and a star on their forehead. The maternal black curses of the southern quadrants give the main actants an animal body or a death sleep. In The Green Beaubird there is a maternal gift, a blessing that protects the children, making them wonderful and rich, and this activates the envy of the mother queen, who cannot tolerate to be surpassed. Like nearly every fairy tale, The Green Beaubird tells how the old generation tries to eliminate the new one, as if this could stop its decline. The magic beauty of the three children remembers the beauty of every child for its parents and grandparents, because on one side we would not like to die, on the other side we know that only the new generation can inherit and save our hope for a better future. Each fairy tale tells in a different way how succession may be a tragic game and how life tends to flow getting round obstacles or dissolving them into thin air. We could simply make friends with time, learning to await and to seize the moment to act. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.
Lake of Generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the Lake of Generation located in the centre of our map, the waters of four rivers mix together. These four rivers separate and join our map's four quadrants. Since the Paternal Mountains are in the north, the river that separates and joins northwest and northeast quadrants originates from the mountains and flows into the lake, of which it is a tributary. An outflowing river flows from the Lake into the Maternal Sea separating and joining the southwest and the southeast quadrants. The two rivers that separate and join the south quadrants can be considered as flowing out of the Lake. In this case their meaning they express is that the new generation comes from the blend of the parental waters. However, they could be also considered to be tributaries of the Lake, representing female and male actants coming from different places and bringing their water to the Lake of Generation. At the same time they change from descendants or children into parents. The Lake of Generation is in any case the centre of the Fairy Map of Succession, with its tributary and emissary four rivers. This means that succession is the core and heart of all our tales. The centre of the map thus represents the triple generative meeting among the four types of actants; the first one unites in marriage male and female parental actants, the second one unites parents and children, the third one unites in a new marriage male and female actants and restores life. Time marks these meetings with a double movement that intertwines a direct irreversible motion with a circular cyclical motion. The irreversible nature of time requires the growth of the descendant, towards generative maturity, and it also requires the ageing of the parent. Death, if it is not untimely, comes first to the parent, while the son and the daughter ascend to the throne of life. The cyclical nature of time leads the youths to the place of their parents, so that they inherit and preserve their throne, to leave it to their children when in their turn they will abdicate from it or die. Following the irreversible movement of time, of the years that follow each other and never come back, our story starts with our birth, out of nothing, leads us to the highest power of maturity, which goes on for some years, and then we die, going back to nothing. We renew our parent's life following the cyclical movement of time, with its weeks bringing the same seven days, and its months and seasons that come back every year with their feasts. Also our parents renewed their parent's life, following a chain that started once upon a time, a long time ago, a chain that never broke, to get to us. We are a ring in this chain and we receive life from the rings before ours, as well as we give life to the rings after ours. If our personal story belongs to this chain, it cannot be voided by nothingness, but our individual life, untied from past and future generations, is always threatened by a lack of sense. The masculine and the feminine are universally represented by the sun and the moon, as well as by earth and sky, and they make up a couple of opposites that attract each other. Their intertwining is constant and it ties them together without confusing them, indicating the fertility of their braid. Our calendar consists of months, that depend on the regular rhythm of sun, which over the course of one year covers the circle of the zodiac, and it depends also on weeks, which last for a phase of the moon. These two motions of time could be seen as two moods of our being. One of these moods shapes and protects our perception of ourselves as distinctive unrepeatable beings, living in a time and in a space that have the same limits of our physical existence. The other mood corresponds to the cyclical motion of time and takes place between others and us. It belongs neither only to us nor only to others, but is a means between them and us and leads us to the common life. The single ring that we are gains value from its bonds with other rings, and our present is made up of the heritage that we receive from the past and the heritage that we leave for the future. We cannot reach an equilibrium if we do not acknowledge our bond with the past. First of all, with our parents, who gave birth to us. Parents look powerful to their children, they look like the kings, queens, fairies and ogres of fairy tales, who are both givers and persecutors. Then we have to acknowledge the gift of life coming from our ancestors and from the cultures that preceded us and gave birth to our own, in which we are living and speaking. At the same time, we have to acknowledge our bond with the future generations and gain experience from it, first of all by looking to our children who gaze at us as if we were beautiful and rich, like the main actants in fairy tales. We also need to take on a responsibility for the future, without which our hopes and projects do not have space to blossom. But we cannot work successfully if we expect to immediately reap the benefits of what we do. The beauty of the future generations is like the happy ending of fairy tales: it is told of, but we cannot be there to prove it. That bit of joy which we taste when happiness comes into the tale should be enough for us, even if we are all grown up and disenchanted. Nobody knows if beyond the happy ending the tale’s characters will really live forever together in peace and prosperity. Nevertheless, if we were to lose even that bit of joy, if we do not smile when Cinderella finally dances and flies with her Prince Charming, we would miss a vital thing, the lightness of our desire. There is only one woman who teaches philosophy in the Dialogues by Plato. She comes onto the stage in the Symposium, the dialogue about Love/Eros. Diotima, this woman, tells Socrates the story of the birth of Eros and teaches him how he was wrong about Eros. The philosopher tells his table companions of what he learnt, because speaking of this topic they were making his same mistake. They thought that Love/Eros was beautiful and good because they were thinking of the one who is loved. But to love means to have desire and longing for something above everything else, for something or somebody that we do not have, another being that our desire renders perfectly beautiful and good. This beauty belongs to the main actants of fairy tales and it exists in reality: it belongs to children in their parents' eyes and to parents in their little children's eyes, as well as to lovers in each others' eyes. The beauty of a child's mother or father becomes a fading illusion when he or she grows up, as well as the beauty of the beloved looks like a blunder or a fraud when love is gone. However, parents love their children forever, with joy when they understand each other and when they exchange gifts with each other, and then with sorrow when there are clashes and misunderstandings. When we are children, we return this love with our whole being. But as soon as we reach maturity, we break the mirror of our ideal parent into pieces, in order to look far away from our origin and find something or somebody who might build up a new mirror for our new ideal of beauty. A commitment, a job, a lover, a child, may come to us to reflect our ideal image, because somehow we always need to think that we are, or we were or will be again good and beautiful, like Cinderella and Prince Charming. If this disenchantment does not come, if the mirror and the reflection does not break in pieces, life does not flow, because we are motionless, like Narcissus and his image. Nevertheless, this disenchantment is hard, because every transformation means a loss, and because the cyclical motion of time brings new flowers and fruits every year, but the flowers and the fruits of this particular season wither, rot and disappear forever. All we know is that our permanence through new generations and our fleeting presence as unrepeatable subjects intertwine, and we can live in this fact and acknowledge a sense in it or not. It is however, the way life flows, because life makes use out of the death of the old generation which makes way for the new one, so that the vigour and the beauty of children, of youths, renew life while parents become old. This is the first or the last sense of life, a mystery to be veiled more than to be unveiled. The succession of the new generation needs those three encounters, between parents through their union, then between parents and their children, and finally between different youths, who through their union reach the place of their parents. This tale has been told in one thousand tales and one. Religions and ideologies teach how to deal with it. But no tale about this logos of life could ever overcome what Diotima taught Socrates, because her tale was in love with life's truth and able to stand off against what eludes the mastery of our thought. This procreation is the union of man and woman, and is a divine thing; for conception and generation are an immortal principle in the mortal creature … But why of generation?' 'Because to the mortal creature, generation is a sort of eternity and immortality,' she replied; 'and if, as has been already admitted, love is of the everlasting possession of the good, all men will necessarily desire immortality together with good: Wherefore love is of immortality. ... What is the cause, Socrates, of love, and the attendant desire? See you not how all animals, birds, as well as beasts, in their desire of procreation, are in agony when they take the infection of love, which begins with the desire of union; whereto is added the care of offspring, on whose behalf the weakest are ready to battle against the strongest even to the uttermost, and to die for them, and will let themselves be tormented with hunger or suffer anything in order to maintain their young. Man may be supposed to act thus from reason; but why should animals have these passionate feelings? Can you tell me why? … For here again, and on the same principle too, the mortal nature is seeking as far as is possible to be everlasting and immortal: and this is only to be attained by generation, because generation always leaves behind a new existence in the place of the old. Nay even in the life of the same individual there is succession and not absolute unity: a man is called the same, and yet in the short interval which elapses between youth and age, and in which every animal is said to have life and identity, he is undergoing a perpetual process of loss and reparation—hair, flesh, bones, blood, and the whole body are always changing. Which is true not only of the body, but also of the soul, whose habits, tempers, opinions, desires, pleasures, pains, fears, never remain the same in any one of us, but are always coming and going; and equally true of knowledge, and what is still more surprising to us mortals, not only do the sciences in general spring up and decay, so that in respect of them we are never the same; but each of them individually experiences a like change. For what is implied in the word "recollection," but the departure of knowledge, which is ever being forgotten, and is renewed and preserved by recollection, and appears to be the same although in reality new, according to that law of succession by which all mortal things are preserved, not absolutely the same, but by substitution, the old worn-out mortality leaving another new and similar existence behind—unlike the divine, which is always the same and not another? And in this way, Socrates, the mortal body, or mortal anything, partakes of immortality; but the immortal in another way. Marvel not then at the love which all men have of their offspring; for that universal love and interest is for the sake of immortality. (Symposium) (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.
Fabulando Storytelling
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is another principle guiding our work. We love the beautiful old books of fairy tales, we enjoy their charm, page after page, image after image, surprise after surprise, and we believe that it is possible to get this pleasure also by digital means, like our Fabulando e-books. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.1
E-book |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We told almost every fairy tale in two e-books, including the tale in the original language and the facing translation in the languages we chose, Italian, that is our mother tongue, and English, which is now the international language. We drew the original language versions from the major collections available online; the Italian dialectal fairy tales come from 19th and early 20th century collections, the ancient fairy tales come from 14th, 16th and 17th century Italian collections, the European tales come from the collections written by Charles Perrault, the Grimm Brothers, and others. The e-books of
these four sections bear the following titles on their
covers: We
transcribed the Italian dialectal fairy-tales and the
English, German or French ones from the quoted sources
(see the final page Fonti/Sources in every
e-book, and the Fairybiblio,
Bibliography of Fabulando) keeping the punctuation marks
of the original edition. The punctuation variety is a
mirror of the variety of the verbal, narrative and
symbolic language of the fairy-tales. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.2
E-kamishibai |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In
Fabulando many illustrations come from the work of
Walter
Crane (1845-1915) who retold through images many
popular fairy tales. We imitated the Japanese kamishibai
and adapted it to the digital media, reworking these
illustrations to get a wider set of images. Everybody
can slide with a touch or a click to tell the fairy tale
as he/she likes, just like a real kamishibaya. We have an
e-kamishibai for these fairy tales: Beauty and the Beast,
Little Brier Rose, Cat Cinderella (by
the Authors of Fabulando), Jack
and the Beanstalk, Little
Red Riding Hood, Master Cat or Puss in Boots,
Puss
in Boots, Sleeping
Beauty in the Wood, Snow
White and the Seven Dwarfs, and The Frog Prince.
(CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.3 Fairy tales for
YouTube |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.4
Movies |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We would like
to say something else about Puss
in Boots. Walter
Crane illustrated the most famous version of this
tale, Master Cat or
Puss in Boots by Charles
Perrault. We inserted this tale, well known
throughout the world, among our European fairy tales,
but we chose to rework the first version of Puss in
Boots published in the world (La
Gatta, available on the website Adalinda
Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole). It
belongs to the 16th century collection The
Facetious
Nights by Giovan Francesco Straparola, and
it tells of a madam cat. So, Fabulando offers Puss in Boots and
Master Cat or Puss in Boots,
with the same illustrations. Nevertheless, we chose to
realize our movie starting from the first charming
version, which is less
known. (CC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.5
Cat Cinderella App-tale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(To download
this app go to the Map
of
the Tale; other
news about it are also available). (CC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.6
History of the fairy tale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.
Sixty-six fairy tales |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We chose the Sixty-seven fairy tales of our collection following two intertwined lines, researching both the pleasure of storytelling charged with meaning and a philological strictness. Our choice of ancient and first versions does not however depend on a mere wish for correctness. An example of our reasoning is given by this story. We put forward this scarcely known version of Snow White, published by the Grimm Brothers, not because it is the best one, but because it is little known and yet very meaningful. It shows the heart of this tale's subject matter more than other versions. The core of Snow White is the crucial hand-to-hand fight between mother and daughter that we called injunction of the Gibbet of the Death Sentence. We chose our fairy tales classifying them both according to our ten injunctions, and facing the immense heritage of storytelling, especially in Europe. We chose Cinderella because this tale has been with us since the start of our research, and because it is one of the most famous fairy tales. Similarly, we chose to include in Fabulando most other very popular fairy tales. Then we went back to the first fairy tales published in the world, which are Italian, and to the countless versions told in the Italian dialects. And so the Fabulando collection of fairy tales has three subdivisions. There is a first thread linking the tales depending on their injunction and quadrant. There is a second thread that links the tales depending on the section they belong to. These two threads remind us that we could look at fairy tales from many angles: each of them has its value and none of them could encompass all fairy tales. 1. People of Wonders. Italian Dialectal Fairy Tales In this section there are some tales told in many Italian dialects and three tales from Italian territories with linguistic minorities (Catalan of Alghero, Sardinia; Calabrian Occitan or Guardiolo, spoken in Guardia Piemontese (Calabria); and Tabarchino, that owes its name to Tabarca, an Algerian town where a Ligurian colony lived, which was then transferred to a little island off the southwest coast of Sardinia). This section includes the tales Belindu the Monster, in Alghero Catalan, Little Chick-Pea in Tabarchino, Thus Ended the Idiot in Umbrian-Latial, Flower and Flowerstem in the dialect of the Abruzzi and Marche, The Mammone Cat and The Marmotta Queen in Montalese dialect (Tuscany), The Dying Fairy's Will in Ciociaria (Lazio) dialect, Solver of Riddles, Solve this Riddle in Calabrian Occitan, The Lost Doll in Piedmontese, The White Ricotta in Calabrian, The Crystal Casket in Senese (Tuscany), Smithy Menico in the dialect of Friuli, Frog, Frog in Romanesco, Sfurtuna in Sicilian and Dauntless Little John in the Italian version by Italo Calvino. We realized the Italian Dialectal e-books putting the dialectal storytelling beside the national Italian - or the English language - to propose some fairy tales coming from different Italian regions, but mainly to give through Fabulando the opportunity to taste and enjoy the vividness and the tenderness of Italian popular fairy tales. All the dialectal tales are translated in Italian, except Frog, Frog, in Romanesco, The Mammone Cat and The Crystal Casket (both in Tuscan dialects) because Italians, or those who know our language, understand them. Even if The Marmotta Queen is equally understandable, it has a parallel text in Italian by Italo Calvino. Our aim was to give in Fabulando a clear example of the linguistic and stylistic work carried out by the Italian writer on traditional Italian tales for his collection Fiabe italiane (1956) (Italian Folktales). Our collection includes another fairy tale by Calvino, Dauntless Little John, which can be compared with another tale featuring Little John, Little John and the Shudder, common all over Europe as well as the version chosen and rewritten by Calvino. The two little Johns are equally dauntless, and they deal with similar adventures, but their tales go in quite different directions. Their tales are in the northeast quadrant, but Dauntless Little John starts with the Fork of the Possible Task, while Little John and the Shudder starts with the Forest of the Exile. Italo Calvino introduces the first tale of his collection, Dauntless Little John, without pointing out the difference between this and the other version. Calvino likes the imperturbable main character, who in his view shows a calm firmness dealing with the unknown. But Calvino does not see the link between this lack of fear and the final death of Little John. (To read other dialectal Italian fairy tales, see Fiabe italiane dialettali e alloglotte, website Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole). To see an annotated bibliography of the sources used by Italo Calvino for his Italian Folktales, with biographical notes about the collectors, see Percorsi di pensiero, by Claudia Chellini. At the present time, some of the dialectal Italian tales in Fabulando (those here quoted with Italian titles) have no English translation, we apologize. 2. The World’s First Fairy Tales. Published in Italy from the 16th to the 17th century The second section of our collection is Source of Wonders. Ancient Italian Fairy Tales from 16th to the 17th century. Here we have collected the first fairy tales published in the world, which come mainly from The Pentamerone, or The Story of Stories by Giambattista Basile (1634-36), where we find very famous tales (besides Cinderella, there is also Parsley, today better known as Rapunzel, the title that the Grimm Brothers gave it), and other little known tales that belong to the narrative heritage told in Italian dialects and in other European languages. Fabulando includes: The Seven Little Pigeons, The Three Animal Kings, The Raven, The Enchanted Doe, The Tale of the Ogre, Cat Cinderella, The Cockroach, The Mouse and the Cricket, Sweet Diamond Pie, Madmatt, Parsley and Violet. Basile includes in his collection also a version of Puss in Boots (the second to be published after Straparola). The protagonist of this version is still a she-cat, which will become a male cat in Perrault's version. Fabulando does not include Basile's version, but our Puss in Boots tells something about it in her story of her tale (Puss Tells her Story). A century before The Pentamerone, or The Story of Stories, Giovan Francesco Straparola published The Facetious Nights (1550-1553), a collection of novellas, which included some fairy tales that spread throughout Europe. This section of Fabulando presents three fairy tales by Straparola, Pooavola Doll, ancient version of The Golden Goose by the Grimm Brothers, L'Augel Belverde, an ancient version of Princess Belle-Etoille, and Pig King, an ancient version of Prince Marcassin, by Mme d'Aulnoy. 3. Europa in fabula. The World's Most Beloved Fairy Tales. The most well-known and retold fairy tales are collected in this section. We chose these tales taking into account both their rich meaning and their philological value. The most beloved fairy tales in the world are the tales today recurrent in contemporary storytelling, particularly in films and television series. We decided to choose for our collection the versions written by the great European writers of this genre, first of all Charles Perrault and the Grimm Brothers. Their tales are intense and meaningful, and they were usually watered down by later storytellers. In this section we have included Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs in the first version published by the Grimm Brothers in 1812, where the enemy is Snow White's mother, who will become her step-mother from the Grimm Brothers' second version of the tale onwards. We have also included Red Riding Hood, which in Perrault's version has no happy ending, because no hunter comes to save the girl and her grand-mother. We selected Little John and the Shudder, Hänsel and Gretel and The Frog Prince by the Grimm Brothers and Sleeping Beauty in the Wood by Charles Perrault. The latter tale continues after Beauty's awakening, as she is persecuted by her mother-in-law, the old queen. Charles Perrault retold the tale Sun, Moon and Talia by Giambattista Basile, which does not end with the prince finding Sleeping Beauty. Finally we included Master Cat or Puss in Boots by Perrault and Beauty and the Beast by Madame de Beaumont. This section of our collection includes two very popular fairy tales that were retold from their most ancient versions, Cat Cinderella and Puss in Boots. Our Cat Cinderella comes from the app-tale we put together from the versions by Giambattista Basile (the first version ever published, present in Fabulando, Cat Cinderella), from Charles Perrault, from Walt Disney and from other Italian popular versions, like La Cenerentola, collected in Florence (Imbriani, 1877). Our version follows also the Cinderella told by images by Arthur Rackham, one of his masterpieces. We retold Puss in Boots from the tale written by Giovan Francesco Straparola (The Facetious Nights) which tells the story of Costantino Fortunato who inherits from his mother a she-cat who, thanks to her cunning, makes him beautiful and rich. Then we used Perrault's version, and the wonderfun illustrations by Walter Crane. This is the best known version of this tale. Our e-book Little John and the Shudder includes the original version by the Grimm Brothers, and the Italian translation by Antonio Gramsci from The Prison Notebooks (1929-1932). 4. Migrant Stories. Tales without Borders This section includes The Golden Eagle, a forteenth-century novella belonging to The Pecorone by Ser Giovanni, which is not a proper fairy tale but presents a narrative rythm and interesting motifs that evoke a fairy tale. Nevertheless, we chose this tale also for another reason. The Golden Eagle tells of an ancient battle where all the rising European nations are drawn up, proudly raising their coloured standards, with the neighing of the horses and the sound of the fifes and drums all around, which made it seem as if the world were full of thunder and lightning. The two opposing armies are fiercely fighting when the Pope forces them to make peace under threat of excommunication. Then the son and the daughter of the German Emperor marry the daughter and the son of the King of Aragon, to live happily forever after. May Europe be conscious and proud of its variegated banners and tales. Fairy tales and stories are formed and transformed through a continuous face-to-face between peoples and cultures, through the violence of wars as well as through mutual enrichment in times of peace. Whoever annexes a corpus of fairy tales, or even a single story, to a particular language or culture, and thinks that he has managed to appropriate it entirely, is wrong. Since the 19th century, many scholars have written about their migrations, between East and West, as well as between folk and educated storytellers. This Fabulando collection encompasses both very popular stories and less famous ones, to show the beauty which flows through all of them. They may be very far from each other in space and time, but they also show amazing connections. Fairy tales do not depend on any religion, nationality or ideology; nevertheless, they can easily wear the habits and customs of every people and can speak every language or dialect. We would offer these Migrant Stories of ours as a small antidote to any form of racism. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Mammone Cat Peak of the Impossible Task Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The core meaning of this fairy tale is made up of the three attempts to hinder the main actant, Bella Caterina, and cause her ruination: - Caterina's ugly mother and sister vex her in the hope of making her ugly; but she becomes even more beautiful; - they send her to the fairies hoping that they would disfigure her with their scratching; instead, she gets rich gifts from them, and a star on her forehead; - they lock her into a vat and the ugly sister pretends to be Caterina so as to marry the king's son; but Caterina marries the prince instead, and he eliminates her rivals. When Caterina must leave her house and enter the forest to go to the house of the fairies, she is scared, and weeps: the fairies might be enemies, even more dangerous than her mother and sister. The feeling of a mother who unjustly obstructs one's own growth is a common experience, like the longing for a mother who could totally accept and understand us. A married woman often looks at her mother-in-law as to a evil rival, while her mother is her helper. When a female main actant meets ambivalent magical characters, she has to deal with her own equally ambivalent perception of her maternal representation. Through this experience of her inconscious ambivalence she finds herself at risk, but she can also get precious gifts. Along the way, Caterina meets a poor old man, who asks her to look at his itchy head.Caterina stops and meets hos request. She kindly says that she sees on his head gold and pearls instead of lice. The old man is a paternal helper, who lives near the forest, which is the realm of mother nature, and he knows something precious about the fairies of that realm. He gives Caterina valuable instructions about helping the kittens who live in the house of the fairies, about choosing poor ornaments instead of precious jewels, and about climbing gently up their crystal ladder. This is the way to appease the destructive side of the fairies and of the Mammone Cat. In folk fairy tales magic actants may be both harmful and helpful, it depends on the approach of the actant who meets them. (Gherardo Nerucci collected this tale in 1880 from an oral storyteller). In one charming episode of this tale the kittens go and tell the Mammone Cat how Caterina helped them. Doing housework represents in fairy tales taking care of the beings who live in a given place, cleaning up the house and providing nourishment. Here the story tells something about the feminine talent to make a house liveable and keep it that way, and in the first place one's own house/body, where physic and psychic fecundity dwell. In fairy tales the talent to stage a space for living beings, to nourish and clean, to rest and restore them, belongs to the female main actant as expression of her being grown-up. The ugly sister is not able to do the same, because she does not feel fear or pain when she is going to the fairies; she underestimates the trial, and does not listen to the poor old man. She beats the kittens instead of helping them, she breaks the crystal ladders and she asks for precious things instead of being pleased with humble gifts. While Caterina gets a star on her forehead, she gets a donkey's tail. Caterina's shining beauty following her visit to the fairies attracts the king's son, who asks for her hand in marriage. The evil ugly mother and sister try to take for themselves what belongs to Caterina, and close her in a big barrel. The ugly sister is dressed as the bride, veiled to hide her face and tail, and led to the prince. He is about to take her with him to his palace, when he hears the kittens meow: Meow mew, listen to the cats, Meow mew, Beauty is in the barrel, Meow mew, the ugly in the coach sat! This happens also in the Grimm Brothers' Cinderella, Ashenputtel, when the prince is about to take a stepsister as his bride. Cinderella's little helpers, the doves, sing, There they go, there they go! There is blood on her shoe; The shoe is too small, Not the right bride at all! The Mammone Cat, a popular character in Tuscan folk fairy tales, has a male name, but its sound is reminiscent of th word mamma; the name might then refer to Mammon, one of the devil's names, or even to the Arabic maimon, which means lucky, favourable. Caterina acted in the right way in the feminine realm, getting the best from the fairies. Instead of her missing father, two different helpers come to her aid: the lousy old man and the Mammone Cat with his meowing and singing kittens. The king's son listens to the kittens as well as Caterina had listened to the old man, and he eliminates Caterina's rivals, who find themselves in the same barrel in which they had imprisoned her. The death of the ugly evil mother and sister means the final eradication of the envy that they represent. There is something magic in a kitten, and in the tenderness we give to a pet and receive from it in our everyday life, a tenderness which may even soothe a hardship. A pet is a creature near to nature, to Mother Nature, and taking care of it we can to some extent take care of our wounded maternal side. Waiting for the time when our pain can speak, coming out of the silence of repression, when our bond with Mother Nature will find its word, the voice of a kitten may relieve our sorrow: meow mew... meow mew... (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Solver
of Riddles, Solve this Riddle Peak of the Impossible Task Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roman Charity is the story of Pero, daughter of Myco, who secretely breastfeeds her father who has been incarcerated and sentenced to death by starvation. A jailer finds her out, but her action moves the prison officers. She thus wins the release of her father. The daughter breastfeeding her father is the subject of a Pompeian fresco (Pompei, Micon e Pero), and later many other artists painted this scene, like Peter Paul Rubens and Caravaggio. In The Seven Works of Mercy Caravaggio painted Pero breastfeeding Myco, representing two of the Seven Works of Mercy: Feeding the Hungry and Visiting Prisoners. In Solver of Riddles, Solve this Riddle the main female actant, like the ancient Roman Pero, breastfeeds her own incarcerated father and wins his release. While the Roman story stresses the daughter's charity, the Occitan tale stresses a traditional motif, linking the riddle, the oedipal situation and the irreducible ambiguity of language, a motif which here dominates the theme of breast feeding (mother/daughter) and suckling (child/father). Let us remember that Oedipus answered the riddle of the Sphinx concerning the succession of generations. Man is the simple solution, but Man's passage through his different ages is not a simple process. The hero will tragically learn this. In the core of Fabulando, something apparently simple - a fairy tale - and something very complex - the Greek tragedy - turn into each other, entailing birth-growth and ageing-death, to permit and hinder the transfering of inheritance. The riddle-solving Marquis of this tale of ours, believes in his own intelligence, but he crashes into the ambiguity of language when he faces the main female actant. Solver of riddles, son of a prince and great lord, solve my riddle: he used to be my father, now he is my child; and my child is married to my mother (e-book, p. 9) After the release is won by the female actant, another prisoner comes to ask the Marquis a different riddle, similar to other riddles, which recur with little variations throughout many popular tales: He shot what he saw and killed what he did not see, he ate both born and unborn flesh, cooked with old words, and he drank water that was neither in the sky nor on the ground (ibid., p. 13). The marquis tries to understand, but he cannot, and so he releases the prisoner and stops promising his subjects to release a prisoner everytime he cannot solve a riddle. The power-bearer here pays less dearly than Oedipus for the disclosure of the limits of his intelligence. Let us remember another tale, where a father-king who took his daughter as his wife wards off her suitors by imposing on them a riddle which both conceals and reveals its own solution. It is told in the Latin novel History Apollonii Regis Tyri (5th century AD), the Old English vernacular translation of which, Apollonius of Tyre (11th century), is known as the first English novel. Later, Shakespeare told the same story in Pericles, Prince of Tyre (see also: History Apollonii Regis Tyri, website Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole). Let us read the riddle as it is presented by Shakespeare: I am no viper, yet I feed On mother's flesh which did me breed. I sought a husband, in which labour I found that kindness in a father: He's father, son, and husband mild; I mother, wife, and yet his child. How they may be, and yet in two, As you will live, resolve it you. (Act 1, Sc. 1, 64-71) Our seemingly simple tale invites us to think about a subject with powerful roots. It survives in a little community of speakers whose story is at the same time fascinating, adventurous and tragic. In the 13th century, Waldesian Occitan communities fled from the Piedmont because of religious persecution. They migrated to a number of Calabrian villages: the name of the village where this tale was collected is Guardia Piemontese (previously called La Gardia, andGuardia dei Valdi). The Waldesians lived there in peace for about three centuries, alongside the local Catholic communities, until they joined the Protestant Reformation, as did the Piedmont Waldesian communities. In 1561 a Catholic cardinal, who would become Pope Pius V, called for a crusade against the Calabrian Waldesians and slaughtered men, women and children. The few survivors were forced to convert to Catholicism, and they could only speak their "Guardiolo" dialect among themselves, inside their houses. Catholic friars were sent to keep them under close surveillance, and for centuries nobody remembered that there were people who spoke Occitan in Southern Italy, not even the other Waldesian communities. In the final years of the 19th century, somebody 'discovered' those few people who still spoke a language which originated from the ancient Langue d'Oc, even though it was very heavily influenced by the Calabrian dialect. The cultural policy of the Italian state, especially during Fascism, was aimed at the elimination of dialects in order to spread the use of the national language. Nevertheless, nowadays we are finally witnessing a resurgence of interest in this particular dialect, which resonates with our contemporary passion for any species at risk of extinction. Does not this story of the Calabrian Waldesian Occitan community remind us of the incredible oppression suffered by many main actants in fairy tales? It could put together three injunctions: Tower of the Segregation, Sailing Ship of the Black Curse, and Gibbet of the Death Sentence. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frog,
Frog Peak of the Impossible Task Northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A king has three sons whom he wishes to marry off. He gives each son a golden ball to throw; wherever their ball will land, there they will have to find their bride. The Grimm Brothers wrote The three feathers, a tale that tells of a king who tests his three sons in order to choose his successor; this king blows three feathers in the air so as to indicate to the princes the direction of their research. In a Russian folktale the prince Ivan is looking for Campestre Bianco. He comes across an old man in a dark forest, and asks him for help. The old man calls onto a myriad of birds, but they do not know anything. Then the old man says: "Come now! Take this little ball of thread, throw it and lead your horse in the direction of the rolling ball" (Afanasjev, p. 208). In fairy tales these odd methods always lead to a happy ending for the main actant who follows them. This is a truth that we can experience ourselves, because to follow a desire means to try to complete an impossible task; we must go on even when reason and wisdom would stop us. It is not a matter of magic, we simply have to acknowledge that the geometry of life is not simple at all; sometimes the sense appears like a sudden grace, and we are able to solve a problem just when we are thinking of giving it up. Which is the right method to find a wife or a husband? The method of the king is not reasonable, but then again nobody could really answer this question. We suggest that the fairy tale's random method may significate the real unpredictability entailed in every marriage. The golden balls lead the elder sons to two fine wives. By contrast the ball belonging to Nicolino, the youngest brother, falls into a ditch. Nicolino wonders who to call, and half-mockingly calls out to a frog, and the frog answers, "Who is calling me?", "Nicolino who reluctantly loves you". "If you do not love me", replies the frog, "you will love me when you see how beautiful I am". The king has no objection about these three wives. He proposes three tasks, and the girl who will complete them better than the others will be queen. The succession is the explicit issue in this tale, and it is an impossible task for Nicolino, who cannot guess how a frog could ever spin, cook or raise a puppy. Nevertheless his frog does the best work, and so he gets the throne. The day of the wedding comes, and everybody laughs at Nicolino who going to the palace with a frog for a bride. The shame-filled Nicolino is waiting for the frog, who is getting dressed. But out of the dressing room comes a beautiful girl. Nicolino tells her that he was looking for a frog. "I am the frog!", anwers the beauty, and explains to the incredulous Nicolino that her curse ended because he accepted to marry her before knowing her hidden beauty. This frog is a fairy tale sister of the Frog Prince; on one side they look harmless and slimy, but on the other they are fairy creatures, since they can speak and complete impossible tasks for the prince or the princess who will marry them. In fairy tales the main actant is almost always the youngest brothers or sisters: they are despised for their looks or persecuted for their beauty; they invite the listener and the reader of their tale to listen to her/his own humble hidden side, which might enrich her/his life. We are not thinking of a certain symbolic meaning, we are merely suggesting to look at the relation between nice and noble actants and vile and wretched actants. Fairy tales wave different threads, they link creatures very far from each other, they ask the actant to walk, to work, to suffer without renouncing her/his task, commitment and desire. It is however interesting to think of the traditional symbolic meaning of the frog; it is an metamorphic amphibious animal, capable of remembering the endless movement of life. Frogs also refer to fertility. The magic in fairy tales might refer simply to the way in which life does not flow according to our command. If we follow our own desire,we are able to go on even without precisely controlling our movements, even when we have no more certainties than the princes following a ball of thread, a feather or a golden ball. A hovering feather does not give a clear direction, but it moves itself in the air, like birds and angels. The rolling balls are golden, or they hold together a very long thread; the vagueness of their rolling movement depends on their spherical shape and they are spheres like the sun and the moon. (AG; edited with the assistance of DG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Marmotta Queen Peak of the Impossible Task northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The title of this tale is dedicated to its female actant, endowed with a strong determination and a sumptuous palace. But the main actant of The Marmotta Queen is Little Andrew, the youngest child of the King of Spain. Unlike his brothers, he fulfils the task of finding the medicine to heal his father from blindness. This is an impossible task, since one has to go and find some magic water from the Isle of Tears, the cursed realm of the Marmotta Queen. This island is very far away, beyond an ocean infested by dreadful huge white bears. Therefore, the injunction of this tale is the Peak of the Impossible Task and we find it in the northeast quadrant, since the father imposes this task on the male main actant. Italo Calvino, introducing his Italian Folktales, defines The Marmotta Queen as, …the most Ariosto-like tale to come from the mouth of a man of the people. The story is an uncertain byproduct of the sixteenth-century epic, not in this plot (which in its broad outline is reminiscent of a well-known folktale) not in his fancyful geography (which also dates back to the ballads of chivalry) but in its manner of narrating, of creating magic through the wealth of descriptions of gardens and palaces (much more complete and literary in the original text than in my own highly abridged reconstruction, where I sought to avoid any appreciable divergence from the general tone of the present book. (Calvino 1980, p. xxiv) Calvino’s retelling of The Marmotta Queen is thus a highly abridged reconstruction, in comparison with the original text. Following the guidelines of the Fabulando project, namely pleasure of storytelling and philological rigour, we offer side by side Calvino’s tale and the Tuscan one, collected by Gherardo Nerucci in the 19th century (see the e-book of The Marmotta Queen). The different lengths of the two versions show how Calvino cuts out many parts of the original tale. The reader can thus see that the language of the Tuscan tale gets its liveliness both from the concreteness of popular expression and from the register of the phantastical. This mixture moves the audience's feelings, while the language of Calvino’s version is plain, scarcely modulated, missing broad descriptions and curious details. When Italo Calvino published his Italian Folktales in 1956, he realized an important cultural operation: he spread the Italian dialectal fairy-tale heritage throughout Italy. Before this work, the Italian fairy tales were only published in dialectal collections, which were – and are – little known, because the researchers wrote them down in many dialects. The dialects are now spoken by the oldest generations, while the younger ones use them less and less. To retell them in the national language made the knowledge of the Italian tales accessible to all readers, both Italian and foreign, who could more easily translate Calvino’s versions than the dialects ones. Nevertheless, we would say that he made a stylistic choice whose direction runs opposite to the one of the great 19th century collectors, from which Calvino, expressing his admiration for them, drew his fairy tales. Over a century ago, these scholars tried to highlight the linguistic and cultural contribution of every Italian region, linking texts collected in different and distant places, showing amazing ties between various narrative forms, writing down the oral language and annotating its linguistic peculiarity. Calvino chose to retell these stories in only one language, the same for all fairy tales. We do not mean his choice of Italian language instead of Italian dialects. Rather, we are noticing that what he himself defines as the general tone of the present book is couched in terms of a register that annuls the differences between the narrative structures and linguistic tones that characterize the various fairy tales told in various dialects. Considering this variety as the heart of the Italian cultural treasure, we put in our e-books side by side the original text of the Italian dialectal tales and our English translation, aiming to maintain the peculiarity of every tale. The readers who are able to read the original version, and those curious enough to try, will enjoy it. And anyway, the English translation opens a door to relish the varied narrative and linguistic world of the fairy tale. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Dying Fairy's Will Peak of the Impossible Task southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This tale from Ciociaria begins with the death of a fairy, which is a rather rare event in wonderland. Before dying she dictates her last will to her son. He should marry his three sisters to the first three men he would see passing by the house, and then he too should get married. The main male actant of this tale offers his sisters to three humble characters who take them away; they soon reveal themselves to their brides as a pig, a pigeon and a skeleton respectively. The lwill of his fairy mother seems absurd and ill omened to her son; he is not happy to have given his sisters to those strange men, and he becomes quite unhappy when an old woman puts a curse on him. He cannot get any rest until he finds Margarita bella. This is an impossible task, like the commitment of the main male actant of The Three Animal Kings, because the protagonist has no indications on how to find Margarita Bella and his three sisters. There is va lot at stake, since our main actant must also free his three brothers-in-law from their curses so as to make possible the return of his three sisters from their isolation, and free Margarita Bella from the ogre who has imprisoned her and eventually to free himself from the spell that prevents him from resting. In this fairy tale there are many magic elements, and the fairy's son, as well as his three brothers-in-law, has to deal with them, if he is to dissolve so many curses. At the end the ogre disappears, the three odd husbands transform themselves into three princes, the will of the fairy is carried out, and the curses are ended. The ogre imposes three tasks on the protagonist. Let us concentrate on the third one. The ogre permits him to spend the night with Margarita bella but he will devour the two lovers if he will not find a newborn male baby the following morning. The new couple will defeat the ogre only by proving their exceptional fertility. Their helper is the skeleton brother-in-law, who brings them a beautiful male baby before dawn. The realm of the magic characters is a supernatural world that echoes the world of nocturnal dreams, of delirium and of the underworld. It has something to do with our life, it stops us in our tracks, urging us to grow up, to become human, free from our parental injunctions, and thus finally fruitful in our own right. The injunction of this tale is the Peak of the Impossible Task, that recurs several times and is in the southeast quadrant, since the first task comes from the fairy mother of the main male actant. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Seven Little Pigeons Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The main female
actant, Cianna, wishes to find her seven brothers who
left their home when she was born, due to an oversight
of their mother's midwife. The sister finally finds her
brothers that are in service of a misogynous ogre. The
happiness of their encounter does not last for a long
time, because the seven brothers turn into seven little
pigeons, due to a mistake of Cianna. She then decides to
find the way to make her brothers human again. To
do this she must find the house where Time lives,
because he knows the secret of this metamorphosis. Along
her hard long journey, Cianna listens to creatures
asking for her help and giving her precious instructions
to get the house of Time. Then she reaches her goal: she
makes her brothers human again and grants the wishes of
the creatures that she met along her way. The same
creatures help her and her brothers again to overcome
some hurdles on their way back. This tale may be one of the most beautiful fairy tales written by Basile, both for its complex and coherent plot and for the fairy tale's ethics that it clearly displays: the main actant frees herself by freeing others, every other creature she meets along the way. Il Gran Basile presents in this fairy tale a long interesting list of predators and little birds, told by the seven brothers of Cianna to reproach her after their metamorphosis. We present an IMAGE of all these birds, and a TABLE with various Italian and English translations of the names listed by Basile, from which it is possible to open their photograph and hear their verse. (To open them, in the website Psicoanalisi e favole of Adalinda Gasparini, click the following words: IMAGE, TABLE) This fairy
tale has a female main actant and starts with an
implicit maternal injunction, so we find it in the South West quadrant. Its
injunction is the Labyrinth of
the Impossible Commitment, since Cianna
chooses by herself to make amends for the involuntary
mess due to her and her mother's oversights. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Violet Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The younger daughter of a poor man is beautiful, and the prince falls in love with her. His aim is to have her, but Violet, the main actant, is subjected neither to her family, which represents common sense, nor to the power of the son of the king. When the prince kindly greets her, she answers asserting her kind of virtue: "Bonní, figlio de lo re! io saccio chiú de te!" (Good day, King's son! I know more than you! [Violet, e-book, p. 9]). Violet tells to the regal suitor that he cannot subdue her. Common sense, represented by the father and the sisters of Violet, would stop her disrespectful attitude, which could ruin them, but they cannot stop Violety's challenge. When Violet lives with a tailor aunt, the prince, thanks to his power, persuades her to help him to get Violet, but the girl understands the trick and outwits him again. Violet, armed only with her word and her nimble resolution, could be the character of a realistic story, where magic comes on the stage when she falls in the garden of an astonishing ogre, who thinks that the beautiful girl was magically born from himself. He keeps her as his beloved daughter and gives her some fairies as teachers. These fairies could look like feminists, because they support the resolution of Violet not to submit herself. The prince tries in any way to show to Violet that he knows more than she does, but she scorns him at every turn. Then he decides to marry her, since this is the only way to possess her. The ogre and the fairies help Violet, just as any fairy-tale magic helper gives aid to the main actant who is looking for his/her own path. The main actants in fairy tales do not sacrifice anything to the idols of common sense or to powerful characters. These may represent invisible and unforeseeable talents, life resources emerging just when a subject follows his/her desire, ready to risk even her/his life. Violet cannot count on her poor father or on her fearful and envious sisters, but she has on her side the paternal tender ogre and the proto-feminist fairies. She achieves the impossible goal to be at the same level of the prince, and even to overcome him. The regal nuptials are the happy ending of the version written by Giambattista Basile, which we chose for our e-book. However, we remember a folk version of this fairy tale whic continues after the wedding. Violet knows that her prince cannot bear his defeat, and she foresees that he will take his cruel revenge on their wedding night. Violet knows that a man may marry a woman to possess her, and that to kill his wife can be his extreme act of supremacy on her. Therefore, she gets from her fairies a sugar doll looking like her, and she puts this doll in the wedding bed, and hides herself behind the curtains. The prince comes swearing at Violet, who looks deeply asleep, and claims his right to revenge, then he fatally stabs the doll thinking to kill Violet. When he decides to drink her blood he tastes the sweet liquor of the sugar doll, and he changes his mind: how can he have killed such a sweet girl? His regret and his heartache are so unbearable that he decides to stab himself, but Violet comes out and offers him all the sweetness that he thought to have lost. This fairy tale suggest something about male violence and about the possibility to tame it turning it back to love. We must however know that it is very difficult to get this kind of happy ending, if we have not on our side a tender ogre as a father and some proto-feminist fairies. The injunction of this tale is the Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment, because since the first lines of the story the subject chooses her goal. She opposes also to her father, who tries to limit her desire. Violet belongs to the northwest quadrant, being a female main actant who fights against male actants - her father and the king's son - who want her submission and personify paternal power. When the prince eventually surrenders, he leaves his royal power and acts like a young actant, giving up his hierarchical power. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
. The Golden Eagle Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The wish of the main actant, Arighetto, son of the German Emperor, is to win Lena's love. To approach her, the beautiful daughter of the King of Aragon, he builds a golden eagle and hides himself inside it. When the King gives the golden eagle to his daughter, Arighetto comes out and speaks to the princess. The princess falls in love with him and they secretely leave Spain to go to Arighetto's Empire. Then the King of Aragon declares war on the German Emperor and they call their allies to a war that involves all the European peoples. This tale shows a middle age battle, full of flags, weapons, sounds of fifes and drums, fierce duels and carnages; and chivalry always rules throughout. At the end an intevention of the pope makes peace between the enemies and we have two weddings: Arighetto with Lena, and Princivale, brother of Lena, with the daughter of the German Emperor. The tale remembers ancient epic wars, and the gracefulness of courtly love or fine amor. This 14th century Italian tale could be an introduction to the knowledge of Europe, its nations, its wars, its peace. The injuntion here is the Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment since the main actant decides by himself to follow his desire, the realization of which looks impossible. The Golden Eagle is in the northeast quadrant since the main actant is Arighetto while his antagonist is the King of Aragon, a paternal character. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Smithy
Menico Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In other fairy
tales it is told of actants who do not fear anything,
nor death. The actant of one of these tales is Dauntless Little John,
who is not afraid because he simply does not know death:
for this reason, he dies as soon as he sees his own
shadow. The actant of another tale, Little John and the Shudder,
does not know death, but he feels that he misses
something, and goes around the world looking for
shudder. He happens to marry a princess, but the happy
ending only comes when he finally feels goose bumps. The fairy tale
of Smithy Menico is in the North
East quadrant, because St. Peter represents
during the whole tale the antagonist paternal character,
disapproving the choices of our cunning fellow Smithy
Menico. The injunction of this tale is the Labyrint of the Impossible
Commitment. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Master Bëninhë Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On the website of The Royal Society Publishing House we can read something about a piece of research (Comparative phylogenetic analyses uncover the ancient roots of Indo-European folktales. Sara Graça da Silva, Jamshid J. Tehrani, 2016), that tells of how some fairy-tales were spread many centuries before their recording. Notably, the story of The Smith and the Devil - the type of this story of Master Bëninhë - who is a fairy-tale brother of Smithy Menico - has been told since the Bronze Age (3300-1200 b. C.). Let us note that among people without writing - and without codified literature - the narrative patterns collected by travelers and scholars are at the same time religious stories, myths, fairy-tales, apologues, and moralistic tales. We think of fairy tales as a specific genre - notably, European fairy-tales, that colonizers and missionaries spread all over the world - were born in the 16th century, which is the century of the Protestant Reformations and of the Catholic Roman Counter-Reformation. The method followed by the authors of the research cited above does not take into account any difference between fairy tales, legends, myths, apologues, and religious stories - narrated as true and identifying a certain people in a certain period. It is however interesting to follow a narrative type through a biological method - which is mainly applied to understand the human migrations through DNA. What we can know for sure is that the stories of the human being who forges metals have been, since the dawn of time, associated with the human ability to fool or cheat supernatural powers, like the Devil and Death. Technical expertise and intelligence - released from common thought, often frightened by the unknown (is there anything more unknown than Death?) - are at the heart of our human condition, paradoxical or miraculous, perennially exiled from grace and yet able to deserve it by overcoming apparently insurmountable obstacles. Homo faber fortunae suae, as a Latins said: the blacksmith represents the man who, thanks to his power over fire, can forge metals. The first human beings did it with metals from meteorites - their origin was celestial, as in the latin word sidera, from which the English word sideritic - then with metals from the ground, extracted from Mother Earth's womb. The master smith works what he extracts with his own tools - and so he is a maker - smith, faber - of his own destiny. Coming back to our fairy tale, Master Bëninhë - benigno, benign well disposed, nomen est omen - in a rainy night hosts a whole group of wayfarers, without knowing that they are Jesus, the Master, St. Peter and other disciples. He warms them, feeds them and quenches their thirst: feeding the hungry is one of the seven works of mercy. Nor would he ask for anything in return, if it were not for the suggestion of St. Peter. But unlike the magical items mostly requested and obtained in fables, what Master Bëninhë asks and gets is only to multiply the duration of his life: he does not seek any dominion over objects or other living beings. It seems that Master Bëninhë shows us a difficult and luminous truth: the true good, the only one, is life itself. Thanks to his magical objects, the master blacksmith multiplies his life eight times, before following Death, this time without jokes, when Master Jesus sends Death for the third time to bring him away from this world. This ancient homo faber appears to us as a magnificent homo laicus, not only when we see that for master Bëninhë the greatest good of life is life itself, but also when we see how he behaves in the after-life. Simpler - perhaps also more elegant - than his Fabulando brother, Smithy Menico, Master Bëninhë is not blasphemous, nor does he ignore his own limits. Jesus Christ - named as the Master, capital letter - undoubtedly knows how the blacksmith Bëninhë could use them. The blacksmith Bëninhë - master with the small letter -, who bends metals with fire, stands in front of the Master with all the dignity that a human being can express. He handles the fire that Prometheus stole for him from the gods. The dignity of our little blacksmith is made of the same stuff of the great literary subject that has enjoyed and still enjoys a universal and uninterrupted fortune: Nobody, Odysseus, Ulysses. Master Bëninhë is a fairy tale, not a sapiential story, only a fairy tale belonging to the literary genre that appeared in the century of the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation, as we said above. Nonetheless, the way this main actant of a fairy tale tells us that the greatest good of life is life itself, moves and cheers us up more than the exhortation of any apologist or sapiential story.. Someone, a blacksmith generous and never greedy, who recognizes divine power, was able to forge his destiny, asking and obtaining for himself a part of divine power: power to repel Death and the Devil, to extend life - he multiplies its duration by eight - to enter Paradise fooling Saint Peter. If Master Bëninhë is entitled - in the name of God! - to enter Paradise thanks to his magic rucksack, St. Peter, who has forgotten the third gift obtained by the blacksmith, may lament his own simple-mindedness. This is St. Peter's character, which is the ordinary folk character, who often forgets things that people like our master blacksmith never forget. We risk an analogy, seeing in St. Peter together with the master blacksmith a couple descending from the great mythical couple of the titanic brothers Prometheus and Epimetheus. If St. Peter forgot that the backpack of master Bëninhë had been enchanted, this forgetfulness of his is not more serious than that which, according to the Gospels, made him forget his Master, when he denied Jesus three times in the night when his Master was tortured. God, the Master, loves to play with the master, who in turn plays well thanks to the divine spark of intelligence, just as the Master loves the man who repudiated Him, because he was weak and afraid. Jesus appointed St Peter, the a common man, his heir on earth and porter of Paradise. The simple St. Peter does not understand this taste for the game shared by his Master and by a human master, but he has to accept it, together with master Bëninhë entering Paradise. This story could be understood as a hymn to life, which corresponds to the hymn to the life of the community that has handed it down to us, the Occitans of Guardia Piemontese, in Calabria. After escaping from Piedmont, their place of origin, during the persecutions of the Waldensians in the 12th century, these Protestants openly manifested their religion centuries later, at the time of the Reformation, to undergo a short time later persecution during the Counter-Reformation. The few who were left alive, converted by force,were forbidden from professing their religion and speaking their language, and were forgotten. Nonetheless, the surviving members of the small Protestant community kept their traditions alive, until a demologue - as was te name for researchers of folk traditions in the late 19th century - recognized the amazing presence of Occitan speakers in Calabria. The damnatio memoriae of the Counter Reformation period was not successful, despite a Jesuit monastery being erected nearby, whose friars could use a peephole that opened from the outside into the houses of the descendants of the Protestants to check that nobody was contravening the rules imposed by Catholic authority. (AG, 04/02/2018) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Three Animal
Kings Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tittone, a prince, is the main actant of this fairy tale. He takes on the impossible commitment of finding his three sisters who had left the realm before his birth. Three animal kings forced the king to give them his daughters to marry, and they took them so far away, that nobody had never had any news about them. After a long way, Tittone finds his sisters, one after the other, who are happy to see and host him in their husbands' wonderful palaces. Their husbands, who are a hawk, a deer and a dolphin, give him a magic present taking it from their own skin when he takes his leave. They endow him with a feather, a hair and a scale, saying that he should use them to get their aid when he will not know what else to do. Along the way Tittone sees a beautiful princess who asks for his help; because a dreadful dragon holds her captive. Tittone falls in love at first sight with the princess, and he calls on the three animal kings for help. Thanks to their magic powers, they defeat and kill the dragon, free the princess, and eventually destroy the awful place where the princess was imprisoned. The happy ending of this tale, one of the most popular tales all over Europe, consists of four happy nuptials of the youths, with the four couples of their royal parents who had thought to have lost their successors forever. The injunction of this fairy tale is the Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment. The main male actant decides to leave by himself; however he answers to an implicit maternal request; the mother queen gave her daughters three identical rings to give them the possibility of recognizing their relatives; she gives her son the same ring when he leaves to look for his sisters. Therefore the tale is located in the southeast quadrant, as is The Dying Fairy's Will, which has the same plot and the same quadrant as The Three Animal Kings, but a different injuction. Tittone, as we said, decides to leave by himself, while the male main actant of The Dying Fairy's Will embarks on his quest after the spell of an old woman. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Romany Violet Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you read the English translation of this fairy tale, you can only catch a glimpse of the Romany heritage which makes this tale different from the same type of popular fairy tales belonging to the Italian or the European traditions. Violet has its prototype in Violet by Giambattista Basile, and if you would like to feel something of the Romany tradition you should read the Romany text. The story of the cunning peasant girl, who is able to best the king in the administration of justice and to win his anger with a lovely ruse, reminds us of the novella of Griselda. If the heroin of the hundredth novella of Boccaccio is endowed with a superhuman patience, Violet is endowed with a superhuman cunning, and the same ultra-capacity of Griselda not to oppose frontally the male ruler, her husband, who does not tolerate being contradicted by her in the exercise of his kingly power. Her lovely cunning reminds us of the ending of the popular versions of Violetta, missing in Basile's. The main female actant knows that her suitor married her out of the desire for revenge, because she has never yielded to him. Therefore, she puts in her place in the marriage bed a doll made of sugar and filled with honey. The king, still angry for not having been able to defeat her, stabs the doll, and licks her blood on the blade. But when he tastes such sweetness he repents and regrets killing such a sweet wife. He would kill himself, but his bride jumps out of hiding and runs to embrace him. Therefore they live happily ever after. (See in Fabulando the appendix that we added to the end of Basile's Violet. See also, in the collection of Giuseppe Pitrè the Sicilian fairy tale on line La grasta di lu basilicò). The main actant is a female and her action is related to her father - who does not understand her - and to her husband: therefore, we see it in the southwest quadrant. Its injunction is the Labyrinth of the impossible commitment because her action depends on her choice more than on the male character's actions, as in Basile's Violet. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catarina
the Wise Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Prince, husband of Catarina the Wise, introduces
their fairy tale
I had gone to the school of Catarina the Wise with all my good will, and I thought she would feel honored to have the Crown Prince among her pupils. And instead she gave me a slap when I was unable to answer her first question. I, a man, a prince of royal blood, could not let slip such an affront by the daughter of a merchant. If she had repented, I would have forgiven her, but she threatened to beat me again! She would obey me, by force if not for love. And so, I married her and locked her down in the underground icehouse, but she still did not repent, as if she did not feel the cold and hunger. I could not understand how she could resist there, in the underground icehouse. Maybe she had contrived a way to resist without eating. And so, I left for Naples, then for Genoa, then for Venice, trying to forget Catarina. But wherever I went, I always found a beautiful lady who looked exactly like her, and that's why I fell in love with those ladies and married them. With these women, I sired three children. In those days, in the realm of fairy tales, we crown princes could do that, didn't you know? But as much as I could take three wives, and keep Catarina in my icehouse jail, I could not tame her. Every time I returned to my palace I went to ask Catarina if she had repented, but she always answered no, and every time she was more beautiful and witty than ever. I had decided to marry a princess from England, but right at the start of the wedding Catarina appeared and introduced to me our three children, two princes, Napoli and Genova, and a princess, Venezia. Oh dear! Catarina had always been my wife, whereas I thought I had married three different women! She was really wise, and I, in order to have her love and to love her in return, resigned myself not to command her. In fairy tales, equality between males and females, wives and husbands, nobles and bourgeois, has existed for centuries. They told me that now this equality is a common right: there is no longer any need to fight for it, as Catarina did, traveling throughout Italy on those slender and fast brigantines. But is it really true? (AG) (English translation by AG, from Sorgente di meraviglie. Fiabe antiche e popolari nei diversi idiomi d'Italia. Volume I: Sicilia. A cura di Claudia Chellini e Adalinda Gasparini. Foschi Editore: Forlì 2018. ll principe commenta la fiaba di Caterina la sapiente, pp.118-119) When the utopia of Humanism and Renaissance set, and Protestant Reforms together with Catholic Counter-Reformation spread all over Europe, the freedom obtained by women disappeared, but found shelter in the new-born literary genre of fairy tales. We find an ancient version of Catarina the Wise in The Facetious Nights of Giovan Francesco Straparola, the first book printed in Europe including modern fairy tales. Straparola could be a nome de plume for a delegate of the powerful Venetian Republic who had spent many years in a Near East Arab country, and he could have known stories belonging to One Thousand Nights and One Night. In the Arabic collection you may meet a Muslim demon, a jinn, ready to serve good Muslims. The Devil of the fairy tale of Straparola has a concern for the woman he carries from Florence to Flanders that is absolutely uncommon for a Catholic devil: nevertheless it might come from the Arabic presence in Sicily, where they reigned from nineth to eleventh century. (See also, in the website Psicoanalisi e favole: Isabella and Ortodosio, Night the Seventh, the First Fable) (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Red Riding Hood Fork of the Possible Task southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does anyone know the previous version of this fairy tale, by Perrault, with no hunter, where the girl ends in the belly of the wolf for ever after? Perrault wrote also a conclusion, a warning to girls, not to give in to the lure of their suitors, who threaten their chastity. Red Riding Hood should not stop to listen to her wolf, and good girls should not listen to their suitors, who are more dangerous when they look polite and courteous. This edifying morality does not deplete the rich meaning of this popular tale, misunderstood by a pedagogical interpretation that looks at the wolf as a paedophile. Little Red Riding Hood defines herself by her name and her red garment, and by her movement into the female element. The girl never comes out of the maternal range; her mother sends her to her grandmother, and her path she is supposed to follow goes into the wood, the realm of Mother Nature. The task looks possible: simply bringing a cake and some butter to a grandmother, but in this maternal world there is a devouring beast. The wolf here represents the destructive side of the Mother. We could think of the Indian goddess Kali, or of Lilith in the Jewish tradition; we could think of so many mother or stepmothers, who in fairy tales try to get rid of their daughters as soon as they grow up and cast a shadow on their supremacy. We should also remember that Mother Earth is the goddess that gives food and life, but she also incorporates dead bodies. Freud wrote that the man meets the woman in three forms: the mother, the wife and the earth; it is the third that take him definitively in her arms. Mother Nature includes Death, in the shape of the Wolf. This cannibalistic beast has nothing to do with the beautiful wild animal risking extinction, as well as the hunter in fairy tales has nothing to do with today's hunters. Any pedagogical confusion between them engenders confusion among children about what is dangerous for themselves. Red Riding Hood follows the maternal injunction, and her mother does not warn her to avoid Nature's dangers. This injunction drives the main actant to death, because the parents protect here their children giving them simple tasks or teaching them how to avoid any danger. This parental care looks good, but fairy tales work in many dimensions, not only on the surface. The child who lacks its own desire or its own thought cannot develop as a free subject, and death is its imminent destiny. Let us now think of the best-known version of this tale, where a hunter comes to kill the cannibalistic wolf and cut its belly, so that Red Riding Hood and her grandmother come out through a kind of Caesarean Section. The maternal realm is more dangerous when it looks quite harmless, and its hidden danger is lethal for the growing subject. Nevertheless, if a paternal character comes, he can help her or him to get a happy ending, thanks to his knife, his skill, and his knowledge of the wood. We come to life thanks to the maternal nature and we become human subjects through maternal nourishment and paternal culture. We should not literally identify these two generators with a concrete couple, like a mother and a father. A parent can give a child both these signifiers, while two parents may be unable to do it. The confusion between the symbolic and the concrete presence of the maternal and the paternal figures prevents the understanding of fairy tales as well as of the children's needs, that take place in these precious popular tales. (AG) See also, the e-kamishibai of this fairy tale, which is available via its fairy tale map. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dauntless Little John Fork of the Possible Task northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Italo Calvino opens his collection of Italian fairy tales with this tale, and he explains why he does not quote his sources: the story is very popular all over Italy, and his version follows this manifold tradition. He writes: Not only for that reason have I put this tale first, but also because it is one of the simplest and, in my view, one of the most beautiful folktales. It does not bat an eye, like its imperturbable main character; it distinguishes itself from the innumerable ghost stories, full of deaths and spectres, because it deals with the supernatural with a still steadiness that deems everything possible, without any subjection to the unknown.. (Calvino 1956, p. 85; English translation ours) In his Introduction Calvino, who places himself as the last ring of a long chain of storytellers, affirms that …fairy tales are true. They are all together a general explanation of life, with their always repeated and always varied records of human happenings. (Ibid, p. 15) If we acknowledge the still steadiness of little John in front of the unknown, we must also acknowledge that he does not know anything about his own shadow. Moreover, he does not know anything about his backside. The most popular version of Dauntless Little John tells that he dies of fear when he allows without any fear that somebody cut and reattach his head, because his head is reattached back-to-front and he sees his dreadful backside. Why Calvino did not tell anything about the evident death by fear of his Little John? He is scared to death in the face of something that belongs to everyone, something that children know well, like one’s own shadow or backside. To be afraid of one's own shadow means to be fearful, and this happens to people who repress fear. They may look brave, or at least imperturbable, facing the unknown, in the same way that Little John looks to Calvino. I have told this tale to many children, and their amusement is due to the contrast between the amazing calmness of Little John in front of ghosts and deaths that fall through the chimney, and his being scared to death in front of his shadow or his backside. Boys and girls would never spend a night by themselves in a cursed castle, but they are not afraid of their shadow, and they laugh hearing that somebody may die looking at it. (See also, in Fairy Tales at a School, website Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole) Our shadow and our backside are what always follows us, unseen, even unknown, like our unconscious; if we think that it does not exist, it annihilates us, suddenly bursting into our lives. Which boy would agree to let somebody cut his head? Dauntless John may look like a supernatural, imperturbable being, as he is considered by Calvino. When children listen to this tale, they may feel ashamed of their own fears, but they rejoice when the dauntless actant dies for something that they know and see without any fear, like their shadow and their backside. We would ascribe this Calvino's lack of attention to a common pedagogical ideal that sees our psychic life only within our consciousness. However, the unknown Unheimliche, the unconscious, exists. It structures us, even if we try to repress the perception of it. We could try to ignore the unheimliche unsettling mystery of the night, of sleep, of dreams, and of nightmares, of ghosts and of deaths that appear frightening to us, but we will never live a day without darkness and shadows, without a backside that follows us. We included this version by Calvino of Dauntless Little John in Fabulando because it stresses a pedagogic illusion, expressed by those parents that try to reassure their child afraid of the night simply asserting that there is no reason to be afraid. This attitude may seem realistic, but it is very far from reality, because life is full of risks and dangers, even if we do not think of the dread we feel when a nightmare unsettles our sleep. We discover very soon that death could hit anyone, and this is the root of all our different fears. The Indian epic poem Mahabharata tells that the greatest miracle is that we know that we could die in any moment but we nearly live as if we were immortal. Human dignity rests on the space opened up by the word nearly. The subject who lives without fear of death does not know this space at all, but fear is the hidden master of his life. Dauntless Little John does not know death or fear; for this reason he is imperturbable, and for this same reason he dies the first time he looks at his shadow, which is what, unseen, always follows him. In an ancient version of this tale, the first one published in the world, we can find a key to understand it better, the 16th century Italian fairy tale - the Fourth one of the Fifth Night - from The Facetious Night by Giovan Francesco Straparola. (Flamminio senza paura, website Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole). A fairy tale homonym of Little John is the main actant of the tale Little John and the Shudder, (See also, by A.G., La fiaba, la morte, la paura: un fuoco, un tornio, un banco da ebanista, San Miniato, Pisa, 1994). This tale belongs to the injunction Fork of the Possible Task. No parental actant orders the main actant to do anything, but the illusory ease of living without any fear is the result of the lack of a father, of his word and of the law that he embodies. For the same reason this fairy tale is in the northeast quadrant. Here the missing parents cause the ignorance of any limit that leads Little John to live without any fear. Appearing dauntless, he represents a thoughtless condition. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thus Ended the Idiot Fork of the Possible Task southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In fairy tales, an idiot boy, like the dauntless actant, may meet two opposite fortunes. The difference depends on his parents; his tale has a happy ending if the parents have uselessly tried to educate him and then banish him. The idiot has no happy ending if his only parent, usually a mother, tries to do everything to compensate for her son's dumbness, thinking of his risks as of something that she can foresee and overcome by teaching him some simple instructions. In this dialectal Umbrian tale, the main actant memorizes the words of his mother and repeats them without thinking about the context in which he utters them. People beat him, and when he asks what he should have said, they teach him a different sentence that he memorizes instead of his mother's one. However, each of this sentences is out of sync when it is used by him, and people beat him again, and again he memorizes a new sentence, good for that circumstance, bad for the new one he is living. This tale could represent the lethal power of the Freudian repetition compulsion, Thanatos. The dumb boy has no desire and no thought save his mother's, and he consequently never doubts her instructions. There is no chance for him to learn from experience, because we can learn something only if we feel ourselves free to feel and think in a way that may be different from what our parents or other masters teach us. During our whole life, we build up this subjectivation, and the death of the dumb boy could be equivalent to the anguishing experience of our blind failures. If we can bear to be disillusioned about the assurances of our parents, if we stop believing them, our subjectivity can emerge and live. It is very interesting that this tale totally concerns language, with a dumb boy who does not know its polysemous and ambiguous nature. A subject can emerge and grow up only if s/he can understand this about language and learn how to deal with it. Fairy tales are thus ambiguous like language, whatever they might really mean, and the choice to give an interpretation is always subjective and questionable, or falsifiable. We would finally stress that the poor dumb boy ends his life when he bumps into a blacksmith who is trying to light some wet brushwood. The idiot is coming from a town where a house was burning, and people taught him to say, “May God put it out". The human heir of the forge-god Vulcan cannot bear this dumbness, and taking a hammer he kills him. We remember a Latin sentence totally unheeded by the dumb boy and his mother: unusquisque faber fortunae suae, every man forges his own fortune. Children have their own thoughts, and they may feel guilty if they see that these thoughts are different from their parent's: this rich Umbrian tale reinvigorates their rising subjectivity, and it reassures them about the guilty nature of their independent thoughts, since the tale comes from an authority, be it a parent, a teacher, a book or a tablet. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Ridiculous Wishes Forest of the Exile Northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fabulando collection includes this fairy tale, even if it does not introduce any parent or child. The theme of Succession, in the sense of a hierarchical relationship between powerful and poor actants, is here represented by the relation between a supernatural actant - a god here, a fairy in other versions of this story - and a poor actant - a woodcutter. Something should go from the strong actant to the weak one, as in the relationship between parents and children. In Smithy Menico the donor actant is Jesus and the weak actant is a poor smith. The Ridiculous Wishes might belong more to the fable genre than to the fairy-tale one, to be considered as a cunning apologue about the ambiguity of desire. Let us quote a renowned sentence by George Bernard Shaw, "There are two tragedies in life. One is to lose your heart's desire. The other is to gain it." Our story tells that Jove, King of Olympus, appears to a poor woodcutter and tells that he will grant him three wishes. The man goes home and tells his wife what happened, and they agree that they will think carefully the following night before choosing what they can ask Jove. But the woodcutter exclaims that he would like a sausage, and a sausage appears in his dish, satisfying his first wish. Since his wife violently rails against him for having wasted one desire, the man shouts, Could it stick to your nose! And the sausage sticks to her nose. Now the woodcutter can cast only one wish, and he thinks about asking to become king of a big realm, with castles and servants and estates. But he then thinks that he would have a queen with a sausage hanging from her nose, an he eventually decides to use his third wish to turn his wife back to her nice old looks. If you look at the figure of this story's e-book, you see how the sausage is a grotesque phallic appendage, which is caused by the couple quarrel, and vanishes with their agreement. We hear of wishes that are wasted, of course, but perhaps anything but ridiculous. Noticing that Jove gave no limit to the woodcutter's three desires, we can think of a dirty trick, because no human desire exists without limits, since it comes from lack. The Ridiculous Wishes played a role in the debut of Charles Perrault as a writer of fairy tales. He wrote in 1691 Griselidis. Nouvelle, a free verse translation of the hundreth novella of the Decameron. Boccaccio's Griselda has been retold, painted and set to music by writers, painters and musicians ever since Boccaccio's time (including Francesco Petrarca, Geoffrey Chaucer, the Master of Griselda, Antonio Vivaldi, and Domenico Scarlatti). In 1693 Perrault wrote The Ridiculous Wishes (Les souhaites ridicules), and in 1694 he published it together with Griseldis (Griselidis), adding a third new story, Donkey Skin (Peau d'Ane). So, Donkey Skin is the first fairy tale written and published by Perrault, three years before the first edition of his renowned Les Contes de ma Mère l'Oye. In the upcoming Grand Tour "A Forgotten Desire crossing Novella and Fairy Tale. From Griselda to the Green Beaubird", we will resume this topic, to which we have now made only a first hint. The little story of the woodcutter and his wife who could get anything and get nothing, is then quoted twice in 1919 by Sigmund Freud. About his interest in folk tales (see also The Theme of the Three Caskets. SE, 12: 291-301 [Das Motif der Kästchenwahl 1913]), we will resume this topic in the upcoming Grand Tour of the (non) Ridiculous Wishes. In a note added to the Interpretation of Dreams, 1919 edition, he quotes The Ridiculous Wishes after these words, in order to briefly explain them: No doubt, a wish-fulfillment must bring pleasure; but the question then arises 'To whom?' To the person who has the wish, of course. But as we know, a dreamer's relation to his wishes is a quite peculiar one. He repudiates them and censors them - in short, he doesn't like them. Their fulfillment can therefore give him no pleasure, but just the opposite; and experience shows that this opposite appears in the form of anxiety, something still to be explained. Thus, in his relation to his dream-wishes, a dreamer can only be compared to an amalgamation of two separate people linked by some important common element. We eventually think that the short simplicity of the three ridiculous wishes may be illusory, like the seeming simplicity of the Sphynx's riddle, solved by Oedipus. As the desires can be fulfilled, but not exhausted, so the secrets can be revealed, but only in the moment they hide themselves again. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flower and Flowerstem Forest of the Exile Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Here we have two beautiful youth, Flower and her brother Flowerstem. Their mother died and their father married a woman who persecutes her stepchildren. She eventually turns them out of the house, because her daughter is ugly and she cannot stand their beauty. Let us read this beginning, common to many tales – the most famous is Cinderella -, as something difficult to express, namely a mix of love and hate towards the mother figure. Fairy tales often stage two actants to tell this ambivalent connection: a dead good mother, who may reappear as a fairy – it happens in this tale of ours -, and a bad mother, usually a stepmother. This bad mother acts in the tale and the main actants have to face her to grow up and become independent, able to get their happy ending. In Flower and Flowerstem, we have a female main actant and a female parental injunction, therefore this tale is in the southwest quadrant. Its injunction is the Forest of the Exile, because the adventure of Flower and Flowerstem begins when they are cast out of their home. They have always been beautiful, but their stepmother turns them out of home after a special event. One time they go to a fountain to draw water, and meet twelve fairies who ask them for a bit of the flatbread they are eating. Then Flower divides her flatbread in twelve pieces and gives it to the fairies, without keeping even a little bit for herself. To reward Flower, the fairies give her three gifts: whenever she speaks, flowers will blossom on her lips; whenever she unwinds her braids, a cascade of golden pearls will fall from her hair, and the son of the king will marry her. When the good mother dies and an envious stepmother takes her place, the actants usually meet a magic female actant, who can either damage them or fulfil their wishes. Fairy tales say that when the actants honour these magic helpers, they are always rewarded with something precious. Let us now try to understand what this story is telling about this theme. We noticed the mix of love and hate belonging to the mother-daughter relation. The mother's death means the loss of the all-good mother, and the fairies represent her donor side, while the stepmother represents the mother's destructive side. In this real relationship, to unravel the tangle of these feelings is nearly impossible, because they are interconnected, belonging both to mother and daughter, and they are mainly repressed, therefore unconscious. Fairy tales stage an innocent beautiful daughter and a bad ugly stepmother, therefore the blame of the aggressiveness lies on the older woman, while in real life it belongs also to the daughter, who tries to overcome her mother. We know that growing away from her mother is necessary to any daughter in order to become an independent subject. It is the only way to find her place in the world, but this parting is painful. The daughter has to give up the feeling of security that she received as a child from the strong tie with her mother. Like a mirror, the mother offers herself to her little girl, so that she can build up her identity. That sense of security and that reflection entail the unconditional adherence to a female model, and the little daughter thinks impossible to move away from this model, because this is the only way she knows herself. But growing up she feels the uncontrollable urge to set off and find her own way. This desire entails an aggressiveness, and the daughter wavers: should she follow it or fight against it? The daughter someway feels her separation as an aggression against her mother, and ascribing her own aggressiveness to the maternal figure she can think she is quite innocent, and therefore become able to find the impulse necessary to leave her. We can now appreciate how fairy tales stage this dangerous vital mix of deep feelings, which often cannot be spoken. Thrown out of her home, even though she is now the promised bride of the king, Flower suffers another aggression from her stepmother. She makes Flower fall into the hands of the Sea Siren, a mermaid who kidnaps beautiful girls, while her ugly stepsister takes her place and marries the king. The journey of Flower towards her happy ending is not complete. She has to live for some time with the powerful magic creature who captured her. The Sea Siren is another maternal actant, which in other variants of this fairy tale the girl calls “mother” (see Ciciruni, collected in Palermo by Giuseppe Pitrè, in Internet Archive). To get its happy ending, the fairy tale needs now a male actant, Flowerstem, who acts as an intermediary between his sister and the king, as he did when he was selling Flower’s flowers. In this part of the story, the gifts of the fairies are again precious, because the golden pearls coming from Flower’s hair feed the king’s geese. Flowerstem is their guardian, and the geese, coming back to the palace, tell how the beautiful Flower has nurished them with golden pearls. When the king learns what happened, he frees Flower facing the Sea Siren, not only thanks to his courage, but also because Flower reveals him how to do it. Let us notice this passage: he determines her liberation, and without him, Flower would still be on the seashore, imprisoned by the Sea Siren. But he would not know how to do it if she had not provided him with the right information. This story tells that when a girl has to face a persecutor mother, which is powerful like this female sea monster, a male actant has to act and help her, however following the knowledge that the female actant has learnt from the magic being (see also Parsley). It eventually tells that a female main actant can never get a happy ending if she does not learn to act with others and share what she knows. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Cockroach, the
Mouse and the Cricket Forest of the Exile Northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Every fairy tale can be read at various levels, and every level displays a meaning. It can be interpreted in psychoanalytic terms, depending on whether you subscribe to Freudian, Jungian, Kleinian or Lacanian theory. A fairy tale looks manageable, like a centuries-old humble form patiently waiting for the hermeneutics of a learned scholar. There is no damage, because the extraordinary vitality of this narrative form does not depend on any interpretation, and every reading can make sense provided that the scholars are not too sure of their own method and theory. If they force the fairy tale’s complexity into their particular interpretation, trying to exhaust its meaning, they lose the fairy tale itself, which disappears easily slipping out of their hermeneutic exercise. Sometimes fairy tales, like poetry and dreams, delude us into thinking we have glimpsed their source, but they slip out of our grasp, making our interpretation insignificant. Hoping to resist this temptation, which loses its sense just when it seizes it, we propose our interpretation of The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket, which is one of the most beautiful, hilarious tales of Basile’s collection. It tells of a merchant and his only son, Nardiello, who is so silly and idle that he has already squandered one half of his father’s riches, gambling and hanging about with prostitutes and innkeepers, making fun of him to get to his money. After having tried with no success to convince him to stop this inane behaviour, his father sends him to the market of Salerno, providing him with one hundred ducats to buy some calves, so that he could start breeding livestock, so as to become so rich that he might even buy a noble title. Nardiello sets off on his journey, but he sees, not far from home, a fairy who is having fun with a cockroach playing a little guitar, better than all the musicians of his time. Craving for this magic animal, Nardiello gives the fairy the hundred ducats and buys the cockroach, then he goes back home to tell his father what a good deal he made. His father, seeing nothing but an insect, does not give Nardiello even the time to show him the cockroach's virtuosity, and starts yelling at him. But later he provides him again with one hundred ducats, warning him not to stop before he reaches the market of Salerno. Once again, Nardiello falls in love with a little animal, a mouse who dances so skilfully and delightfully that he gives its owner fairy his hundred ducats to get it. But when his father sees a mouse, he loses patience and scolds him. Nonetheless, he gives Nardiello the same amount for the third time, warning him that he will punish very harshly a third mistake. For the third time Nardiello gives a fairy all his hundred ducats, to get her singer cricket, whose voice is so melodious that it can send everybody to sleep. This time the father, seeing this third insane purchase, loses all patience, and gives him such a savage beating that Nardiello escapes from him and runs away from home. The paternal upbringing failed. Nardiello choses the exile, getting his way with nothing but his three miniature artists. When he hears of a king who promised the hand of his daughter to whomever will make her laugh - the sad princess had not laughed for seven years -, he decides to try the test, even if those who fail it must die. The performance of the guitarist cockroach, of the dancing mouse and the singing cricket, makes the melancholic princess laugh, but the king becomes sad, since he does not want the wretched Nardiello to become his son-in-law. Therefore he says that Nardiello has to pass another test: if he is not able to consummate the marriage within three days, he will die. “I am not afraid,” said Nardiello, “for in that time I am man enough to consummate the marriage, thy daughter and all thine house.” (The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket e-book, p. 45) But Nardiello does not notice that the king puts some opium into his wine, and he soundly sleeps for three nights. He therefore gets a place in the lion’s den, instead of the princess’ bed. Knowing that he is going to die, Nardiello opens the small box where he keeps the cockroach, the mouse and the cricket, and tells them that he wants to set them free.Art cures melancholy, not only in fairy tales. Music has always been considered a remedy against the ancient disease that somehow corresponds to today’s depression, furthermore, art therapy is a contemporary cure for diseases. In this fairy tale of ours, the three little artists allow the misfit spender Nardiello to overcome where all the others failed. But this brings him into the lion’s den. The value of art can look negligible for common sense, and it can be underrated by rulers, as for example by an Italian minister who some years ago declared that you can’t eat culture. But we can see that art survives for centuries and millennia, after the kings and merchants, who failed to appreciate its strength and value, disappeared. It is true that there are no guarantees of success or of good luck for those who possess and exercise an art, like Nardiello, who keeps his magic artists inside a little box. Until the time when - Basile tells in this wonderful fairy tale - he releases the art itself, so that it can live beyond his own death. Now the cockroach, the mouse and the cricket have no master, no fairy or a poor devil sentenced to death. This for them is the right time to speak. They tell Nardiello that they want to reward him, because to get them he gave away all his money, he tenderly protected and nourished them, and eventually he gave them freedom, which is the most precious gift. Then they repeat their performance, and if the first time they cured the princess, now they tame the lions, which immobilize themselves. Their art repeats the miracle of Orpheus, the artist par excellence in Greek mythology, whose music enchanted the wild animals too. While the lions stand like statues, the little artists lead Nardiello out of the den, to a safe haven, and they ask him what they could do for him. Nardiello asks them to prevent the new bridegroom of the princess from consummating the marriage, because this would consummate his own life. Now the scatological enterprise of the three little animal artists begins, and their magic consists of cunning and operations that correspond to their physical abilities, to remain invisible thanks to their small size, not to shy away from dirt, to gnaw, using also their artistic expertise. The king had just married his daughter to a German nobleman, who on the first night falls soundly asleep . The guitar-playing cockroach acts as a suppository for him, ...in such
wise that he could have said with Petrarca, “From love
it extracted thence a subtle liquid”. The sapper cockroach changes the royal alcove into a sickening place, and the second night the defence of the bridegroom, who barricades his orifice with a trench of bands, clothes and underpants, is useless. If the cockroach cannot enter like the first night, the mouse steps up, and gnawing at the trench he opens a breach for him, so that the insect, … gave him another medicinal dose, in such a guise that a topaz sea came forth, and the Arabian perfumes infected the whole palace. The bride being tainted with such odour awoke, and sighting the orange deluge which had coloured the white Holland sheets to Venetian tabby, holding her nose, flew to the chamber of her handmaidens. The wretched bridegroom, calling the valets, loudly and at length lamented his misfortune, that through a lax foundation the greatness of his house would be closed (ibid., pp. 65-67). To prepare himself for the third night, the bridegroom blocks his orifice with a custom made wood plug, resolving to stay up not to lose control. Now the cricket takes action, sending the German groom to sleep with his sweet singing, but the mouse, finding a barrage that he cannot open with his teeth, cannot make way for the cockroach. Then the mouse goes to the larder and dips his tail into a jar of mustard, and then he rubs his tail several times under the nose of the bridegroom, …and he began to sneeze so loudly and strongly, that the stopper came forth in a fury, and as he lay with his back turned to the bride, it struck her mid-breast with such a blow that it nearly slew her. And she screamed and screeched, and at her screams the king ran in, and enquired of her what ailed her. She told him that a petard had been shot at her breast. And the king marvelled with excessive marvel at such a folly, and wondered how a petard on her chest she could speak; and lifting the bed-clothes, he found the bran mine, and the petard's stopper which had hit the bride, and made a good mark in her breast; although I know not which caused her more disgust, the stink of the powder, or the blow from the ball (ibid., pp. 79-81). Then the king
chases away the German nobleman. The king gets upset
thinking that that disaster came from his unfair death
sentence, and misses the innocent Nardiello. The three
little magic animals promptly come to cheer him up,
telling him that the legitimate pretender is alive and
that they are ready to go and get him. Then they turn
him into a handsome youth, worthy husband of the
princess, and all live happily ever after. Basile devotes
more than one third of this tale to the scatological war
operation of the three little animals, who act for the
sake of Nardiello, who loves them and takes care of
them. They return his love leading him to conquer the
princess and defeat all his opponents. Italy has, with Lo cunto de li cunti or Pentamerone by Basile, the most ancient, rich and artistic book of fairy tales, by mutual consent of the foreign critics who know this subject. (Croce, in: Basile, 1974; our translation) So Benedetto
Croce in 1925 introduced his complete translation of
Basile’s collection, the first Italian one, which we
still consider the most beautiful. An introduction by
Italo Calvino enriched the 1974 edition of this text,
but the Italian writer never read Basile’s text:
“Moreover," he wrote, "I am dealing with a book of
Basile-Croce, because I know the first only through the
second one” (ibid., vol. I, p. V; our translation). Basile's work resembles the dream of a hideous Neapolitan Shakespeare, obsessed with the horrible, so that ogres and witches are never enough, with a taste for the tortuous grotesque image, where the sublime mingles with the coarse and the sordid. (Calvino 1968, vol. I, p. 7, our translation; see also Calvino 1980, p. XV) By his analogy
with Shakespeare, Calvino seizes the amazing linguistic
skill of Basile, which reaches one of its peaks in this
fairy tale's operation of the three little artist
animals. He moves to perfection his juggler tools,
mingling scatological, sexual, military languages, and
then he ends his amazing performance with some lines of
Francesco Petrarca. The amazing writer provokes laughter
and admiration, bringing on the stage the infinite
resources of the language. Tale of Tales is a Neapolitan work, and its language is today nearly incomprehensible even in Neaples, but its influence on the Italian and European fairy-tale imagination testifies to its universal value. As for the adjective hideous, we agree with Italo Calvino on condition that we think as hideous the human being too. From Basile's baroque point of view life usually mingles together the sublime and the coarse. Moreover, we can feel Basile close to us thanks to his irreducible complexity, which reflects our weakened identity, because no salvific ideology looks now able to ensure us. We can feel
ourselves exiled and delegitimized like Nardiello, when
we undergo the narcissistic injury coming from the
disillusion about our possibility to master ourselves. The
ego is not master in its own house, as Freud said. The dreamer writer Giambattista Basile did not get a throne like Nardiello, nor did his art make his life easy. However, he endowed his creature, The Tale of Tales, with the magic of art, and it has been travelling through time and space, beyond borders that he could not even dream. To acknowledge the magic of art means understanding that art is the offspring of human culture, and the only kind of immortality to which a human being can aspire. But it means also giving up the illusion to master one’s own creature, be it a little or great artistic work. (See also: Lake of Generation) In art alone, it still happens that a man, consumed by his wishes, produces something similar to the gratification of these wishes, and this playing, thanks to artistic illusion, calls forth effects as if it were something real. We rightly speak of the magic of art and compare the artist with a magician. But this comparison is perhaps more important than it claims to be. (Freud, 1912-13, p. 96) Thanks to this magic, the tales by Basile, and Nardiello, the princess, the king and the merchant, live happily forever after, together with the guitar-playing cockroach, the dancing mouse and the singing cricket. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Little John and the
Shudder Forest of the Exile Northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Italian writer Giovan Francesco Straparola wrote in the 16th century the first version of this type of tale ever published in the world. It is not included in Fabulando, but we are going to tell something about it, before speaking of Little John and the Shudder. In Ostia, an ancient city situated no great distance from Rome, there lived in former days, according to the common report, a young man of a nature rather weak and errant than stable and prudent, whose name was Flamminio Veraldo. He had heard it said over and over again that there was in all the world nothing more terrible and fright flu than Death, the dark and inevitable one, seeing that he shows pity to none, having respect to no man, however poor or rich he may be. Wherefore, being filled with wonder at what he had heard, he determined by himself to find and to see with his own eyes what manner of thing this might be which men called Death. (Straparola, W. G. Waters translator, p. 112; English version available online in the website of Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole) Flamminio leaves his home and after a long hard way he reaches a desert marble city where he meets a very ugly and old woman. He thinks to have finally found what he was looking for, but the woman reveals herself as Life. Nevertheless, having heard the youth's request, to try fear and know Death, she satisfies him. Old ugly Life cuts the head of Flamminio and reattaches it backwards on his neck. So Flamminio looks down and sees his shoulders, his loins, and his big buttocks standing out. He falls into such a fit of terror and dismay that, not being able to think of any place where he could hide himself, he cries out to the old woman in a trembling dolorous voice: Alas, alas, my good mother! bring me back once more to my old shape; bring me back, for the love of God, for by my faith I have never seen anything more frightful and more hideous than what I now behold (ibid.). Old ugly mother Life leaves Little John/Flamminio in this dreadful condition for some time, then she cuts his head off again and reattaches it in the right way. When Little John/Flamminio …perceived that he had once more become his old self, put on his clothes; and now, having seen what a terrible thing, and by his own experience proved what a hideous and ugly thing Death was, he made his way back to Ostia by the shortest and the quickest way he knew without saying any more farewell words to the old woman, occupying himself for the future in reaching after Life and flying from Death, devoting himself more diligently to the consideration of those matters which he had hither to neglected (ibid.). We know fear since we know the existence of death; and we stop looking for death like we did whan we did not know fear. Death is the only thing, together with birth, that we do not need to look for. This tale may be a masterful flash of light if we get a glimpse into the human reality that it enlightens. It explains our trend to run many risks when we go beyond limits without any goal. We may lose our life looking for death, but what we are really looking for is the experience of our limits. To see death makes us feel dread and may be the biggest push to look for better occupations. The ancient Italian fairy tale is a perfect introduction to Little John and the Shudder, which tells of a boy who did not know what fear was, but different from the version retold by Calvino (Dauntless Little John). It includes motifs that we see in Calvino’s version, for example the night that the main actant spends in a cursed castle, where all who had tried to do so had died. Here we present this tale, widespread all over Europe, as Wilhelm Grimm wrote it in 1818: Märchen von einem, der auszog, das Fürchten zu lernen (The Story of the Youth who went forth to learn what Fear Was). The main actant does not know what fear is, like Little John/Flamminio, and his father is not able to teach him this. He throws Little John out of his house, because the only aim of his son is to learn what fear is. Like Little John/Flamminio, he sets off following his desire, while the main actant of Calvino's version simply meanders without any desire. Since the main actant of the sixteenth-century Italian story - like the one of the story retold by Wilhelm Grimm - does not know fear, his condition seems to be the same as Calvino’s Dauntless Little John. But they are different from this fairy brother of theirs, because they desire - they know that they need - to know fear, while Calvino’s main actant has no desire. In the tale retold by Grimm, that Antonio Gramsci translated into Italian during his incarceration, Little John goes on complaining of his lack of fear. Even when he becomes the husband of the daughter of the king, he goes on longing for shudders, the goose bumps, namely the bodily test of that feeling. This physical reaction gives evidence of something unheimliche, unsettling, deep, unknown. It is the alive perception of the unconscious, be it represented by our shadow or by our backside. In the ancient Italian tale, it is a female character - a helper actant, so to say - the old ugly Life, who offers Little John/Flamminio what he was looking for. In Little John and the Shudder, the main actant also reaches his goal thanks to a female actant. It is told that the princess married by Little John was bored, listening to the continual complains of her husband, missing the experience of goose bumps. Her maid concluded the matter with a masterful hit that reminds ourselves of the cutting of the head acted by the old ugly Life, even if here there is no magic power. She went out to the stream which flowed through the garden, and had a whole bucketful of gudgeons brought to her. At night when the young king was sleeping, his wife was to draw the clothes off him and empty the bucketful of cold water with the gudgeons in it over him, so that the little fishes would sprawl about him. When this was done, he woke up and cried "Oh, what makes me shudder so?—-what makes me shudder so, dear wife? Ah! now I know what it is to shudder!" (Little John and the Shudder e-book, p. 83) Here is the happy ending of this tale, which comes, as in every fairy tale, when the main actants realize their desire. It is the desire that sets in motion them and their story. Let us underline another detail of Wilhelm Grimm's version. When the main actant is going to spend his first night in the cursed castle, he asks and gets from the king some tools: a fire, a lathe and a carpenter's workbench with a knife. Forging metals, working and transforming natural materials means making use of a human basic inheritance. Little John, asking and getting them, endowes himself of instruments to become homo faber, the human being who can give shape to his life. Becoming a member of human culture, he can use these instruments to limit and defeat the ghosts haunting the cursed castle. We leave our childish illusion understanding that we are not masters of ourselves. Something unknown always follows us, like our shadow, taking our same steps. Freud named our unknown side "the unconscious". The main actant of the popular version retold by Calvino, like his two fairy tale brothers, ignores it, ignoring for this reason fear and death. And he does not feel any lack of fear, while the main actants of Straparola's and Grimm's versions feel this lack, so much that they live to find it. In Calvino's version Little John dies of fear seeing his back side, in other similar versions it is the sight of his shadow to kill him. Fear fatally comes to him and tears up the frail texture of his identity. Calvino's choice to open his collection with his version of Little John, could place the Italian writer on the side of those educators who think that telling children who are afraid of darkness that there is no reason to be afraid, can eliminate their anxiety. Nonetheless, this fairy tale works in its own way, inviting children to acknowledge their fears instead of repressing it. Children would never spend a night by themselves in a cursed castle or let anybody cut their heads off, even if they pledge to them to reattach them without any damage. They may feel a little cowardly hearing that Little John did it, but they feel good and brave when Little John is scared to death, just looking at his shadow or backside. By different means all the fairy tales of Little John's type, from the 16th first version to Calvino's one, tell that fear and goose bumps are not only licit but also necessary to live and grow up. These fairy tale belongs to the injunction of the Forest of the Exile, because Little John sets off on his way when his father throws him out of the house and tells him never to say who his father is. It is in the northeast quadrant having a male main actant and a father ordering him to live by himself. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Tale of the Ogre Forest of the Exile Southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is the first story of Basile's Tale of Tales. It tells of a silly layabout youth, in some respects a fairy-tale brother of the main actant of the Umbrian fairy tale Thus Ended the Idiot, of Nardiello of The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket and of Madmatt. While each of these three actants is an only child, our actant, named Dumbtony, has six sisters, who, having no dowry, cannot get married. The family is very poor, and the mother hurls insults at her son, who never does anything but eat and act the fool. She finally gives him such a hard thrashing that he runs away from home. Thus the injunction is the Forest of the Exile, southeast quadrant. The Umbrian tale is also located in the southeast quadrant, but its injunction is the Fork of the Possible Task, since the mother of this story does not chase her son away, but she gives him a simple task and puts into his silly son’s mouth her words, to compensate for his dumbness. The Idiot never meets a fatherly helper, and knowing nothing better than repeating other’s words, he finally dies. Death finally comes also to Dauntless Little John, who did not consider any task awkward or frightening. Also the mother of Madmatt does not turn her son out of the house, but she does not try to compensate for his dumbness; the boy encounters a magic helper and an enemy king, but finally becomes the wise handsome husband of the crown princess. As for Nardiello, from the story The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket, he has a father but no mother. He encounters three fairies, and buys their little animal artists with the money received from his father, who, upon learning that Nardiello has spent all his money, beats him and turns him out of the house. Just like Madmatt, Nardiello first gets, then loses, and then gets back a princess, becoming heir to the throne. Dumbtony runs away from home and goes on running and running, until he finds himself facing an ogre and stops in his tracks. This ogre has little to do with the cannibalistic ogres of many popular fairy tales; he is rather a preternatural creature, a remote descendant of the fauns and satyrs who once upon a time dwelled in the wild lands. They nearly disappeared when the angels and devils came, strictly separating good and evil. The pagan creatures found shelter in superstitions and fairy tales. We can see another ogre of this kind in the fairy tale of Violet, an urbane gullible ogre, friend of fairies and fatherly and tender helper to the female main actant. In The Tale of the Ogre, Dumbtony faces this ogre, who is ready to welcome him like Violet's ogre. However, he is a wild ogre, and thus lives far from the city, and is grotesque in appearance. His head was larger than an Indian vegetable-marrow, his forehead full of bumps, his eyebrows united, his eyes crooked, his nose flat, with nostrils like a forge, his mouth like an oven, from which protruded two tusks like unto a boar’s; a hairy breast had he, and arms like reels; and bandy-legged was he, and flat-footed like a goose; briefly he was an hideous monster, frightful to behold, who would have frightened a Roland, horrified, a Scannarebecco, and turned pale an experienced wrestler ; but Dumbtony, who cared not for ugliness or aught else, nodding his head slightly to him, said, ‘Farewell sir, what are you doing here? How are you? Would you something? How far is it from here to the place whereto I am bound?’ the ogre, hearing such foolish queries addressed to him, burst out a-laughing, and because he was pleased with that humourous beast, said to him, ‘Are you looking for a master?’ and Dumbtony rejoined, ‘Which monthly pay would you?’ and the ogre answered, ‘Mind and serve me honourably, and we will not dispute about the wage.’ (The Tale of the Ogre e-book, pp. 13-15) Dumbtony's service to the ogre only consists in eating, and so he becomes very fat. But after two years he becomes homesick, and, losing weight day by day, he wastes away. Unable to work and provide for himself and his family, Dumbtony has found a master who feeds him, because he is only able to eat, just like a newborn child. Nevertheless, he is so homesick that he stops eating. The ogre sees that he iswasting away, and lets him go home with a magical gift. He gives him a donkey, ordering him not to say “Ass do goldpoo!” before arriving home. Dumbtony promises to obey him, but as soon as he is out of sight of his master he pronounces the magic words. In the blink of an eye, the donkey spews forth a lot of rubies, emeralds and diamonds, which Dumbtony puts into his knapsack. Unable to understand what to say out loud and what to keep to himself, as well as being unable to work and carry out any duty, Dumbtony is robbed by an innkeeper who replaces his magic donkey with a common one. Let us remember that the magic ass of this fairy tale is the same as in Perrault’s Peau d’âne, where the animal supplies the king’s treasure with its munificent evacuations. Dumbtony then arrives home promising his mother to enrich her forever, and the woman takes linen from her six daughters’ trousseau and spreads them on the floor to get the precious stones. However, the ass does not care for magic words and when Dumbtony tries to convince it with a stick, the poor donkey evacuates ruining the linen and making the whole house stink. To escape his mother’s blows, Dumbtony runs away and goes back to the grotto of the ogre, who scolds him. Nevertheless, the ogre takes him back. Once more, Dumbtony becomes very fat, and after one year, he becomes homesick and wastes away. This time the ogre gives him a napkin for his mother, ordering him not to say "Napkin, open!" or "Napkin, fold!" until he is at home. Like the first time, Dumbtony immediately tries the magical words, and discovers the amazing property of the napkin, which conferes delicious foods served on precious dishes. The cunning innkeeper robs him again, and for the second time Dumbtony promises his mother to enrich her, bringing only a common napkin. Angry and disappointed, the poor woman turns him out of the house ordering him to stay away forever. For the third time the motif repeats itself, with Dumbtony who serves his ogre master eating and fattening up for three years, then becoming homesick and wasting away. The ogre gives him his third gift, warning him that it is the last one, ‘Take this stick and keep it in remembrance of me, but be careful not to say, ‘‘Erect thyself, mace’’, or ‘‘Lie down, mace’’, for I want no part with thee’ (ibid., p. 45). For the third time Dumbtony soon tests these words and his behaviour with the innkeeper looks the same as the other times, but he reveals only the first part of the magic formula. Dumbtony somehow learnt that there are things to keep to himself, and this is decisive for his story, because the innkeeper, thinking he will get a third treasure, finds himself under a burst of heavy blows without any remedy. He must go to Dumbtony and beseech him to stop the frenzied mace. Here we are sure that our main actant has learnt the lesson, because he does not say the magic word before the innkeeper gives him back the magic ass and napkin. Then he goes home with the three magic gifts, gives his six sisters a rich dowry, so that they can get married, and enriches forever himself and his mother and lives happily forever after. The motif of these three magic objects is very popular in Italy and in Europe, but this grotesque ogre “hideous of favour but handsome of heart” (ibid., p. 33) comes straight from Basile, who holds together at the highest level the naturalness and the vividness of folktales and the art of writing. We could give in to the temptation to interpret these three magic objects connecting them to the libidinal stages described by Freud, which here follow each other with one only exception, the napkin, linked to the oral stage, in the fairy tale follows the donkey, linked to the anal stage, while the oral one is the first libidinal stage. In every tale where the three objects appear, the stick, or mace, or cudgel, is the final gift, which enables the actant to face and win over the innkeeper. Only with the mace, linked to the phallic stage, Dumbtony can keep what he received from his ogre master and get back the napkin and the donkey, and then he can fully provide for himself, his mother and his six sisters. Linking the fairy-tale happy ending to the genital stage, missing in The Tale of the Ogre, we can link the final wealth of Dumbtony to the latent stage, with his mother finally proud of her son, who she previously beat and turned out of the house. The stick of the son, finally initiated into life, takes over the mother’s stick, with mutual satisfaction. It could mean that a phallic mother turns into a welcoming mother, thanks to the growth of the son. This interpretation, convincing but fairly mechanical, might work for all fairy tales where there are these three magical objects. Nevertheless, whether we would relate it or not to the Freudian libidinal stages, this motif is for Basile the canvas on which he embroiders the relationship between Dumbtony and the ogre, who is “hideous of favour but handsome of heart” (cit.). He is an extraordinary educator, a father figure endowed with such patience, intuition and generosity that he is made into an inimitable model. The first fairy tale of the Tale of Tales tells of the unrealistic virtue of an educator, like the novella of Griselda, the hundreth and last of Decameron, tells of the unrealistic virtue of a wife (see, about this subject, also The Green Beaubird). We would like to see in the ogre's ethics something psychoanalytic: he knows and tolerates the repetition compulsion, welcomes whoever runs into him, he nourishes them and lets them go their way. Stretching the interpretation, we would like to say that the power of the three magic objects reminds us of the power of transfer, which enables experiences that were impossible up to that time. The ogre performs female and male functions; he is paternal in showing Dumbtony his simple-mindedness through its consequences and imposing limits on him. He behaves like a mother when he welcomes and feeds Dumbtony for years, waiting for pain and desire to call him to humanize himself. The ogre follows Dumbtony's own time, understands his needs and allows him to grow year by year as a subject, until he gets homesick. This feeling overcomes his wish to eat and laze around without limits. Regarding his ugliness, this is precisely why the ogre could resemble a psychoanalyst. Both the ogre and the psychoanalyst are far from the 'normal' people's common sense, and they do not look reassuring at all. A psychoanalyst becomes as ugly as the ogre, when he turns into a mirror where his/her patient sees something so ugly and dangerous, that he/she has tried not to see it. If the patient is not too afraid, if he/she does not run away, he/she can find something that had been inaccessible or seemed forever lost. The ogre gives Dumbtony the chance to regress to the oral stage - when he has to do nothing more than eating -, then to the anal stage - when Dumbtony should be able to keep the secret of the magic donkey. We know that for the child living the anal stage what it makes with its body is as precious as gold. But Dumbtony is not able to keep his treasure, and the innkeeper steals from him the magic donkey, as well as the magic napkin. He cannot discern words to be said from words not to be said. The ogre invites him to keep secret the magic formulas, and to say them only at the right time, but Dumbtony fails and comes back to the ogre. Only the third time, when he has the magic club, namely a phallic symbol, he reaches his goal, to be useful to himself and to his poor mother and sisters. This story tells of a post-weaning time, which can also be the time of a psychoanalytic journey. Let us finally remember the answer of Dumbtony - we quoted it above - when he replies to the ogre who asks him if he will serve him. Whilst it looks like a non-sense, it may be a full-sense. ‘Which monthly pay would you?’ and the ogre answered, ‘Mind and serve me honourably, and we will not dispute about the wage.’ (ibid., p. 15). A patient serves the psychoanalyst because, thanks to the transfert, he plays with him/her the dependent role he/she played as a child with his/her parents. But he/she pays a fee to the psychoanalyst who is and is not his/her mirror, who is and is not the avatar of his/her parents. And when the post-weaning - or Nacherziehung, post-education, as Freud sometimes named it - is fairly complete, the psychoanalytic journey is over. Then he/she can leave forever the psychoanalyst in his grotto built of pumice-stone. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooavola
Doll Marsh of the Dereliction Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Once upon a time, in Venice, Poavola meant doll. Its fairy tale was written and published for the first time in Venice by Giovan Francesco Straparola (16th century), and about a century after Giambattista Basile rewrote the same tale - The Goose - in his collection, in Napoli. In his tale Basile turned the Poavola from a doll to a goose, possibly because the Neapolitan writer did not know the meaning of Poavola. The Grimm Brothers, two centuries later, inserted this story in their collection, with a goose evacuating golden coins for her sweet foster mother. From Straparola to the Grimm Brothers the magic helper bites the ass of the king and hangs on to it. Why would a servant catch a goose to meet his king's need for some toilet paper? Moreover, could a living goose stay still in a rubbish heap? In fairy tales many odd things can happen, and a misunderstanding made the Poavola doll turn into a goose, but this did not decrease the strength of its tale. Children love it, also because it tells of solid goldcoins coming from the magic creature instead of excrements, and because the magic creature bites a royal back. Children are seriously interested in the anal sphere and coprolaliac expressions, for this reasons we named Pooavola, instead of Poavola, the doll of this version of the fairy tale - the first published in the world. Only scholars of 16th century Italian literature now read Straparola's fairy tales, and we are happy to invite you to enjoy his stories.
A shallow look does not see that magic in fairy tales follows a strict constraint, first because fairy tales must begin and end within a human horizon, as human as their main actants, even if they may have a star on their forehead or be forced into animal forms. The magic appears in a thousand and one shimmering ways. There are many motifs, which we inherited from ancient myths to retell them in contemporary literature and cinema. At the end however the main actant does not need a fairy or magician any more; the magic object is not in her/his hand any more, the witch is defeated, the ogre is far away, the curse that imprisoned the main actant is over and she/he will be free for ever after. The magic actants with their gifts or damages disappear, like the Poavola, to appear again in another tale, even if turned into a goose. They vanish, so wrote Straparola, just like dread or glee after a dream, like the shadows of the night that in the darkness scare children, they vanish because they are made of the same stuff of dreams. Their substance is finally revealed to be intimate with our own substance, but it does not confuse itself with everyday life, with the reality that we share with everybody. The injunction for this tale is the Marsh of the Dereliction, because the story begins with the need of the main actant and her sister that becomes desperate after the death of their mother that was their only parent. Having a female main actant, it is then in the southwest quadrant. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Lost Doll Marsh of the Dereliction Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What makes this tale so peculiar, is that the story of the maiden dressed up as a man, travelling around the world, is framed by another story, the tale of the parrot who acts to keep the main actant - a queen - faithful to her king. Here we have a tale within another tale, which comes to the oral Italian dialectal storytellers from a faraway oriental origin (other versions of this fairy tale were collected in Sicily, Tuscany, Sardinia and Calabria). We do not know which road this fairy tale covered, but we know an Indian collection called Śukasaptati, or Seventy tales of the Parrot existing since the 12th century. There is a tale encompassing others tales, a frame story: a parrot tells stories for seventy nights, to keep at home his master’s wife, so that she cannot be unfaithful to him. Some scholars think that Śukasaptati was known in Europe since the Middle Ages, other scholars think that it entered in the European tradition some centuries later. How could the Piedmontese folk storyteller in the 19th century know a fairy tale told in an unknown language? We do not know other subsequent variants of this parrot's story, the charm of which is intriguing. What is more interesting for us is that it gives evidence to one of the main magic virtues of the fairy-tale genre: to cross any boundary of time, space, language, and culture. They live and flourish thanks to the pen of cultivated writers as well as to the speech of illiterate people, giving us a various and abiding pleasure. The
parentage of our dialectal fairy tale with the Indian
collection concerns only the frame story, since the
tale told by the Piedmontese parrot has nothing to do
with the Eastern ancient collection. It tells of a
king’s daughter who is left quite alone, without her
beloved doll, and is left to wander the world. She
happens to cure many cursed princes before finding the
prince who is lovesick for her. Let us now notice something about this fairy tale, travelling together with the princess disguised as a man, who tests a feminine aptitude: to take care of others. Along her way, she treats ill princes cursed by underworld actants, mainly female ones. The princess can always find out the evil troubling them, watching all the night long over the bewitched prince, then going down a dark and deep place, which may be an underground prison or a cave opening under the prince’s bed. Therefore, this story tells that the princess herself needs to gain experience of the deep link between life and death, to understand how to care the others before, finding her lost doll - her own self. As soon as she discovers it, she meets her prince, and their happy wedding means the par excellence happy and fruitful alliance. We already said that the prince is already in love with her, since when he saw her image, her doll. She has no chance to meet him before achieving her journey, during which she tests herself in the powerful plot of illness and recovery, life and death. When the princess has experienced her power to care male illness, she finds herself. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madmatt Marsh of the Dereliction Northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Tunafish is a male helper - let us
remember also the phallic symbolism of the fish -, and
his aid comes from another world; through this
encounter, Madmatt can fill the lack of his father, who
has passed away. The confrontation with the king then
represents Madmatt facing the human law, which he
violated magically impregnating the little princess
Juliet.
This fairy tale starts with a prank that
repeats itself every day, when Madmatt, coming home in
the evening, screams at his mother to take all her
containers out to the front of the house so that he can
fill them up with his catch. But he never catches
anything. Then he makes funny faces, sticking out his
incredibly long tongue, triggering the laughter of the
little princess, who appears at the window of her
castle, angering Madmatt. Then, one day, Madmatt, who is ugly, clumsy,
and unable to fish anything, catches an enormous tuna,
and he sets off towards home, happy to bring with him
such a big fish. But the fish speaks, asking Madmatt to
release him and arguing that eating him he will not be
satisfied in the long run, but only once. Since Madmatt
does not free him, the Tunafish promises also to give
him a lot of fishes, and to make all his wishes come
true. Then Madmatt gives up his need of food and
puts the Tunafish back in the water, and following his
words he fills up his little boat with so much fish that
it nearly sinks. For the first time the poor lad tells
the truth, when he screams that he is bringing a
big catch, but his mother, for the very first time,
finally refuses take all her containers outside. But her
love for him quickly wins her good sense, and the poor
woman hurries up to prepare cans, pans, and dishes that
Madmatt finally fills up. Nevertheless, the little
princess goes on laughing, and Madmatt does not simply
rail against her as he used to do: he runs to the shore
and calls the Tunafish, who appears in the blink of an
eye, ready to fullfill his desire. Madmatt asks the fish
to make the princess pregnant with his offspring, and
this is said and done.
When the father king learns that his little
daughter is pregnant, he does not believe her innocence
and sentences her to death. However, the queen
intercedes on behalf of their daughter, persuading the
king to wait for the birth of the child. When the baby
is born, he is so beautiful that the king decides to
wait another year, hoping to find a way to find his
unknown father. Then he invites all the men of the city
for his grandson's birthday, hoping that the child will
naturally recognize his father. But the baby does not go
to anybody, until he tries to reach a door, behind which
is Madmatt, who is feeling too ashamed to enter the
hall. When he is ordered to come in, the baby smiles at
him and throws his arms around Madmatt's neck. The
dismayed king orders to put her daughter, Madmatt and
his grandson into a barrel, and throws them into the
sea, where they are supposed to quickly die. This is a recurring motif, which reminds us
of the Greek myth of Perseus, conceived by the princess
Danae with the supernatural love of Zeus. Danae's
father, the king, puts her in a casket together
with his grandson and throws them into the sea. The king
is trying to oppose his destiny: it has been prophecized
that his grandsn would kill him.
The King is dead, long live the King. The
flow of the generations following each other includes
ageing and death together with birth and growth. The
ancestor, the king, tries to dodge this law of life,
sentencing to death his descendant, but he inevitably
fails. Let us notice that in all myths and fairy tales
newborn babies who are abandoned like Perseus always
find somebody who rescues them, so that they can grow up
beautiful and strong. Moreover, they leave their
adoptive parents and return to their unknown parents.
There is no chance of dodging one’s destiny, like in our
Greek myth, because Perseus accidentally kills the king,
without knowing that he is his grandfather. Instead of the death of the parent who
abandoned them, fairy tales tell that the old king
abdicates to give the throne to his descendant, finally
recognizing her/him as his worthy successor, as happens
in the tale The Cockroach,
the Mouse and the Cricket.
Let us now go back to our fairy tale, which
was first written in Venice by Giovan
Francesco Straparola, then retold by Giambattista
Basile in his collection. The little princess, Madmatt
and their child are in the barrel with “a basketful of
bread, a flask of good Chianti and a crate of raisins
and figs” (e-book,
p. 37). While Madmatt eats and drinks as if nothing bad
could happen, the princess gets upset and is busy
calming down their baby, giving him some figs. When she
asks Madmatt how he can be so indifferent to her and
their baby’s suffering, which he caused, and to their
mortal danger. Madmatt answers that they are not in
danger at all, because he has a magic helper who will
make all his wishes come true. Then the princess asks
him to share his magic helper with her, and when the
Tunafish appears, the princess asks him to lead them to
safety on an islet and to change Madmatt into a
beautiful wise youth. Then she asks for a wonderful
palace, surrounded by an amazing garden with a tree of
golden apples.
Some years later, the king and the queen, the parents of our princess, were oppressed by melancholy after having lost their only daughter. So they decided to leave for a pilgrimage by ship, and when they saw that amazing palace, shortly after their departure, they went ashore to visit it. When their daughter, Madmatt and their child welcame them, they did not recognize them. Then, while the king and the queen were
admiring the wonderful garden, looking at the magic tree
with three golden apples hanging from its
branches, the princess played a trick on her father,
with the help of the Tunafish. A golden apple fell into
the clothes of the king, and the princess then asked all
the guests to prove that they did not steal the precious
fruit. When the golden apple fell from his clothes, the
dismayed king proclaimed his innocence. Princess Juliet
first pretended not to believe him, and then she said:
I
should believe you are innocent about the apple
which fell from
your bosom, but you didn't believe that your daughter was
innocent when her
child was born! Now it must be known: I'm
Juliet, unhappily
thrown into the high seas with Madmatt and the
child, all
of us condemned to a cruel death by you". With
tears in her eyes Juliet revealed all: "This is the
innocent child, born out of no fault of mine, and this
is Madmatt, who has become very wise thanks to the
power of a fish named Tunafish". (e-book,
p. 60)
Then the parent’s mirror breaks into pieces,
because the chain of the generations lasts thanks to
this discontinuity; it is a game of vital conflicts that
parent's minds can understand only if they acknowledge
and sustain this narcissistic injury. They can come to
terms with it only after a long and hard reflection.
In the tale of Madmatt, the king,
representing the law, cannot understand magic, just as
the king in the fairy tale The Cockroach,
the Mouse and the Cricket, because they
ignore or condemn whatever goes beyond their mastery. On
the contrary, Madmatt puts the Tunafish back into the
sea, giving up his first chance to satisfy his and his
mother’s hunger: he gives credit to the unrealistic
promise of the speaking sea creature. In a similar way,
the little princess, in a barrel shaken by the waves,
gives credit to Madmatt who is telling her that his
magic friend will easily lead them to safety. Then she
saves herself together with him and their child,
conceived with the magical help of the Tunafish. We find
other amazing magical pregnancies, e.g. due to a
sea-dragon heart, in the fairy tale The Enchanted Doe.
Nevertheless, is there not something magical in every
birth, in every child who resembles a man and a woman
coming from different families, and ancestors of which
every memory is lost? The art of storytelling, as well as every
other art, requires a work of symbolization, looking for
nourishment beyond realism: a fabulous nourishment: But what shall we
say to those who have such compassion on my hunger
that they counsel me provide myself bread? Certes, I
know not, save that, whenas I seek to imagine in
myself what would be their answer, an I should of
necessity beseech them thereof, to wit, of bread,
methinketh they would reply, "Go seek it among thy
fables." Indeed, aforetime poets have found more
thereof among their fables than many a rich man among
his treasures, and many, following after their fables,
have caused their age to flourish; whereas, on the
contrary, many, in seeking to have more bread than
they needed, have perished miserably. (Boccaccio,
Day the Fourth; p. 319)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Master
Cat or Puss in Boots Marsh of the Dereliction Northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Antoine Galland was a French scholar who knew Arabic and other ancient and modern languages. He returned to Paris after having spent many years in the Middle East. People in Paris was already very fond of Perrault’s fairy tales, and Galland, who knew the Arabian tales from The Thousand and One Nights, had a 14th century manuscript of that great collection sent to him from Syria. He translated it, and the first volume was published in 1704, when I happily lived at the court of Versailles and spent time in the salons of the of Versailles and spent time in the salons of the city. Other translated volumes of the collection were published with enormous success until 1715, when both Galland and the Sun King died. The Arabian collection, translated for the first time by Galland into an European language, was then published in many other languages and became Europe’s 17th century best-seller. Well, what has all this got to do with me? Among the first group of tales translated by Galland, I read of a challenge that was just like my story with the ogre! Wouldn’t you like to listen to this Arabian story? Kana jama kana… sorry, this is Arabic. When Galland was reading the Syrian manuscript, I was there, purring next to him… Once upon a time there lived a fisherman. He was poor and unlucky just like my little master, and he often didn’t even have enough to feed his children. He went on fishing and fishing, and at the end of one of his unlucky days he prayed and cast his net for the last time. All he got was an old brass vase, and hoping to sell it he started to clean it. When he removed the seal that covered the mouth of the vase, a column of smoke lifted out of its depth and climbed up and up. It reached the clouds, and took the shape of a huge demon, frightening the fisherman, just as the ogre had done with me. The demon said: - Choose the kind of death you prefer, because I am going to kill you. The poor fisherman fell on his knees, begging the demon for his life and for the life of his children, because he was the only one who could feed them. The demon laughed and said that he did not care for anything or anyone. The fisherman told him that it was not right or generous to give death to his deliverer. That unclean spirit replied that he didn’t care about being right, and least of all about being generous. - You have to know – he said – that I was generous during the first century of my imprisonment. I thought of making rich forever whoever would have freed me. But nobody came. Then I decided to show to my deliverer the secret treasures hidden underground, but nobody came. Then I vowed to be the faithful servant of my savior, to make him or her forever happy, but nobody came, and centuries passed. At last I became angry, and I decided to kill my deliverer. And here you are, prepare yourself to die. The poor fisherman felt that he was lost and soiled himself in fear; this hadn’t happened to him since his childhood! Then he thought that human beings are frail in front of a demon, but they were endowed by God with a mind that makes them greater than any other creature. He said, quivering: - Great demon, would you grant a last wish? The demon nodded. - I can’t believe that that you could fit in this vase, since I see you now so gigantic that your head brushes against the clouds. Please, almighty demon, show me if you really can reduce your size. The demon was certain of being invincible, and he changed into a column of smoke that became smaller and smaller as he entered in the vase. The fisherman did not waste a moment, and quickly resealed the brass vase. He was as quick as I was when I grabbed the mouse. Then it was the demon’s turn to beg the fisherman, not to be imprisoned for another thousand years. They found an agreement, and the fisherman became very rich and even a friend of the sultan. There is also a city turned to stone together with all its inhabitants, but there are no fishermen or cats in that part of the story. (From the e-book Puss Tells her History, pp. 3-41) (AG; edited with the assistance of DG) See also the e-kamishibai and the history of this fairy tale (Puss tells her History), which are available via its fairy tale map. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Puss
in Boots Marsh of the Dereliction Southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our Puss in Boots, whose story was first published by Straparola, was told also by Basile, but the ending of his version was very sad so sad for the Cat that she left her Neapolitan last writer. After that unhappy ending I left Naples and Lombardy and on and on and on I walked. About sixty years later I arrived exhausted in Paris. I was not in the mood to help anyone, least of all to hold a fine conversation, because Basile had made me sure of this: to do good to donkeys you get kicks in exchange. I also lost my passion for hunting, and I often starved, like so many poor French men and women, while their immensely rich king lived in the Château de Versailles like a fabulous sovereign, amid masked balls and unending escapades. Once I ended up in that realm and I saw miniature ships on the Grand Canal, with the Sun King and his courtiers playing naval combat. I suddenly stood aside when a coach arrived to the gates: the coach stopped before going in, and a lord dismounted and said: - Maître chat! Pardon: Madame chat! He really was talking to me, and invited me to get in his coach. I was uncomfortable, because I was in such a bad state, but I acted nonchalant - a cat can always look fair. Then I bowed slightly and accepted the invite. The man was Charles Perrault, the Architect of the Sun King and his favorite storyteller. He told me that his majesty loved fairy-tales, and that mine was one of his favorites. - I would be honored to have you as my guest, - he said, - and since my desire is that you quickly recover, I will order my cook to prepare whatever you wish. Then I’ll commission for you a pair of soft boots and a plumed hat, so that you can come with me to hunt in the Royal Reserve. Obviously, I accepted. It came again to my mind that fairy tales come true, as I remembered a saying that Basile wrote at the end of one of his stories: do a good deed and then forget it. It seemed to me that when one does something good the reward sooner or later comes: on that gorgeous coach I forgot the donkey’s kicks. My tale had moved faster than I had myself: Perrault, who had red Straparola and Basile, had written for me a beautiful tale that became the most popular one regarding me. Sure, I loved Straparola, the first one to write – or perhaps even the inventor of - my tale, and I loved the great Basile, even though if he gave my story an unhappy ending. But I adored the Sun King’s favorite story-teller, Perrault, who made me one of the most famous fairy tale characters ever. But why did Perrault call me Monsieur? Maybe I had lost all of my femininity by not taking care of my cleanliness anymore. I have to admit that when Perrault told me that in his version of my tale I was not a she-cat anymore, but had turned into a he-cat, I kept silent for a whole day. Eventually I came to terms with this change, remembering that the Greek prophet Tiresia, who was born male, changed into female for seven years and then became male again. I simply did the opposite, because in this tabtale I am a she-cat again, as I had been for Straparola and Basile. So you can also see how I would never take off my new boots, since they are so comfortable and elegant. Besides this significant change, Perrault made other innovations. Now I belonged to a father, as in Basile’s version, but he was not poor. Maybe the Sun King did not like to listen to stories of extreme poverty, even though many of his subjects were very poor. That father was a miller, and his two elder sons inherited their father’s mill and donkey. And - wouldn’t you have guessed? - the youngest brother inherited only me, a he-cat now, named Puss. This poor lad as well starved, and I decided to change his destiny. I asked him only for a pair of soft boots, to hunt better than ever. I really was a smart hunter, because I could go everywhere with my boots, and my conversation was gracious as if I were speaking with the Sun King. I used the same the ruses that you know of already, presenting my preys to the king in the name of my noble master and then arranging for the usual river meeting. Everything worked out for me and for my dear master, now named Marquis de Carabas. After this Perrault gifted me with an episode of my story that had never been written before, which I am proud of more than of my new boots and plumed hat. I think that this new part, that you all know, is even more significant than my new male sex. In those ancient times a male was held in higher regard than a female. Perrault made me perform the feat of challenging and defeating an ogre. In the 16th century version of my tale I got mansion and estates for my master thanks to an accident that happened to their true owner. In the 17th century version of my tale, instead, my master bought them with the rich dowry of the princess he married. In the Perrault's version, finally, we get to the happy ending not just thanks to luck, but thanks to my imagination and smarts. If I had not been able to defeat that stupid ogre, my ruses would have been useless. If the King had known that the Marquis of Carabas actually had neither a mansion nor even a hovel, he would have executed both the lad and me together with him. Now you might ask: why did Perrault make me perform that feat with that ogre, which fits me just as well as my boots, with the result that I still wear those boots and still challenge the ogre in every tale which tells about me? To answer this question I will tell you a tale belonging to The Thousand and One Nights, that Europeans were able read for the first time thanks to Antoine Galland, a contemporary of Charles Perrault. (From the e-book Puss Tells her History, pp. 35-49) (AG; edited with the assistance of DG) See also the movie, the e-kamishibai and the history of this fairy tale (Puss Tells her History), available also via its fairy tale map. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jack
and the Beanstalk Marsh of the Dereliction Southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fabulando offers this renowned tale in an anonymous version (The History of Jack and the Bean-Stalk, London 1807), which declares itself to be the reproduction of a never before published manuscript. Jack is unable to help his mother meet their needs, and the poor woman decides to sell her cow, which is her last property, so as not to starve. She sends Jack to the market, but the youth stops along the way when he meets a man who shows him some coloured seeds. Jack desires these seeds so much that he gives away his mother's cow in exchange for them. Jack follows his own desire, like the main actants of Pooavola Doll and The Cockroach, the Beatle and the Mouse, even though this looks quite foolish. His mother, whom Jack thought to make happy, becomes furious and throws away the coloured seeds. But the next morning Jack sees in their garden a beanstalk so high that its top rises beyond the clouds. Jack decides to climb the beanstalk to find his fortune, even though his mother tries to deter him. Jack has always lived with his mother, down on the earth. Now he goes up, towards the sky. His mother has never answered his questions about his unknown father, but now he reaches beyond the clouds to a world where an old fairy tells him the truth about his origins. His father was a very rich and generous man, who always thought of doing good for those in need. But an envious ogre, pretending to be poor, took advantage of him, robbed him, and killed him. The old fairy orders Jack to avenge his father, recovering all of his father's treasures. Now Jack has a task that links him to his lost father, and thanks to his cunning he starts carrying it out, despite being full of fear and wanting to be at home with his mother. Jack manages to be hosted by the wife of the ogre, and when the giant is sleeping he steals all of his treasures. First he takes the chicken that lays golden eggs, then two bags of gold and silver coins, and finally a harp which plays itself. While he is fleeing for the third time, the ogre wakes up and runs after him, and although he is slowed by having drunk too much wine, he is about to catch Jack. But the youth, as soon as he touches down on the ground, cuts the Beanstalk which falls down together with the ogre, who is killed. And so Jack frees his mother from any concern, and they can live in peace and prosperity ever after. The theme of greed and generosity crosses the tale of Jack, who learns of his paternal origin and retrieves what his father had lost. The ogre had cheated, murdered and robbed Jack’s generous father, but the ogre is now duped, robbed and killed by his son, who eventually takes possession of his paternal inheritance. But nothing would have happened if Jack had not desired and bought the coloured seeds, which are a common and magical food, like the chickpeas of the fairy tale of Little Chickpea. Jack gave all he had for those seeds, although this meant going to bed without supper, and the same thing happened to Adamantina in the fairy tale Pooavola Doll. Jack, who had been an idler and a slacker, has many fairy tale brothers, actants who do nothing and mooch off their poor mothers. They are unable to find their own way, which would mean growing up, until the time when, following their longing, they manage to obtain a gift, a magical object. Jack and the Beanstalk tells of the huge cannibal ogre defeated by the young main actant, thanks to his own agility and cunning. It is the ancient eternal motif of the small winning over the large. It happens to David with Goliath, to Ulysses with the Cyclops, and to the youths, who sooner or later defeat the old generation, surviving it. (AG, edited with the assistance of DG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See also the e-kamishibai of this fairy tale, which is available via its fairy tale map. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Humà,
the Lucky Bird Marsh of the Dereliction Northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The main actant of this fairy tale is a poor woodcutter, and his donor is the magic bird Humà. When the magic bird sees that derelict man sleeping under a tree, he lays a golden egg beside him. The poor man is unaware of the egg’s value, and gives it to a merchant who pays him a pittance. Since the greedy merchant promises him a rupee if the man will bring him the bird who has laid the egg, the woodcutter catches Humà. The Lucky Bird begs him to free him, promising him a priceless jewel if the woodcutter will bring him to his otherworldly family by burning one of the bird's feathers. The main actant is not willing to listen to his donor, as Madmatt does with the talking Tunafish, and he does not give up the prospect of an actual rupee. The woodcutter acts differently from Adamantina who goes to bed without dinner in order to get the Pooavola Doll, as well as from Jack, who gives a cow - his and his mother's last property - for the coloured seeds he desires. Seeing that the bird has died, the woodcutter burns one of his feathers, and suddenly finds himself in the birds' otherworld, where Humà's parents despair over the death of their son. A magic creature turns Humà back to life, and the Lucky Bird rebukes the woodcutter and sends him back to his poverty. In a European fairy tale the woodcutter unable to listen to a magic donor would end bitterly, condemned to hopeless poverty or to a harsher punishment. Instead, this Kashmir tale goes on to give the poor man another chance, and it gives us too the chance to see an interesting difference between European and Eastern tales regarding generosity and greed. Humà, the Lucky Bird was collected in Kashmir in 1888 by the Rev. J. Hinton Knowles, and we can recognise a theme that runs throughout the Arabian Nights, the collection that has its roots in the Indo-Iranian area. In the Arabian Nights there are many tales where we find a wise generous King - here named as Caliph Harun ar-Rashid – who is always fair and ready to rescue his subjects and lead the story to its happy ending. In this Kashmir tale the name of this incredibly generous ruler is King Hatam the Noble, and we meet him when the poor woodcutter goes to seek audience with him. The poor man goes to ask this King to help him because he is so poor that his daughters cannot marry, having no dowry at all. But in the meantime, the Noble Hatam had become as poor as the woodcutter. Having nothing else to help the woodcutter, he gives him his only daughter. She is beautiful, and the woodcutter will get what he needs by selling her at the slave market. But along the way they meet another young king who falls in love with the beautiful girl and marries her, giving lots of money to the woodcutter, who finally puts an end to his poverty. Thus ends the story of the woodcutter, as the main actant of this fairy tale, but the story of generosity goes on, as a new tale springs out of the previous story. One day the young king who married the princess - thinking her the woodcutter's daughter – carries out a generous action, and his wife says that his action is worthy of King Hatam the Noble. When the king asks her how she knows this king, she answers by telling him who she really is, and how her father gave her to the woodcutter. The young king summons the woodcutter, who tells the same story told by the princess, and also tells of his whole adventure with Humà the Lucky Bird. Astonished at first, the young king then summons King Hatam the Noble and asks him to reign in his stead, because he will do it better than himself, who is still inexperienced and too young. Hatam the Noble gets back a kingdom thanks to his royally generous son-in-law, and under such utopic rulers - non-existent in Europeans fairy tales - justice and happiness can triumph throughout the Kingdom. Not even the golden egg laid at the beginning of our story is forgotten. The greedy merchant is ordered to give it to Hatam the Noble, truly worthy of the magic gift of Humà, the Lucky Bird. This Kashmir fairy tale belongs to an ancient Oriental tradition, which The Arabian Nights inherited and retold in the heyday of Islamic culture: the first manuscripts of the great collection date back to the 14th century. They are still unpublished, except for the manuscript which was freely translated by Antoine Galland (By Muhsin Mahdi, New York 1990). We can date the birth of European fairy tales as a literary genre back to the 16th century, when Giovan Francesco Straparola inserted some fairy tales - never published before - among the novellas of The Facetious Nights, and we regard The Tale of Tales by Giambattista Basile as the first European fairy tale collection. Returning to the theme of greed and generosity, we observed above that in European fairy tales the actant unable to receive a magic gift does not attain a happy ending. Western fairy tale actants triumph or fall depending on their responsibility, because in this modern literary genre there is no perfect King to come and save them. We see European fairy tales as a lay collection of human encounters with destiny and unknown powers, a story-telling that cannot count on human rulers to understand human life. Fairy tales, like Thomas Mann’s spirit of storytelling, do not depend on any religious or secular power, and they give stories where human rationality does not remove what it cannot master. We follow the tradition that names their protagonists as actants, because their tale depends on their acts, not on their name, origin, or psychological features, which are always undefined. For these reasons they can be a form storytelling befitting of our time. They are today the main narrative structure of many novels (e.g. many Postcolonial Novels) and many TV series, followed episode by episode all over the world. (See also, about this issue, Il romanzo new global. Storie di intolleranza, fiabe di comunità, by S. Albertazzi and A. Gasparini, Pisa 2003; see also Malefincent & Co, by Claudia Chellini, 2015 and Nelle fiabe a passo di danza, by Claudia Chellini, 2016). (AG, edited with the assistance of DG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Golden Goose Marsh of the Dereliction Northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Grimm Brothers, who knew well Basile's Tale of Tales, tell about the story of three brothers who, one by one, went to cut wood in the forest. They encountered a little grey man, who asked them to share with him their omelette and their wine, because he was hungry and thirsty. The two elder brothers refused, saying, “What I give you I lose myself, so be off with you”. (The Golden Goose, e-book, p. 17) The youngest instead, named the Simpleton, welcomed the little old man to sit beside him and share his food. So he received a magic gift, while the elder brothers had had to run home after they wounded themselves with their axes. In fairy tales, where the main actants are poor and gullible youths and get a magical gift, like a doll or a goose with golden feces or eggs, the narrative unfolds around the generosity of the main actants and the greed of their antagonists. Reading the Russian story The Duck with Golden Eggs, we observe the naive Little Ivan, who benefits from magic, and the greedy swindling begger, who does not draw anything from it. Common sense easily understands this opposition as concerning good and evil characters, within a moralizing story telling of reward and punishing. This current moral standard misses a more precious meaning, which we are going to understand looking at the little grey man of The Golden Goose, the donor actant of this fairy tale. We begin mentioning the gospel about the Day of Judgment, when the Son of Man will separate the righteous from the unrighteous, awarding the first and punishing the seconds to eternity. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me. (Matthew 25, 35-36) The righteous, invited to His right side, ask when they did all this, and the King of Heavens answers, Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me. (Ibid. 25, 40) The unrighteous who must go to His left, punished because they never met Him, pose the same question and receive the same answer: when they did not take care of a little brother or sister of His, they rejected the Son of God Himself. The events of fairy tales happen in a far away space, a long time ago. About this time and space, it is told that others have told others, in a long chain of storytellers, until the present narrator. There is no direct witness for the fairy tale’s events, no authority for their truth, which is only a feeling, shared between teller and listener. Everything happens and has worth within the fairy-tale, between its opening and closing formulas. Gifts and punishments, risks and solutions, spells and incantations, pomp or nefarious magic, unfold within the story, which never refers to any external world. Reward and punishment are given to those who deserve them within the fairy tale, which is the only time and space for the Simpleton, the little grey man and the other actants. Let’s now go back to the fairy tale, where the little grey man tells the Simpleton to cut a tree and take what he will find among its roots for himself. The magic donor never postpones a gift to a time and space external to the narrative itself, this makes the main difference between the fairy-tale genre and the religious stories or parables. The inclination toward the other, to see in the other one's own need or pain, forms the Simpleton as well as any fairy tale main actant, from the moment in which they meet the other who asks them a question, or something to eat and to drink. The other always appears small and weak, and the actants who follow common sense do not stop to listen to him or her, because they do not look by no means able to give anything to anyone. The naïve actants give all the little they have without thinking of a reward, so accessing to the experience of the sacred. Here we hear an echo of the words of the Gospel. In fairy tales the magic power that allows the actant to reach a happy ending, often springs from something which looks insignificant, like the little brothers or sisters of whom God tells when he speaks to the righteous and to the unrighteous (see above). The ingenuity of the youngest brother is introduced as a gullibility, he is ridiculed, and called the Simpleton. His two older brothers, following common sense, adhere to the concrete measure of what they have, like their omelette and wine, and they reject the little grey man, saying, “What I give you I lose myself, so be off with you" (quoted above). For the Simpleton’s elder brothers it is a foolish thing to give away what belongs to them, sharing it with somebody in need. The hungry and thirsty little grey man looks unable to give something in exchange, like a beggar asking alms. Only a naïve actant, named the Simpleton, can be generous with him, and the little he gives to the grey man is not lost, because in the ethics of fairy tales one’s treasure comes from the act of sharing or giving one’s wealth to others. So, we can understand the Simpleton’s compassion, remembering its ethymological meaning, feeling and suffering together with the other (Latin cum – with - and patio – passion, feeling, and suffering). The naïve main actants who share or give the other their own food, represent the human disposition to see in the other their own passion, feeling, and suffering. It is an experience enriching the actants who give something up to another, on condition that they do not expect anything in return for whatever they generously give the other. This human disposition is always naïve. When the naïve main actants share their food, however little, they get the chance of a magic endowment, as we can read in the fairy tale of Flower and Flowerstem, just like we are doing in this story of the Simpleton. The little grey man rewards the youth who shared his own food with him, showing him a tree that he must break down, and among its roots he will find a gift for himself. The donor actant here gives no statement about what the Simpleton should do with the golden goose that he will find, and we see our Simpleton who simply takes the animal in his arms and goes to an inn. Here a girl tries to snatch one of the golden goose’s feathers, but she finds herself attached to the magic animal, and when her sister tries to pull her away from the goose, she attaches herself to her sister. This magic attachment is the same as that of the Pooavola Doll to the king’s bottom, told by Straparola, and the same retold by Basile about a goose and a royal bottom. The Grimm Brothers, retelling this tale, changed this magic power, removing the embarrassing scatological trend of both Italian fairy tales. The day after, the Simpleton gets on his way with the golden goose in his arms, no matter who is attached to his magic animal, and the two girls must walk and run behind him. Whoever tries to free the girls, attaches him or herself to them, and the same happens on and on along the road. The Simpleton goes hither and thither holding his golden goose without bothering the people who unwillingly follow him, until this procession is so funny that a melancholic princess laughs for the first time in her life as soon as she sees it. In many fairy tales it happens that a silly poor actant succeeds in healing a sad princess, while doctors and magicians had been unable to do it. Like Nardiello in the fairy tale The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket, the Simpleton wins the hand of the princess, but, like Nardiello, he faces the hostility of the father king, who tries to get rid of a son-in-law who does not look at all suitable for his daughter. Nardiello overcomes all obstacles thanks to his magic little animals, and the Simpleton overcomes the tasks imposed on him by the king, asking and getting the magic help of the little grey man. You find this fairy tale in the northeast quadrant, because there is a male main actant who sets off thanks to a paternal magic donor. Its injunction is the Marsh of the Dereliction, due to the poverty and dullness of the main male actant. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Youth and the Lamp Marsh of the Dereliction Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the beautiful collection of folk stories Novellistica italo-albanese (1967), one finds a richness of motifs and combinations largely unheard of. One wonders how it has been possible that a small people, separated from its original country, and surrounded by Italians for four centuries, were able to maintain and develop such a rich art of story telling. There are many cross-references, giving us original and different stories from other southern Italian traditions. The works to which we are regularly reminded are The Tale of Tales of Giambattista Basile and The Thousand Nights and One Night. The fairy tale we wanted to enclose in Fabulando tells of the folk variant of our beloved Alaaddin. (See also: Adalinda Gasparini, Aladino e la lampada meravigliosa,1993) The main character is here named just as the youth, the Sultan is here simply the king, and princess Badr al-Budur (Full Moon of Full Moons) is here named the king's daughter or the youth's bride. The lamp is never said to be magic, and no jinn comes out of this magic object. But it is no less powerful than its literary sister: it tells of the wonderful castle built in only one night for the young protagonist, and of the evil magician ordering the lamp to carry the castle in the middle of the sea. Like his analogous figure in the original version by Antoine Galland, the magician here obtains the wonderful lamp by exchanging new lamps for old ones. Alaaddin is one of the fairy tales told by the Maronite Hannà from Aleppo to Galland, as well as The Bird Bulbul Hezar, available here in Fabulando. The oral story teller did not tell why the magician had imprisoned Aladdin in his well, where the youth by chance finds the lamp, or why he wants to take the youth's golden palace, his bride and his mother. This lack is precious because it is evidence of the literary source of the story, as well as of the popular skill of taking motifs and characters from the cultured tradition. It is the democracy of fairy tales, their true magic. You find this Arbëreshë fairy tale in the southeast quadrant, because the young male actant sets off following the magician. Its injunction is the Marsh of the Dereliction because the tale begins with such a poverty, that the magician can cajole the young main actant into following him. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Goose Marsh of the Dereliction Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The first thing we ask ourselves reading this fairy tale by Basile, who retells Straparola's Pooavola Doll, is why the Neapolitan writer replaced the magic doll with a goose. Both Basile and Straparola tell of a magic being showering the bed of her poor but kind owner with golden coins, while she showers with foul-smelling excrements the sheet of the greedy and envious woman who stole the doll from her owner. The story can concern the equation between money, gold, and feces, which the child experiences during the anal stage. Parents usually experience the obstinacy with which their child imposes its management of the only product it can master by itself, and its true despair when a little enema forces it to capitulate. From this experience, parents could obtain the basic elements to understand the power games with which humans dominate and submit each other, if only they would carefully observe their children during this stage. Even if fairy tales do not stop at theboundaries of time and space which govern the measures and rhythms of our waking life, it is not easy to imagine that a goose may be suitable for the function already fulfilled by the rag doll. Nevertheless, if a doll and a goose can shower their dear mistress' white linen with gold, both can also stick - one with its teeth, the other with its beak - to the royal bottom, and keep it until their loving mistress doesn't convince them to leave alone the king and jump into her arms. We like to think that the Neapolitan Basile did not know the meaning of the Venetian poavola (bambola, doll), and that he associated the magic helper of Straparola’s fairy tale with an ancient gifter of golden eggs. The Greek Aesop and the Latin Phaedrus told this fable, which has since been retold many times as a moral exemplum. Two gold donors met, a Venetian rag doll giving golden coins instead of excrements, with an ancient - but evergreen - hen that laid golden eggs. Thanks to this encounter, an ancient hen or goose giving golden coins can fill with excrements the antagonist's bed and stick to a royal bottom with her beak, like the rag doll, the Venetian Poavola. From the cloacas of the hen and goose come excrements and eggs, which become golden eggs or coins in fairy tales. In the little childrens' fantasies the anal orifice overlaps with the genital one, giving room to the overlapping of precious products - babies, golden coins -, to be kept, and stinking products, to be eliminated. Listening to the children's fantasies about how babies are born is the easiest way to see this overlapping . Children enjoy this tale, almost as if they were engaged in the defence of their management of their anal product, which is so precious because it is the only one which depnds exclusively on them. They like the great value of the doll’s and goose’s evacuation, when they still cannot accept the grown-ups’ disgust and contempt for the only product of their own body. In many languages the vulgar term for feces is used to disparage a person, an object, a situation. The magic creature, be it a doll or a goose, realizes the fantasy of the child, who gives immense value to its feces, against its parents' contempt. Moreover, this fairy-tale donor, who is just a little doll or a barnyard bird that can be thrown into the trash, has such power that the king and all his servants and doctors cannot prevent it from remaining attached to the royal bottom. The Goose continues like Pooavola Doll, with the same humble and naïve main actant who frees the king from the torment that the animal is inflicting on him. The younger sister recognizes and greets her Goose. “O Chubby, my little Chubby!” The Goose, hearing the voice of the girl who beloved her, at once released her grip, running jumped in her arms, and caressed her and gave her lots of kisses. She did not care a fig about losing the bottom of a king, preferring the mouth of a country maid. (The Goose, e-book, p. 26; our translation) (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Duck with Golden Eggs Marsh of the Dereliction Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This Russian story was collected by an anonymous English folklorist at the end of the 19th century. It tells of a derelict youth who becomes the tsar in a manner paralleled in many stories of the Arabian Nights. When there is no heir left to the throne, the dignitaries and people of the kingdom go out of the town gates to give the crown to the first man they will see coming from the desert. It is an odd method, like the one adopted by the king of Frog, Frog to give a wife to his three sons. This king gave his sons three golden balls that the princes were supposed to let roll; they were then to choose their brides from wherever the balls stopped. In another Russian tale the main actant finds his way by throwing a ball of yarn and following it. Little Ivan, the main actant of this fairy tale, eats a roasted duck ignoring that it is the magic animal who laid golden eggs. His father banishes him, not knowing that his wife had killed the magic duck for an apprentice who knew that by eating it one would become the tsar. Leaving home as a young derelict, Little Ivan then becomes the tsar. Greedy, cheating and envious figures never get a happy ending, at least in fairy tales. If we read this fairy tale - together with those we collected in the Tour of the Derelict Youths - as an apologue on generosity and greed, telling only that the naive innocent youth is rewarded, while the envious greedy actant gets no gift or is punished, we stop merely at the surface of this story. We would thus risk losing its lively and dynamic value, which has nothing to do with any moralizing and edifying teachings. Fairy tales are narrative maps concerning the journey of the subject facing fate. The latter is, story after story, personified by objects, magic animals or human beings endowed with mysterious powers. Living means also facing the happy or tragic events that happen to us, regardless of our faults or merits. Events are refractory to any rational explanations, and their logic does not obey the principle of non-contradiction. They are like birds, and our indexes are cages that we build to grasp them. But events change size and shape like the dwellers of fairy tales, and when we think we have mastered them, they leave us and fly far away. If we then do not give up our cage, we work with dead simulacra of fairy tales. Concerning the naivete of those who benefit from the magic, we can observe that they are actants who do not measure what they encounter, be they objects, animals or humans, by the yardstick of common sense. Seemingly naïve, they come into play by suspending the rational criteria and common calculation that guide their antagonists - e.g. the roundsman preferred by the mother of Little Ivan. Their nature enables them to interact with favourable and unfavourable forces, which manifest themselves in every life. No common sense can really measure or order them. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cat
Cinderella - by the Authors of Fabulando Tower of the Segregation Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This version of Cinderella is the story that we retold and animated in the app Cat Cinderella, available for free on the App Store. We intertwined the stories of Zezolla, then called Gatta Cennerentola (Basile, 1634-36; Cat Cinderella. First Published Version, 17th century), of Cendrillon (Perrault, 1697), of Cinderella (Walt Disney, US 1950) and of a Florentine Cenerentola (Imbriani, 1877). Whatever our explicit desire, in reality we always change something when we retell a story, combining various details from different tales that we remember from our childhood. There are however some constant features in each version of Cinderella: a motherless girl who must submit to her stepmother and stepsisters, who then meets the prince thanks to the help of a fairy and escapes from him, the prince who eventually finds her thanks to the shoe she lost, and finally their happy marriage. These stories have variations that make each of them unique, and we retold our tale combining these variations, so as to compose an original new version of the world's most famous fairy tale. We also followed another beautiful version of Cinderella, told in pictures by Arthur Rackham; it is a masterpiece from which we drew and reworked the illustrations that we put on each page of this e–book. To know which features we drew from the different versions mentioned above, see, on the website Fairitaly, Una fairy tale tutta nuova e tutta antica. Lettura narratologica, by Claudia Chellini, part of the app Cat Cinderella). We would now point out
some features of our new tale, which with pleasure we
found in the film Cinderella, directed by
Kenneth Branagh and produced by Walt Disney Pictures
(US, 2015). Marian
Roalfe Cox, a member of the London
Folklore Society, published in 1893 a book which is
very important for anyone who wants to study the story
of Cinderella. She collected three hundred and forty
five versions of this tale, divided into five broad
types. One of these types includes Catskin and
Donkey Skin (see
also, for another short account of Donkey Skin,
the Castle
of Forced Love). In this type, the
main male actant, who is a determined prince, falls in
love with a girl who wraps herself up in a dirty
animal skin, after catching a glimpse of her beauty
while she is wearing her wonderful secret gowns. He
recruits the help of his royal parents to reveal her
for what she really is and happily marry her. In his film, Kennet
Branagh depicts a wilful prince, determined enough to
find his own way to inherit his father’s throne. He
loves and respects his father, but nevertheless he
faces up to him, reasserting his wish to marry the
girl he once met while hunting, instead of the
princess that he should marry for reasons of state. In addition, Branagh,
like Rackham, gives the
lizard-valets a particular space, making them into funny
characters that however hold an uncanny feature. As
men, they have a translucent greenish skin, yellow
green gloves that recall little paws and sharp animal
teeth. We see one of them catching a flying bug with
his long snappish tongue, just before midnight, when
Cinderella returns to the coach. See also the app-tale
(Cat Cinderella) and the e-kamishibai
of this fairy tale, which are available via its fairy
tale map. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cat
Cinderella - First Published Version, 17th
century Tower of the Segregation Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We know they are a symbol, an important
one; the perfect correspondence between shoe and foot
reminds of the ring-finger correspondence, in engagement
and in marriage, like in a perfect erotic intercourse.
The women’s love for shoes tells of their wish to grant
a privileged care to the lower side of their body. The
foot, with its mobility and the possibility to move
oneself that it gives, compensates for the lack of the
male organ being the bodily signifier of the phallus.
High and very high heels – the top stylists in 2015
only created very high-heeled Cinderella glass
slippers – stress the worth of the foot as a strong and
stiff appendix. Let us now remember the gesture by which a
male hand puts the glass slipper on Cinderella’s foot,
presented in every film following Disney’s 1950 movie.
The director presents a male character, the prince or
one of his servants, who kneels down to allow Cinderella
to perfectly fit her foot – representing a phallic
appendix – with its receptacle – a symbol of the female
genital. There is something so charming and precious in
the fact that a real slipper could reach the very real
price of two million dollars. The suitor acknowledges
the performance of the female main actant, who could
hold both the content and the container; moreover, he
chooses her precisely because she can act this out. The
prince thus legitimizes the female desire not to be
captured by the male, and to be able instead to escape
from his capture. Let us now look at 17th century
Neapolitan Cat Cinderella
(La Gatta Cennerentola), which is the prototype
of all the modern Cinderella variants. We see that the
main actant does something terrible, something which is
still present in some folk versions, but disappears from
Perrault onwards. The main
female actant's mother is dead, and her father, who is a
prince, loves his only daughter very much, but has
remarried a woman who does not please her step-sister.
The girl has a sewing teacher who is always kind and
affectionate with her, and suggests her how to get rid
of her stepmother. If the girl follows her instructions,
she can then persuade her father to marry her sewing
teacher, getting the ideal mother she longs for.
Following her teacher's advice, Cinderella drops a
chest’s cover on her stepmother’s neck, and after her
death, she persuades her father to marry the sewing
teacher, who promised to grant all her desires. Regarding the footwear, there is an
important difference between the most known version and
Basile's
one. In the time of the great writer of fairy tales, the
Neapolitan women wore lo chianiello,
a fashionable very high overshoe, which could increase a
woman's stature by
one handbreadth and a half. This is one of the
things that the enamoured king says when he speaks to
the chianiello
that slipped away from the foot of the unknown beauty. Thou
wert the covering for a white foot, and now art thou
the pulled of this blackened heart; by thee stood thy
fellow, one handbreadth and a half taller, who is the
tyrant of this life of mine ; and by thee groweth so
much sweetness in my soul, whilst I gaze upon thee and
possess thee ! (Cat
Cinderella, e-book, pp. 62-63)
Sixty years after the publication of the Tale of Tales,
Charles Perrault retold Basile’s
story, entitling it Cendrillon ou la petite pantoufle de verre.
Could Cinderella have gone to the gala ball, where the
crown prince – a king in Basile's
version - was going to choose his wife, with just
slippers on? Could the Fairy Godmother have dressed her
like a queen without changing her house shoes? Of course
not. These slippers are indeed made of verre, glass slippers
in English. Regarding the material, they hypothesized a
misspelling on Perrault's
side who would have given Cinderella pantoufles,
slippers made of vair, that in French sounds
like verre.
To go to the ball wearing pantoufles/slippers made of
vair, a very precious fur, could be sensible, but what
does it mean to wear glass ones? With regard to this
issue, prominent figures like Honoré de Balzac gave
their opinion, opting for the fur, even if this rational
argument leaves unsolved the pantoufles/slippers issue,
still unsuitable for a gala ball. "My
date-tree tall and golden,
To the tender puppet theatre of the fairy
tale, the genius of Basile
gives notes of humanity, which make his fairy tales the
masterwork of the European fairy-tale literary genre. In the Disney films, both the first
(1950) and the last (2015), there is only one ball
instead of Perrault's two. The French author tells of
how Cinderella forgets her fairy Godmother's advice,
risking to turn, in front of the prince, into a poor
ragged girl with an escort of mice and green lizards.
Her flight is so hasty that she loses one of her
slippers, and the prince who is following her picks it
up. In Basile’s
tale, Cinderella goes to the promenade three times, and
twice she escapes from the king’s servant who is
following her. The third time, when the king's servant
is about to reach her, her coach, following her order,
runs so fast that it nearly flies. At that moment she
loses the chianiello
that we already saw in the hands of the enamoured king.
Her lightness, her grace in dancing, and the rapid
flight of her coach structurally belong to Cinderella.
Also Aschenputtel,
the Grimm
Brothers’s Cinderella (1812), is as light an
acrobat. Ashenputtel is free from all ties about coming
home at midnight, and she goes to the gala ball for
three times, like in Basile’s
tale. When she goes home, the prince follows her to find
out whom she is, but she escapes him. The first time she
jumps into her house through the dovecote, the second
she nimbly climbs a pear-tree to hide. The third night
the prince, devising a plan to catch her, sprinkles the
palace staircase with tar, so that a little golden shoe
of Ashenputtel attaches itself to the tar. The great illustrator Arthur
Rackham drew a picture that we would call The Fugitive,
where a ragged Cinderella flees from the ball to her
house. She is about to put a bare foot on the ground
while the other is lifted up, still wearing a heeled
shoe (see the cover picture of Cat Cinderella - e-kamishibai).
We already know that the other shoe is in the hands of
the enamoured prince. How could Cinderella run so fast
and lightly, with just one heeled shoe? Moreover, why
did the elegant shoes, which appeared by magic, together
with the gown, not disappear at midnight? Let us now come back to the double paradox
of la pantoufle de verre,
the glass slipper. The dancing lightness and the fragility of
the glass, its transparency and its impossible
possibility, give the chance to establish a space where,
for the time of a fairy tale, of a film, of a dream, the
female desire triumphs together with the male one. Only
a prince can do this, being noble enough to understand
that his own desire is not the only one in the
world, instead of ignoring, fearing, or claiming
to master the female desire. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parsley Tower of Segregation Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parsley (whose name for Basile is Petrosinella, Rapunzel for the Grimm Brothers and for Walt Disney) has golden hair, so strong and long that an ogress can use them to ascend and descend through the only little window of her tower. This image could come out of its tale to live even by itself, probably because it recalls the eternal vain attempt of the old to possess the young. The golden long hair of Parsley might represent the strength of life that nobody can stop. This story starts with a pregnant woman, who cannot resist her craving for parsley. The superstition concerning the cravings of a pregnant woman has an ancient origin, and the damage that it would do to the future child belongs to the old belief that the unbridled imagination and craving of the pregnant woman would damage her baby. Since the parsley in this story belongs to an ogress, the future mother who secretly steals it, becomes indebted to this magical being. The injunction of the Tower of Segregation opens this tale with the pact between the woman and the ogress, who is a threatening maternal actant, who will kill the pregnant woman if she does not promise to give her her child. The ogress demands Parsley when the girl is seven years old, and she takes her away to imprison her in a tower without any door. The ogress raises this high tower, a phallic symbol, built by her magic power. She can reach the top of her tower thanks to the young vigour of Parsley, represented by her amazing golden hair. The old mother ogress and the young daughter Parsley form a couple, separated from the rest of the world. Nevertheless, fairy tales do not permit anybody to stop the flow of life, and when Parsley grows up, a prince comes to the tower and stares at her beauty, enchanted by the longest golden hair. Before only the ogress used Parsley's hair, to join her old age to her youth. Now, the prince uses them to climb up the tower and enter through the little window, and the two young actants plan their flight. Parsley had discovered from the ogress where to find a drug to send her jailer to sleep. Once the ogress is asleep, she steals the three magic acorns that will help her escape. The ogress chases her and the prince, but just as she is about to reach them, the young couple uses the magic acorns. Three huge animals appear one after the other; the first and the second one stop the ogress, the third magic animal devours her, and Parsley and the prince reache his kingdom, where they marry and live happily ever after. The motif of an ogress, or of another magic and threatening being who catches a girl, is not rare, and these fairy tales tell how the main female actant grows up beautiful and leaves her prison and her adoptive mother with a prince. Like the ogre in other tales (The Tale of the Ogre), these underground beings may reveal themselves as amazing educationalists (see also, by Giambattista Basile, the Eighth Tale of the First Day, La facce de crapa). The first maternal actant in this tale is Parsley's pregnant mother, who cannot stand her craving and gives her daughter to the ogress. The ogress is the second maternal actant, who imprisoning Parsley possesses her youth. The beautiful main female actant is here endowed with hair so long that it makes accessible the top of the tower where she is growing up. The same ogress unwillingly gives Parsley the means to win; the three acorns are the magical inheritance for her adopted daughter. The ogress dies, and this simply means that she disappears. She had come on the scene before the child's birth and she disappears when Parsley can live happily ever after with her prince. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sleeping
Beauty in the Wood
Sailing Ship of the Black Curse Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nevertheless,
we should remember that the three spinners in Greek
mythology were the three Moirai, Parcae or Fata for
Latins, Norns in Norse mythology. Clotho spun the thread
of life, Lachesis measured the thread and Atropos cut
it; not even Zeus, King of Olympus, could change their
decisions. We prefer to interpret this fatal encounter
of the female main actant as her encounter with the
mystery of birth and death that comes true for the girl
when she becomes a young woman. The princess is now
fifteen years old and she could give birth to a baby and
thus risk her life. She was fated since her birth, and a female
actant cursed her: this means that a bad tie between
her and her maternal figure may make her growth fatal.
In Basile’s version
there is no bad fairy, but a bad destiny, and this
does not make any difference, because the goddesses of
destiny were the three Parcae or Fata. Fata comes
from fatum,
destiny, and gives origin to the Italian fata, to the
old French fae,
faerie,
then to the English fairy. The
curse of a female parental actant and the risk of dying
for the female filial actant need a long time that
suspends the growth of Beauty. The tale may tell of a
century, which is a long defined time, or of an
indefinite long time (in Basile’s version), and this is
a time that life, or nature, or destiny, impose on
mothers and daughters. The little girl is eager to grow
up; she wants to take her mother’s throne, seize her
treasures, her adult charm, her place near the girl’s
father, and her power to give birth. When the
princess is fifteen years old she would be ready to do
this, she in fact is dying to do it. Her fatal
sleep averts the dangerous conflict with the maternal
actant, who would forever keep her power. Both the
version by Basile
and by Charles
Perrault, do not end with the awakening of the
princess. A maternal actant tries to kill her children
and her, burning her at the stake as was really the case
with women convicted of witchcraft or heresy. The
awakening and the union with the prince are not enough
to resolve this conflict between the maternal and the
filial actants. This tale tells of a hard conflict
between parental and filial female actants, of the
desire of the daughter to quickly get her mother’s place
against the desire of the mother that is in Perrault’s
version the queen mother of the prince. In Basile the
persecutor of Sleeping Beauty, named Talia, is the
queen herself, wife of the king who made Talia pregnant without
awakening her. In the most famous version, an old irate
fairy comes to Beauty’s baptism because the king forgot
to invite her. The king father then forbids spinning in
his realm, but a woman cannot avoid the encounter with
the mystery of life and death that she can only know
through her mother. Bettelheim interprets the spindle
and the distaff as phallic symbols, but they belong to
the feminine area. It would then be difficult to see a
phallic symbol in the fragment of flax that causes the
fatal sleep of Talia,
the same object that causes the apparent death of
Zellandine, in the more ancient Roman de Perceforest.
These objects tell of a feminine power, and of a
difficult succession. The Grimm
Brothers, followed by Walt Disney, conclude this
tale with the chaste encounter of Beauty with the
prince, losing the second part of the tale that proves
that the area of the tale is maternal. Walt Disney
inserted the kiss of the prince, while in the Grimm
Brothers' version the arrival of the prince was enough
to awake her. In the tale by Basile and in the ancient
novel Perceforest a kiss was not enough for the female
main actant, and neither were her consequent pregnancy
and labour. In these tales the main sleeping actant
gives birth to twins, a boy and a girl, and one of them
sucks her finger instead of her nipple and removes the
fragment of flax, so its mother awakens. If the prince or the
king had not arrived, Beauty’s sleep would have lasted
forever, and we can say that that encounter is a
necessary but insufficient condition towards the happy
ending. Her love for
her baby, and her baby’s love for her, may fully awake
her passion for life and her bodily pleasure, just as
well as a passionate erotic encounter. The woman opens
herself to the other losing the virginity of her soul,
even many years after having lost her physical
virginity, and her feminine desire awakes in her body
and in her mind. Then her prince must fight against his own mother to overcome his wife’s persecutor and save their children. In real life, these conflicts are as frequent as they are in fairy tales, even though they are usually softened by love and feelings of gratitude. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Misfortune Sailing Ship of the Black Curse southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
But then, just
when Sfurtuna is feeling the most dejected, she meets Gnà
Francisca (Lady Francesca), who
treats her not as a stranger, but as a guest, gives her
a plate of food. She then offers her a job, washing,
ironing and starching the garments of the king (Riuzzu)
together with her. Then they work together, and Gnà
Francisca brings the King his clothes each week,
and the King gives her money in return, with which the
woman buys ingredients to cook some cakes, as well as
typical feminine objects, like clothes, combs and beauty
creams to give to Sfurtuna's bad Fate. The story tells
how the maiden can take care of the male actant, thanks
to this maternal donor, and how this care provides her
with a wealth; this wealth, thanks to the action of the
same maternal figure, converts into a means that allows
Sfurtuna to get in touch with her harmful Fate and
change her into an ally. Only her Fate can give Sfurtuna
that which allows her to meet and finally marry the
king. Let us now
dwell on her Fate’s gift, which is a palm of ribbon (un
palmo di gallone), a little piece of fabric that
however weighs more than gold. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brier
Rose Sailing Ship of the Black Curse Southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brier Rose, told by the Grimm
Brothers in the first edition of the Household
Tales (1812), is today the best known version of
the fairy tale Sleeping
Beauty. The story has the injunction Sailing Ship of the Black Curse,
and it is located in the South-West
Quadrant, because it begins with the curse cast by
the old fairy, who is a maternal actant.
Before the Grimm Brothers wrote their Brier Rose, the fairy tale of the Sleeping Beauty had been already told by two great storytellers: Giambattista Basile, who in the 17th century established the fairy tales as a narrative genre, and Charles Perrault, who sixty years later made fairy tales the most popular narrative genre at the time of the Sun King. The story of Brier Rose is similar to that of Basile's Sun, Moon and Talia and Perrault's La belle au bois dormant: there is an opening curse, a sharp object (connected with the female art of spinning), which causes the maiden's fatal sleep, and a prince - or a king - who penetrates the protective vegetation surrounding the castle and reaches the sleeping beauty. The German story henceforth differs from the two previous fairy tales. Basile's Talia awakes more than nine months after the encounter with her lover. It is one of her two newborn twins who, looking for her nipple, finds her finger, and sucking it pulls out the splinter of flax which caused her fatal sleep. Perrault's Sleeping Beauty awakes because one hundred years are passed, and when she opens her eyes she sees the prince gazing at her. In both these ancient versions, the encounter with the male main actant does not put an end to the fairy tale. The threat of death coming from the opening curse returns in another shape which is even more dangerous. Therefore, we cannot yet be sure that the story will have a happy ending. Brier Rose is instead awakened by the male main actant: The prince was so amazed at her beauty that he bent over and kissed her. At that moment she awoke, and with her the king and the queen, and all the attendants, and the horses and the dogs, and the pigeons on the roof, and the flies on the walls. The fire stood up and flickered, and then finished cooking the food. The roast sizzled away. The cook boxed the kitchen boy's ears. And the maid finished plucking the chicken. Then the prince and Brier-Rose got married, and they lived long and happily until they died. (e-book, p. 41-45) Comparing Brier Rose with La belle au bois dormant we realize that the Grimm Brothers' Brier Rose comes from Perrault, as Calvino wrote in one of the rich notes in his Italian Folktales (Calvino, p. 1146; English translation ours). But it is moreover evident that the Grimm Brothers cut the second part of the fairy tale. The Grimm Brothers' Sleeping Beauty indeed interweaves with the story of a character which we find throughout Norse mythology: one of the warrior maiden or Valkyrie, whose name is Sigrdrífa - the German name is Brunhilde. In the Poetic Edda - a Norse collection of poems from the medieval Icelandic manuscript Codex Regius (13th century), it is told that Sigrdrífa/Brunhilde was severely punished by the god Óðinn (Odin, Wotan in German) because she had defended a warrior whom Odin disliked. ...[i]n revenge for which Odin pricked her with a sleepthorn, and declared that henceforth she should never have victory in battle, and should be given in marriage. «But I said to him, that I had bound myself by a vow not to espouse any man who could be made to fear.» (Sigrdrífumál - Poetic Edda, in Wikisource) So, Brunhilde here is not cursed by a mother figure (like the forgotten old fairy in Sleeping Beauty), but is punished by a father figure (Odin, powerful god who is also called Father of the Gods) who punishes a behavior breaking rules that he had imposed. The narrative of the myth procedes consistently from this beginning. Odin's punishment does not end with the fatal sleep: the Father of the Gods imposes marriage upon the virgin warriory, namely to give up her own freedom and submit to the patriarchal order. Her sleep in an inaccessible castle is like the task that the hero has to face to get her. . This is not at all a story like Brier Rose, in which, as we already said, the fatal sleep comes from a mother figure, and the only action of the father is to burn all the spinning wheels, uselessly trying to prevent the fulfillment of the curse. Brier Rose's fairy tale tells of a female question, the Norse myth tells something about an action violating the patriarchal order. The fairy tale starts with a maternal injunction, the myth from a paternal injunction. Going to Fabulando's Fairy Map of the Succession, we could say that the fairy tale is in the southwestern quadrant, while the myth would be in the northeastern quadrant. We know that myths and fairy tales are different genres, told in different historic moments meaning different questions. Nevertheless, we see fairytale motifs in some myths - namely the fatal sleep. As we noticed comparing Sweet Diamond Pie with the Florentine Re Porco, the motifs are polysemous, and their meaning emerges depending on the story that encloses them. The story of Brunhilde, virgin warrior punished by her father because she violated one of his orders, has a different progress from the one of Brier Rose. The fairy tale's main actant has to face the interweaving of life and death. This interweaving concerns the female mystery and the fairy tale represents it through the fairy's curse (to read more about the curse, see Sleeping Beauty in the Wood). We know that Grimm's Fairy Tales had many editions, the first in 1812 and the last in 1857. We know that one of the Grimm Brothers' writing their collection was rouse the patriotic German spirit. Germany had not yet been unified, and they wanted to give shape to the German Nation. But we know also that the two German scholars knew Straparola, Basile, and Perrault, and these three writers were for them important sources. What we do not know is how they found a similarity between Brunhilde and Brier Rose. From their notes we can see that they associated these two characters. Their Brier Rose comes from this association of theirs, and we think that the resulting version is poorer than Basile's and Perrault's. The Grimm Brothers cut the second part of the story, and the prince's figure coincides with the mythical hero (Sigurðr in the Norse version. Sigfried in the German version). In the myth we see a paternal injunction, and the fatal sleep is a feat that the male hero has to overcome. In the versions of Sleeping Beauty published before the Grimm Brothers' the curse comes to an end following motifs linked to motherhood. The main actant gives birth to a baby; in one case (Basile) the baby itself frees its mother, while the main male actant has the decisive role of helper and mediator, but he is not the liberator. At least in the first part of the story. Combining the two stories as if they were the same story, the Grimm Brothers radically change the role of the main male actant, giving him the power to untie a knot that belongs to the female sphere. The deep meaning of the encounter of the girl with fate, with the Norns or Parcae, is repressed by the Grimm Brothers, as well as the old fairy who was forgotten by the queen and the king when Brier Rose was born. What is repressed comes back: the old forgotten fairy, not invited, comes and curses the newborn princess. After the Grimms' version the power of the evil fairy grows more and more. In some contemporary tales she becomes even the main character of the story. The Disney remake of the animated film Sleeping Beauty (Geronimi-Larson-Reitherman-Clark, US, 1959) is a paradigmatic example of this trend: the title of the film is Maleficent (Stromberg, US, 2014); Maleficent is the name given by Disney to his forgotten fairy in 1959. Maleficent tells of the «most powerful fairy», the generous protector of the world of the magical creatures, who becomes deadly and destructive when she is betrayed. Her character dominates the whole story, because she is the main character and because of her total power. Nobody can defeat her: not Sleeping Beauty's father, Stefano, who uselessly tries twice to kill her, while the young prince kisses Aurora, the Sleeping Beauty, but she goes on sleeping. Only Maleficent can break the curse cast by herself, with a tender maternal kiss on Aurora's forehead. The film tells the metamorphosis of Maleficent from young good fairy to evil persecutor, alter the betrayal of Stefano, the man she loves. It tells also how Maleficent closely follows the growth of the princess whom she had cursed. The little girl rekindles Maleficent's love, and this makes the happy ending possible. This contemporary version belongs to the female sphere, like the versions told by Basile and Perrault. But there is an important difference: here the mother figure is omnipotent, much more than in the ancient fairy tales, and the male characters are quite powerless. In Brier Rose we can see how the Grimm Brothers repressed the mysterious female power which curses and frees the main female actant - Sun, Moon, and Talia, and Sleeping Beauty in the Wood - when she becomes a woman. In Maleficent this power comes back fearsome and destructive. The happy ending is possible thanks to a renewed female alliance between Maleficent - now good - and Aurora. The princess is crowned in Maleficent's magic world. It is an idyllic scene, with women, animals, magic creatures, and only one male character: the young prince whose kiss could not awake the Sleeping Beauty. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sun,
Moon and Talia Sailing Ship of the Black Curse Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sun, Moon,and Talia is the first version ever published of the famous fairy tale of Sleeping Beauty. Giambattista Basile wrote it in the Seventeenth century, among the stories of his collection The Tale of Tales. When the little Talia was born, her father summoned sages and astrologers to predict her future. They said that the girl would incur a great danger from a splinter of flax. The father tried to counter this bad fate by forbidding any flax, hemp, or any other material of that sort from his palace. But when she grew up, Talia saw an old woman spinning, and wishing to try the spindle, she called her up into the palace. Taking the distaff from her hand, she began to stretch the flax. Unfortunately, Talia ran a splinter of flax under her nail, and she fell dead upon the ground. (e-book, p. 11) Like all the fathers of the future Sleeping Beauties, Talia's father tries to fight against fate, and he fails like them all. In fairy tales, to escape fate means meeting it. We can read a fatal sleep very similar to Talia's one in the Roman de Perceforest (14th-15th century), a very long prose work which tells the history of England starting from a mythic landing of Alexander the Great on the island. Among the many stories told in this book, we find the story of Zellandine, who, one day, spinning together with her damsels, falls suddenly asleep, seemingly without any reason. An aunt of hers, after she wakes up, reveals to Zellandine that three goddesses attended her birth: Lucina, Venus, and Themis. The first is the protector of pregnant women, the second is the goddess of love and fertility, the third is the goddess of fate. After Zellandine's birth, the three goddesses were sitting at a table sumptuously decked for them, but Themis could not find her knife, which had simply fallen to the ground. Offended by this absence, the goddess of fate cursed the baby, instead of giving her a present:
Zellandine's aunt says also that Venus promised to use her power to make possible the awakening of Zellandine, thus lessening the terrible fate cast by Themis. The curse of the fate goddess is due to chance in the French novel. In Basile's version it becomes written in the stars. After Basile, Charles Perrault retells the story of the offended goddess: La Belle au bois dormant tells of a forgotten fairy who comes unbidden to the newborn princess' baptism, and sees that she does not have what the other fairies have: a magnificent cover with a case of massive gold, wherein were a spoon, knife, and fork, all of pure gold set with diamonds and rubies. (e-book, pp. 9-11) With regard to the meaning of the fairy in Perrault or of the fate written in the stars in Basile, see the note concerning the fairy tale Sleeping Beauty in the Woods. Let us here remember that the fatal sleep of the main actant is caused by female work with sharp tools, which recall the Parcae or Norns, the goddesses who spun the thread of human life, deciding its beginning, its character, its end. The fairy tale of Sleeping Beauty in the Woods tells something about the encounter with the deep dimension of female power, where life and death intertwine. Let us now resume the thread of Sun, Moon,and Italia. A hunter king passes next to the palace were lies Talia, the sleeping beauty, all alone. His falcon enters the building, and the king enters to look for his bird. He goes through many empty rooms until he sees, in the last one, the beautiful Italia. First he tries to awake her, then, fired with passion, takes her. Nine months later, Talia, always asleep, gives birth to two beautiful twins, Sun and Moon, attended by invisible fairies. One day one of the babies sucks Italia's finger instead of her nipple, and thus sucks away the splinter of flax and Talia opens her eyes. The first Sleeping Beauty published in the world awakes thanks to her experience of motherhood, which was possible thanks to the erotic encounter with the male character. But this is not enough to get a happy ending. The bad fate is still there, and Talia now risks to die. Like the Rajah who awakes Surya Bai, the king of Talia already has a wife. She discovers the betrayal of her husband. The main female character of the Indian fairy tale has no perception of danger, and Talia is equally naive. After the birth of Sun and Moon the king remembers the sleeping beauty and goes to see her. Finding her awake, He was overjoyed, and he told Talia who he was, and how he had seen her, and what had taken place. When she heard this, their friendship was knitted with tighter bonds, and he remained with her for a few days. (e-book, p. 19-21) Some days after the king leaves her and Talia does not blink. The story tells us that for Talia it is not strange that the king leaves her at will. Then, when a servant comes to her to take her children, saying that the king wants to have them in his palace, Talia gives him Sun and Moon without asking anything. But the servant was ordered by the queen, the first wife of the king, to go and take the children to kill and cook them. The cook saves them and replaces them with two lambs. Thinking to have given her husband his two cooked children, the queen sends her servant to drive Talia to the castle, saying that the King wishes to have her too in the palace together with their children. So the naive Talia falls into the clutches of the queen, who is going to cast her into a large fire lit in the courtyard of the palace. For the second time Talia faces a deadly female power: the splinter of flax had caused her a death-like sleep, and now the queen intends to burn her. In this female conflict, the male actants ensure that the happy ending is still possibile: first the king, who by getting Talia pregnant creates the chance for the baby to suck out the flax's splinter, and then the cook, who saves the children's life. At the end, Talia finally does something: she gains some time, giving the king the chance to arrive in time, just when the bad queen is about to throw Talia into the fire. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surya
Bai Tower of the Segregation Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A mother, a poor milkwoman, is coming home from the market with her milk cans. She is carrying her only one year old baby-girl. She is so tired that she falls asleep on the roadside. A pair of eagles kidnap the baby and bring her to their nest built on a very high tree, which has seven iron gates. The eagles call the baby Surya Bai (her name means Lady Sun), and nurture her lovingly giving her princely clothes and jewels. She never comes down from the tree, and does not know anything of the world outside of her nest. At the beginning, this Indian fairy tale is similar to Parsley, the story of a pregnant woman who craves for some of the ogress’ parsley and steals it. The ogress spares her life in exchange for the as of yet unborn child, who is the brought to a very high tower which has only a small window. Like Parsley, female main actant of a fairy tale written by Giambattista Basile, Surya Bai grows up segregated because of her mother's breakdown, and her fairy tale, like the one of Parsley, belongs to the injunction Tower of Segregation. This is the only injunction of Fabulando that is only in the Southwest Quadrant, where the fairy tales have female actants and maternal injunctions. Nonetheless, the Indian fairy tale’s narrative introduces elements different from those told by Basile, which are the same that we find in many other versions collected in the following centuries. Let’s remember just one of them, Rapunzel by the Grimm Brothers, well-known today thanks to the Disney film Tangled (Nathan Greno and Byron Howard, US 2010). Surya Bai comes out of the eagle’s nest by herself, because she needs food. The eagles are off to find a princely ring for her pinkie, leaving Surya Bai alone with two pets, a she-dog and a she-cat. The cat after some days steals food from the pantry. Surya Bai then punishes the cat, who, in revenge,runs to the hearth and extinguishes the fire. Having no more dishes or fire to prepare them with, Surya Bai cannot eat and decides to go and look for some fire. So the girl comes out from her prison-nest without any help, having known nobody but parental characters. Down the tree she bumps into another parental actant. In an ascendant progression, after a mother who had been unable to protect her, after the eagles, who kidnapped and adopted her, the girl meets an old Rakshas, a terrible demon who wants to eat her. As soon as she sees Surya Bai, the old Rakshas asks her, in exchange for the fire, to do some house works for her, because she is waiting for her son. This is also a Rakshas, who can kill Surya Bai, so his mother keeps her from going. The girl does not realize where she ended up, and she performs all those tasks, but eventually she requires the firebrand that the old woman promised her. By this time the Rakshas cannot deny it to the girl, even if her son has not yet come home. But she gives Surya Bai some grains of wheat suggesting her to drop the grains along the way back, to form a path between their houses. Without fearing anything, the girl does what the old Rakshas asked her, and goes back to close herself in her nest on the tree. Since she knows nothing but her segregation, Surya Bai can only come back to the very high tree, without even thinking of escaping. She is then quite different from Parsley, who, meeting and falling in love with a prince, desires to escape from the tower. In the meantime the son of the old Rakshas comes home, learns what has happened and runs the down marked by the wheat grains to go and kill Surya Bai. He arrives to the eagle’s nest, but he cannot open the iron gates. He smites the outside gate so hard that he breaks one of his poisonous nails. But Surya Bai does not hear him, because she is sleeping beyond the seven gates. Listening to this fairy tale, you heave now a sigh of relief. The girl is safe and the demon cannot reach her, so that in the end he gives up and goes home. But, as we said, Surya Bai is unaware of the dangers she is running, and in the morning she goes to open the nest’s seven doors without a worry. The fragment of the Rakshas’ poisonous nail $which had got stuck to the gate pierces her hand, and immediately Surya Bai falls down dead. Her eagle parents could not keep her safe, and neither could the seven iron gates surrounding their nest. Nonetheless, this is not the ending of our tale, or of Surya Bai’s journey. A short time later, in fact, a Rajah who is going on a hunt makes a stop under the highest tree. Being intrigued by the eagle’s nest, he sends his attendants to see what it is. Learning that there is a beautiful girl inside, he orders that they bring her down. He is captivated by the beauty of the girl and touches her hand, and feels something stuck in her palm. He extracts the demon’s nail fragment and awakes Surya Bai. This awakening is similar to the one of Snow White, of The Chrystal Casket and of the many other versions spread around the world (as for Italian fairy tales, see Nel bosco con Biancaneve, in Percorsi di pensiero, website of Claudia Chellini. For other versions, see the website SurLaLune). In all these stories the girl awakes from the fatal sleep thanks to her prince’s mother. The mother queen undoes the spell depending on the magic object that made the female main actant fall down dead when she touched it. In this Indian fairy tale, nonetheless, it is not a maternal actant who brings her back to life, but the Rajah. This kind of awakening is the same as in the Grimm Brothers’ Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, where one of the prince’s servants is tired of carrying the crystal casket with the sleeping beauty whenever the prince leaves his palace. One time, the servant pulls up Snow White and hits her in the back, so that the poisoning piece of apple comes out of her throat and Snow White awakes. Let’s say that the gesture told by the Grimm brothers has nothing to do with the gentleness of the Rajah’s one, but in both these stories, a main actant is able to bring back to life a girl who died because of a persecutory maternal actant. The Indian fairy tale, however, tells us that the Rajah’s gesture is not enough to resolve the matter. We see that Surya Bai agrees to marry the Rajah, but he has a first wife – the first Ranee - who is fiercely jealous of her. Surya Bai, despite what already happened to her, has not learned to recognize danger. She does not listen to the old housekeeper who warns her. [S]he used to say to her – “Don’t be too intimate with the first Ranee, dear lady, for she wishes you no good, and she has power to do you harm. Some day she may poison or otherwise injure you.” But Surya Bai would answer her, “Nonsense! What is there to be alarmed about? Why cannot we both live happily together like two sisters?” (e-book, p. 43) She then falls prey to the first Ranee, who one day pushes her into the fountain of the palace courtyard, and drowns her. The Rajah does not know anything of this, because this close combat is quite a female one, representing a mother/daughter conflict. The first Ranee is a maternal actant because she is the woman present in the Rajah’s life and house before Surya’s arrival. Let’s remember that this story is entitled The Little Surya Bai. She is the little girl in the family, so to speak. Let’s now suspend the narrative, to pick up again the thread of our reflection. We have said that the first part of the Indian story goes on like Parsley’s one, taking a different direction until Surya Bai does not meet any male actants, namely a prince, who is instead decisive for Parsley. What does it mean? Is it a mere matter of luck? Let us think of the Indian fairy tale. The girl can go out of her prison, but what she sees outside is not interesting for her, and it is dangerous. Surya Bai is contained within a childlike condition, where the only love and good comes from the parental relationship, represented by the nest to which she returns. On the contrary, when Parsley meets the prince, the time of that guarded relationship is over, and her falling in love stages something quite different from the previous time. What is out of the tower looks so desirable to Parsley that she is now able to steal the ogress’ magic objects and flee. We see that the ogress retaliates by chasing Parsley and the prince, but we now also know that Parsley's tale is going to reach a happy ending. This childlike time is not over for Surya Bai. This explains why the girl at first goes back to her protecting nest. Nevertheless, this protection is ending, and Surya Bai succumbs to the son of the old Rakshas. Consequently, we can understand why her awakening worked by the Rajah is not yet the solution for her. Surya Bai is not ready for the outside world, and she finds only another fatal place, not less dangerous than the house of the cannibalistic Rakshas. So, she dies after drowning. Then, like the beautiful bride in The Three Citrons, Surya Bai comes back to life several times. A sunflower springs exactly where she drowned. The Rajah, desperate for the loss of his beloved, sees the sunflower and is captivated by it, because it reminds him of Surya Bai. As soon as the first Ranee learns this, she cuts down the sunflower, burns it, and has its ashes thrown out in the jungle. But from the sunflower’s ashes, [T]here sprang up a young mango tree, tall and straight, that grew so quickly, and became such a beautiful tree, that it was the wonder of all the country round. At last, on its topmost bough, came one fair blossom; and the blossom fell, and the little mango grew rosier and rosier, and larger and larger, till so wonderful was it, both for size and shape, that people flocked from far and near only to look at it. But none ventured to gather it, for it was to be kept for the Rajah himself. (e-book, pp. 54-56) One day the poor milkwoman, Surya Bai’s mother, is coming back from the market, and being very tired she stops under the mango-tree and falls asleep. A beautiful mango fruit falls into one of her milk-cans. When the milkwoman sees it, she thinks of bringing it home in secret, not to be accused to have stolen it. Once at home, she hides it behind the other cans, then tells what happened to her husband and her seven sons, asking them to go and take it, so they can eat the wonderful mango all together. But they cannot find the mango. Instead of it, in the can they find: [A] little tiny wee lady, richly dressed in red and gold, and no bigger than a mango! On her head shone a bright jewel like a little sun. (e-book, p. 62) The milkwoman decides to keep her like a daughter, and the tiny woman grows up quickly, soon becoming adult-seized. She is always lovely and kind, but silent and sad. The milkwoman does not ask anything to Surya Bai, and she does not tell her story to anybody. After her rebirth from her mother’s milk-can, she finds a donor mother, who is the mother she had lost. Now Surya Bai perceives danger and learns to protect herself. One day the Rajah comes riding by the milkwoman's house, and sees Surya Bai who is drawing water from the well. The girl gets scared and runs away to shut herself at home. The Rajah chases her, but when he arrives at the door there is the milkwoman who tells him that she will not give Surya Bai to the Rajah who is demanding her as his wife [A]nd I won’t give up my little daughter for any bidding of yours. Be off with you, or I’ll pull out your beard.” And so saying she seized a long stick and attacked the Rajah, calling out loudly for assistance to her husband and sons, who came running to her aid. (e-book, p. 68) The Rajah returns to his palace and goes to see the housekeeper of Surya Bai to learn something more. She is in prison, because the first Ranee had accused her of the loss of Surya Bai. After the housekeeper tells him the whole story word by word, the Rajah asks her to become a friend of the milkwoman, to understand how the matter stands. We now see the housekeeper, who is a maternal donor, able to act freely. She forms an alliance with Surya Bai’s mother, who is the other maternal donor in this fairy tale. Now we know that Surya Bai is going to find her love again and eventually live happily ever after with the Rajah. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pig
King Sailing Ship of the Black Curse Southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beauty and the Beast belongs to the same type of story as Pig King, which tells how Beauty can become generative only when it joins with its opposite, which in this type of fairy tale is represented by a hideous or animal actant. The ancient Greeks teach us the importance of this union, since they tell that the husband of the beautiful goddess of love, Aphrodite, was Hephaistos, the crippled smith God. The story of Pig King tells of a sterile queen, whom is made more beautiful than ever by three fairies, who also make her inviolable and pregnant. But they eventually say that she would give birth to a baby pig. The pig prince is the opposite of his mother’s perfection, being an animal fond of mud and dirth. His curse comes through his mother, and he will have to marry three girls, until he will find a wife able to accept his pig nature and turn him into a handsome prince. Some teachers of primary schools told this tale to their pupils during a workshop that I planned and lead (see Adalinda Gasparini, Re porco e i bambini narratori, 1997, and L’orologio e la gemma, ovvero la cotica clamorosa 1999). Let's understand the meaning of Pig King through some words and pictures of those pupils, who heard this fairy tale from their teachers (the teachers chose to read it in my Italian translation from the 16th century version given in Fabulando. See Gasparini, Le prime fiabe del mondo, 1996) Then the pupils retold it freely by themselves through their writings or drawings. Those children were nine-ten years old, and nobody corrected their mistakes. The Italian text reproduces them, but those mistakes are impossible to transIate in English. I hope that the English reader can however enjoy these naive and yet piercing children's words.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Snow
White and the Seven Dwarfs Gibbet of the Death Sentence Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The most fluid vital side in every
relationship does not have only one colour, or
harmonious matching colours. It is a disorderly palette
where the painter, the subject, can draw on every
colour, every nuance, to make a masterpiece. But the
painter may mix them badly and get only a blackish
mixture, a confused heap, a confusa congeries,
to use the words of the Latin Apuleius. Fashionable
pedagogical strategies idealized childhood as the age of
innocence, and piously expurgated ancient and folk fairy
tales to veil the deep violence that their surface hid.
A little girl may live her perception of a maternal
threat in total loneliness, and she may only try to
appease it through phobias or obsessive compulsive
rituals. In the 50's and 60's Italian girls often had on
their night table a little Virgin Mary full of water
from Lourdes. These plastic statuettes were
phosphorescent and Italian women often remember a pavor
nocturnus (fear of the dark) induced by this Holy
Mother. No girl could tell anybody about this kind of
fear, because she could not say to her mother that she
was afraid of her. She could not tell this even to
herself, because the mortal danger of this conflict
depends on the destructive unconscious drive of the
daughter, as well as on the feeling of a destructive
side in her mother. Once upon a time, far off enough to exclude
any direct witness, a beautiful queen desired a daughter
as white as snow, with lips as red as her blood and hair
as black as ebony. Her desire was granted, but when her
daughter grew up the mother-queen could not accept that
Snow White - she had given this name to her daughter -
surpassed her in beauty. A magic mirror leads the mother or
stepmother of Snow White, and it refers to narcissism.
The narcissist subjects consists thanks to their
isolation, which stiffens their being into a shape that
can be holds together only if nobody touches them. This tale does not give any pedagogic
direction, unless you want to impoverish its meaning,
simplifying it. Any attempt to stop the time by blocking
the succession, fails, this is a natural law, while it
is a moral responsibility to agree to it, in fairy tales
as well as in everyday life. If we want to draw a moral
of the story, we can simply see its essential
simplicity, saying that the old generation fades, while
the new one ascends to the throne at the right time,
without any parent being able to forbid it. In the first version of the tale that we
chose for Fabulando the mother queen is not a
stereotyped evil character, like the Evil Queen in the
film by Walt Disney, who simplified the Grimm
Brothers' second version. Whenever her magic
mirror says that she is not the fairest woman in the
world any more, because her daughter is more beautiful
than her, the mother queen is scared. Unable to accept
the fading away of her beauty - and of her life -, she
must kill her daughter.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Crystal Casket Gibbet of the Death Sentence Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Among the fairy tales beginning with the injunction Gibbet of the Death Sentence, we see The Crystal Casket, which is a popular variant of Snow White. In facts, it tells the story of Ermellina, a maiden oppressed by her stepmother, who continually puts her in danger of death. The injunction is maternal and we have here a female main actant, and so this story is in the southwest quadrant. One day an eagle comes to Ermellina and takes her away, bringing her to the house of three fairies who welcome her. They take care of her, and warn her not to open to anybody when they are not at home. In some ways, this story resembles Snow White by the Grimm Brothers. Nonetheless, the encounter with the prince, that in this story is a king, does not close this fairy tale. In this tale, as in many popular versions told in Italian dialects and in other European languages, the king sees the maiden and falls in love with her. He brings her to his castle, while she is still lying in her crystal casket, and she does not awaken. The king keeps her in his bedroom, never moving away from her (see also Nel bosco con Biancaneve, website Claudia Chellini, Percorsi di pensiero). When he has to go to war, he entrusts her to his mother, imposing on her, on pain of death, to take care of his wife - whom he names Ermellina. But the mother-queen forgets this task, until she receives a letter from her son, who has won the war and is coming home. She orders her chambermaids to dust and clean the girl lying in the casket; but while they are changing her gown, one of the maids removes the belt that had caused Ermellina to drop dead to the ground. They did so, and the chambermaids went to the room and began to unbutton the dress. The moment that they took off the first sleeve, Ermellina opened her eyes. The poor chambermaids sprang up in terror, but one of the most courageous said: "I am a woman, and so is this one; she will not eat me." To cut the matter short, she took off the dress, and when it was removed Ermellina began to get out of the casket to walk about and see where she was. The chambermaids fell on their knees before her and begged her to tell them who she was. She, poor girl, told them the whole story. (The Crystal Casket e-book, pp. 65-67) Then our main female actant comes to life again and she finally happily marries her king. The Crystal Casket has a vividness and a freshness that largely depend on the liveliness brilliance of the dialect of Siena and on the ability of its popular storyteller, an illiterate woman. But they depend also on Giuseppe Pitrè, who collected this story in 1875 from its oral storyteller. Pitrè is one of the greatest Italian scholars of folk traditions, who lived between the second part of the 19th century and the First World War. He collected and annotated countless expressions of Sicilian and Italian popular cultures, and among his many works we would like to mention at least the «Archivio per lo studio delle tradizioni popolari» (1882-1906), that he founded and directed together with Salvatore Salomone-Marino. They published in this journal every kind of folk expression coming from different Italian and European regions: fairy tales, myths and legends, traditions and superstitions, habits and customs, sayings, songs and poems, plays, pastimes and riddles. Italian and European scholars made their contribution to the journal, which soon became a European point of reference for international scholars of folklore. Passion and philological rigour supported Pitrè’s work, whose worth clearly stands out, especially when we notice that he made it just after the unification of Italy. The theme of national identity was the focus both of cultural debate and of policy makers. To collect and publish the traces of the traditions belonging to a certain region led them out of their geographic borders, to compare them with habits, fairy tales, legends, and songs coming from other regions. It was a way to establish a link between local and national history through a relationship that would enrich each one. The work of Pitrè and his contemporary Italian scholars of folk traditions gave shape to a movement of knowledge and mutual acknowledgement among Italians living in different and far apart geographical areas. Their effort tried to bring out peculiarities and similarities of the “Italian peoples”, and their work followed the path mapped by an idea of national identity to bring out through the integration of its elements. Their ideal was not a levelled identity but an articulated one, coming from the fruitful encounter of local traditions. They worked towards a national Italian feeling based on a new ground of fruitful encounter between local traditions, which could encourage their comparison and expression. We know that history did not follow their way. The great engineers makers of political and cultural transformation did not follow the path that could enhance the value of the difference between Italian regions together with their similarities. Nevertheless, the work of Giuseppe Pitrè is still an inexhaustible treasure, and we can find on its countless pages stories that would otherwise be unobtainable. Moreover, it gives evidence of care for culture in terms of philological rigour, love for one's own land and intellectual freedom. (See also, in the website of Claudia Chellini, Percorsi di Pensiero, L'amore per la Sicilia e lo studio delle tradizioni popolari in Giuseppe Pitrè) (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Green Beaubird Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment Southwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three sister of humble social status boast
about their magic chance to realize the greatest wishes
of the three men that they would marry. In our
sixteenth-century tale, the elder sister promises that
if the king's butler marries her, she will quench the
thirst of all the court with one glass of wine. The
second sister then says that if the king's private
chamberlain were her husband, she would provide all the
court with finest clothes, with only one spindle of
yarn. In other versions, their commitment is to provide
all the court with a sumptuous lunch if the king’s cook
will marry one of them, or, if the husband were the
king’s groom, to make his horses the most beautiful in
the world. In all versions of this story, the younger
sister, here named Chiaretta, is the most beautiful, and
eventually says: And I,
if I had the king himself for my husband, I flatter
myself that I would give him three children at one
birth, two sons and a daughter. And each of these
should have long hair braided below the shoulders, and
intermingled with threads of the finest gold, and a
golden necklace round the throat, and a star on the
fore head of each. (The
Green Beaubird e-book, p. 11)
The mother queen and the envious sisters
then get rid of the three babies, closing them in a box
and casting it into a river, so that they should be
dragged away and die. But a miller – in other versions a
fisherman, a hermit, a pirate, or the king’s gardener –
rescues them and, together with his wife, he grows them
up.
…and
up in the tall tree lived the beautiful green bird,
which hopped about from bough to bough in lively
fashion, uttering the while words which seemed rather
divine than human. (Ibid. p.
59)
Their sister waits for a long time for their
return, then she understands that they are lost. She
mourns their death, then she sets off, …she
resolved to try her own fortune. So she mounted a
mettlesome horse, and rode on and on till she came to
the fair meadow where the green bird was hopping about
on the tall tree and softly talking. There the first
things she saw was her brothers' horses, which were
grazing on the turf, and, casting her eyes upon the
statues, she saw that two of them must be Acquirino
and Fluvio, for the unhappy youths, though turned into
marble, retained their features exactly as in life.
Serena dismounted, and going softly up to the tree she
laid hands on the green bird from behind (Ibid.,
p. 59-61).
Chiaretta is in a dungeon, her sisters do
nothing but envy her. This would be an unhappy ending,
with the evil female actants winning over the innocent
young mother and her wonderful children. It would mean
the stop of generations, because there is no heir in
this fairy tale's kingdom. But what was impossible for
these actants becomes possible for the princes of the
following generation. The three twin princes have golden
hair, a golden necklace, and a star on their forehead.
These signs mean a kind of election. They are symbols of
a supernatural protection, giving the three children
bountiful means to meet their material needs, enriching
the humble persons who had saved them from the waters.
Moreover, they are elected from birth, in their same
body. Nobody could never ever steal their virtues. The
stars shining on their foreheads - in some versions only
on the princess' one - might be the pictorial
translation of a popular saying: to be born under a lucky star.
The princess and the two princes are ready
to risk their life to get their aim, and they catch the
green beau-bird. The magical bird opens the way to the
final agnition, which entails a happy ending for parents
and children. In the fairy tales there are other happy
ending like this, including a kind of triumph of truth
and justice both for old and new generation. Here the
king punishes the envious women, his mother and
Chiaretta's two sisters, and defeats evil. We saw a story first telling of a poor girl
who becomes a queen, meeting the desire of the king, to
have wonderful heirs. But the king, who would be happy
because she realizes his desire, is faraway when his
children are born, and he, entrusting his wife to his
envious mother and Chiaretta's sisters, is unable to
protect her. The second part of the story tells of a
young princess, their daughter, becoming melancholy when
she knows that she misses three wonderful objects. It
tells also of her two brothers, who are ready to risk
their life to fulfil her wish. The love and action of
her brothers is necessary, but it is not enough to
complete the task. To get the third wonder, the Green
Beaubird - who is able to say words seeming more divine
than human -, the princes turn into marble statues. The
princess then acts by herself, since her brothers did
not come home, understanding that they died.
A Grand Tour of Fabulando, Griselda
and The Green Beaubird, will be online as soon as
possible. 'I am
come to marry Griselda, but first I would fain know of
her somewhat in thy presence.' Accordingly, he asked
her if, and he took her to wife, she would still study
to please him, nor take umbrage at aught that he
should do or say, and if she would be obedient, and
many other like things, to all of which she answered
ay (Giovanni
Boccaccio 1886, p. 518)
Finally, the marquis gives back Griselda her
children and the dignity that she has deserved thanks to
her incredible patience. This ending is essentially the
same of The Green
Beaubird.
Wonderful patient Griselda! And the Marquis
was introduced by Boccaccio/Dioneo as a perfect knight
and a good ruler, loved by his subjects.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Princess
Belle Étoile Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment Southnortheastwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This fairy tale was written by Marie-Catherine
Le Jumel de Barneville, Baroness d'Aulnoy,
according to the taste of the times of the Sun King. The
source of Mme d'Aulnoy is the Italian 15th
century fairy tale The
Green Beaubird (L'Augel Belverde) by
Giovan
Francesco
Straparola. The French writer expanded the story
turning it into a little Bildungsroman, but her
interventions enriched neither its model's meaning, nor
its narrative rhythm.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L'Oiseau
Bulbul Hezar Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment Southnortheastwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This fairy tale, one of the many versions of The Green Beaubird, is a true gem, if you like following migrations and interesting meetings between different cultures. Like The Green Beaubird, it is located in the southnortheastwest quadrant, and its injunction is the Gibbet of the Death Sentence. Some fairy tales look alike, like brothers and sisters, and their features, coming from their parents - the previous versions which made it to us - are often impossible to decisively ascribe to one or the other family branch. They may come from relatives who are more distant - let alone oral stories or forgotten manuscripts. Here we find the envious sisters playing the role of the old queen, the main female actant's mother-in-law, in the story told by Straparola. Here the sisters, in keeping with their proclaimed intentions, marry the sultan's baker and head cook respectively, while the youngest sister, who was also the most beautiful, became the Sultana. At home with her sisters, she had said:
The Sultana gives birth to three wonderful descendants, but not all in one delivery like in The Green Beaubird, but one after another. However, each time her envious sisters try to eliminate her children, replacing them with a pup, a kitten, and a piece of wood respectively. After the third birth, the Sultan imprisons his poor bride in a cramped cell near the city Mosque, ordering all passers by to spit in her face. But, as is always the case in stories of this type, the three wonderful princes - two brothers and a sister - are rescued and raised by a helper character, here the Sultan's groundskeeper. There is no further persecution from the envious aunts, and the desire of the three magic objects comes from an Oriental motif. An old Muslim devotee visits the wonderful palace of the three princes and says to the princess that it is beautiful, but it is missing three wonderful things: the singing tree, the golden water and the speaking and singing bird, Bulbul Hezar. The Oriental motif of the old devotee suggesting to a princess what her palace is missing, is the last part of Alaaddin and the Wonderful Lamp, often cut from the more widespread versions. (On this, see also: Adalinda Gasparini 1993, namely the sixth chapter, Da servo a padrone, da padrone a servo: l'uovo del Rukh, pp. 165-184) Like in every version, the brothers set off to fulfill their sister's desire, risking their lives, but in this version they turn into black stones. Their sister then sets off to look for them, she captures the winged helper and brings her brothers back to life. Thanks to Bulbul Hezar they discover who their father is and reveal their mother's innocence. And they live together happily ever after. The Christian Arab Hannà, a Maronite from Aleppo, told this story to Antoine Galland, who had been the first European translator of One Thousand Nights and One Night. Galland was looking for other stories for his collection, because he had exhausted his Syrian manuscript of 14th century, with great success with the Parisian public. Galland entitled this fairy tale Histoire des deux sœurs jalouses de leur cadette. The talking bird, who will make the happy ending possible, is here named Bulbul Hezar. It is impossible to state if the core of this fairy tale came directly from Syria or if it had come to Syria from Europe. The Venetian Straparola, who might have spent many years in the near East on behalf of Venice, the Serenissima repubblica, could have reworked an oriental motif. Nevertheless, the Maronite Hannà must have believed that the story of the bird Bulbul Hezar belonged to his heritage, and Antoine Galland did not hesit to publish it at the conclusion of his One Thousand Nights and One Night. Let us remember that we owe to the Maronite Hannà - whose existence we know of from Galland's journal - some of the most popular stories that were incorporated in the Arabic collection with Antoine Galland. No fairy tale of these belongs to the 14th century manuscripts of One Thousand Nights and One Night that preceded the first French translation. Among these fairy tales, let's remember Aladdin and the Wonderful Lamp, Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves, The Magic Flying Horse (see also, Adalinda Gasparini 1993, namely the Appendice al capitolo quarto. Una storia della storia di Aladino: Kabikàj - Fiaba originaria e sogno originario. Un contributo psicoanalitico al problema filologico, pp. 81-97). Fabulando offers the e-book of L'Oiseau Bulbul Hezar with two versions of this story. The first comes from the Journal of Galland, which was written after Hanna had told it to him. The second is the fairy tale pubished by Galland as the last story told by the great storyteller Shahrazàd, ending his Mille et une nuits. Even if you are not a scholar, you can enjoy this e-book, and understand how Galland, a great Arabist, traveler and translator, worked to introduce the grand Arabic collection to Europe. Galland's translation, together with many later editions, deeply influenced the European imaginary, which in turn stimulated the first Arab editions, which started to be published in the early 19th century (for a brief history of the versions of the Thousand Nights and a Night, see Adalinda Gasparini 2003b). (AG) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Daughters of the Wild Cabbages' Gatherer Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment Southnortheastwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is no storytelling more democratic than fairy tales, which reside with the same grace in the hallowed halls of culture and in the peasant farmyards. And there are no stories that can be loved with the same passion by children and adults alike, belonging to religions or ideologies different from each other or even fighting each other. From the Court of the Sun King or from the ending story of Le mille et une nuits retold by Antoine Galland, just one step is required to reach Sicily in the late 1800s, and listen together with Giuseppe Pitré to the same story told by an illiterate storyteller. Referring to the note about Princess Belle Étoile, or L'Oiseau Bulbul Hezar, we can continue the story starting from the feat of the maiden, so tied up with her brothers that each of them was ready to risk his life for the other. This loving bond among female and male members of the same family withstands all versions. This is why only the new generation can dissolve the envious plots that had cruelly condemned their innocent mother, leaving their realm without heirs. They can perform the feat that make possible to find their parents and free their mother. In fairy tales, every time a king does not protect his bride with his presence, she falls into the hands of her female antagonists, be it the old queen, who is the king's mother, or, like in this tale, the protagonist's envious sisters. The wonderful babies of the young queen are abandoned in the open to be devoured by dogs, but three fairies protect them and send a doe to nourish them with its milk. They grow up and when the king sees them he thinks that they are the children promised by his wife, and invites them to his palace. The envious sisters understand who they really are and try to kill them. But the children obtain three magic objects, the last of which is the talking bird, who will reveal the truth. This story, like the two fairy tales quoted above, has its first ancestor in The Green Beaubird (Straparola, 16th century) and is a version of other folk tales. See also, in Fabulando, The Sing-Song of Sibyl Sarah, and The Bird Bulbul Hezar. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Sing-Song of Sibyl Sarah Labyrinth of the Impossible Commitment Southnortheastwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Here we have a folk variant of The Green Beaubird from Tuscany; another variant comes from Sicily, The Daughters of the Wild Cabbage's Gatherer. The titular creature, endowed with the ability to speak, to wield magic, and with the power of divination, turns in this story into The Sing-Song of Sibyl Sarah. It is difficult to catch it, no less than catching the Beaubird: let's just say that it requires some magic help. Like in every other version, the princes fail the feat they set out to accomplish and become marble statues. It is then their sister, the princess, who catches the Song and Sound by grabbing the hair of Sibyl Sarah ..a limp-looking shadow, with long wild hair loosely hanging down her shoulders (The Sing-Song of Sibyl Sarah e-book, p. 49). The Italian Sara is a person's name, but it may stand for Sacra: the ancient Romans called Sacra (Sacer) their Sibyl. This character, a little fragment of the Roman culture in a folk tale, gives access to a truth which is otherwise difficult to see: the origin of the three twin princes and the unfair sentence against their innocent mother. Equally difficult was the uneasy access to Hades, which the classic Sibyl showed to the ancient heroes. What is this thing named the Sing-Song of Sibyl Sarah, so magical that it gives the princess the power to bring back to life her two brothers, who had become statues? Having it - whatever it is - the three siblings can then find their true parents, and moreover show their mother's innocence. The illiterate storyteller tells professor Gherardo Nerucci - who was listening to her and writing the story - that it was a thing, but no one knows what it looked like (ibid., p. 39). What this fairy tale teaches us is that the last and decisive feat - for which such a magic thing is necessary - is to give a true word the chance to emerge. Truth alone can disperse in a blink of an eye the lie of envy, which ruled the events instead of the faraway king and his helpless wife. Let us finally remember that the Italian word parola (word), has the same origin as parabola, fabula, and fiaba (fairy tale). (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is the sixty-seventh and last fairy tale we enclosed in Fabulando. We did not think that sixty-six tales were not enough for our aim, when we read this Russian tale and simply falling in love with this little Ivan, despised like Cinderella, like her so near by the fire, like her worthy of a magic helper. The fairy told by Perrault's onwards, and filmed by Disney, comes from a world of magic creatures visible only by the main actant, and the fairy fills the void left by her dead mother. After his death the father of Ivan appears to provide his youngest son with Sivka-Burka, the magic horse with whom Ivan can conquer the princess and become czar. In Aschenputtel, the Grimm's Cinderella, the oppressed girl gets her magic dresses and shoes from the white bird who appears on the hazel-tree grown up on her mother's grave. The motif of growing a tree is in La gatta Cennerentola by Basile, the first printed version of this world-famous fairy tale; Cinderella asks and receives from a fairy visited by her father a date seed, she grows it and gets from it beautiful dresses and precious shoes. In other folk tale of Cinderella there is the dead mother who reveals her oppressed daughter how she can get magic dresses to meet the prince. These analogies between Little Ivan and Cinderella are very interesting, but not enough to add a new tale to our collection: we desired that Fabulando had the Russian tale with its unsurpassed poetic representation of the male eros. Endowed by his father of the magic horse, Ivan flies to the daughter of the czar, where she gives him a ring, the sign of recognition, analogous to the precious shoe of Cinderella. (AG, 15/02/22) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Little
Chickpea Gibbet of the Death Sentence Southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Like many fairy tales, Little Chickpea begins with the lack of children. The despair of the barren woman ends when her wish is granted beyond any reasonable measure, and she becomes immediately a merciless killer of all her chickpea-children. The children magically coming from a pot may represent an insufficient distinction between nourishment and fertility. This confusion reveals a woman's mournful feeling of emptiness: she longs for a baby in her womb to sate her archaic hunger. But a child can never really fulfill this function, because this uneasy emptiness depends on a hurt in the mother's childhood relationship with her own mother. Only one little chickpea-child survives thanks to his cunning: he hides in the keyhole and comes out only when his mother weeps, expressing her desire of at least one child, and promises what Chickpea asks her, namely not to kill him. Longing for children and loving them, does not keep out the parent's aggressiveness, which children feel with understandable fear. The size of the little main actant is a metaphor for the weakness of the child, who feels at the mercy of its parents, who are also its masters. The intelligence and the desire to live of the child forms its strength. Children love to listen to fairy tales where the little one overcomes big characters and insurmountable obstacles, thanks to its own talents or to a magic aid. Not only in children's stories do we find tales where the little one triumphs over the big one: let's remember, for a biblical example, David and Goliath, and for a classical example, Ulysses and the Cyclops Polyphemus. The confusion of generation and nourishment is a recurring children's fantasy about the mystery of life. There is an ancient Greek myth about this issue. Hesiod (8th century b. C.) tells in his Theogony the story of Cronus, the father-god, second king of the cosmos, who incorporates his children as soon as his sister bride, their mother Rhea, gives birth to them. If we were to follow a literal interpretation, we might think that this myth means that the master father devours his children because he is afraid that one of them could dethrone him. But we have to remind that when the last child, Zeus, escapes his father's mouth and frees his brothers and sisters, they come out perfectly grown up. Then we can understand this incorporation like a second birth, from the father. Coming back to our fairy tale, we see that Chickpea hides in the keyhole, an ancient symbolic place that could suggest a second birth, happening through language, through an agreement. In the version of this tale rewritten by Italo Calvino (Little Chick-Pea), the little child does not leave his refuge before his father comes home. Only when the man says to his wife that she could have spared at least one child, Chickpea comes out, shouting: "Father, father! Here I am!" A mother's desire is not enough to give life to a child, not only because she needs a father to fecundate her ovum. The father legitimates his child limiting the mother's power, and inserts it in the symbolic order. His magic birth and his tiny height lead Chickpea to many trials: he is again enclosed in a womb, when a cow devours him, and again he comes out. His final release depends on the help of his father. When children listen to this fairy tale, they find words to name their fantasies about the issue of generation. Then they know through Chickpea, who is much more smaller than them, that using their intelligence they can overcome their fears. Moreover, they can count on their parent's help, even if sometimes they may look cruel like the mother of this tale. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Enchanted Doe Gibbet of the Death Sentence Southeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This fairy tale has a double male main actant, like The Raven and The White Ricotta, and the starting motif of the succession is the death sentence decreed by the mother queen against the her son's doppelganger, who is the son of one of her ladies-in-waiting. The mother queen cannot bear that her son's love for his doppelganger is greater than his love for her. She fails to appreciate the fact that a servant has given birth to a son identical to hers, the Crown Prince, as if their magic births did not come from the same sea-dragon's heart. The Enchanted Doe is the first of the three tales by Basile retold by Matteo Garrone in his film Tale of Tales (Italy/France 2015). It is a beautiful film, very precious for us, since we love and study fairy tales, their meaning, their movement over the centuries. Garrone is a storyteller-director, able to retell Basile's stories giving us new versions of them, as vigorous as the ancient ones. Let us first notice how the Tale of Tales by Garrone, as a narrative whole, presents through three stories the theme we have chosen for Fabulando, the succession of generations: - in The Enchanted Doe, the sterile king has to die to give life to his heir; - in The Flayed Old Woman, the king who loathes old hags, and hunts both animals and women, thinks that he is getting a beautiful girl when he really has an old woman; and in the end he is still alone and with no heir (The Discovered Old Woman, Basile, Tenth Diversion of the First Day; pp. 97-108; notice that the right translation of Basile's title, La vecchia scorticata, is The Flayed Old Woman); - in The Flea the king does not want to give a husband to his only daughter, keeping her in his room like he does with the flea that he is tenderly growing. He risks losing forever his only heir (The Flea, Basile, Fifth Diversion of the First Day; pp. 47-54); Among the three fairy tales chosen by Matteo Garrone for his film, Fabulando features The Enchanted Doe, suggesting a comparison between the movie version and Basile's original story. Like the comparison between The Raven and The White Ricotta, this comparison notices some significant variants, to appreciate the features and the meaningful beauty of both these fairy tales. The two tales, told in different centuries with different expressive means, may reveal something about our present and something of the baroque century of Basile, with the same storytelling richness. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the poster of Tale
of Tales, right in the foreground, the
mother-queen stands wearing her gorgeous red gown with
black embroideries, the same she wears in the
labyrinth of Donnafugata. She looks sad, even more
than in any film's scene. The head of the sea dragon,
mouth open, comes out behind her gown, down on the
left, while the king, covered with his metallic diving
suite, is half plunged into the water. He stands also
behind his queen, wearing royal clothes, together with
the king of the second story, hunter of young girls.
Between her and the two kings there are the princess
of The Flea, the old woman turned into a
beautiful girl, whose body is covered only with red
pre-Raphaelite hair, the third king looking at his
flea, and some half-dressed woman from the harem of
the second king. All the naked or half-dressed woman
appearing in the Tale of Tales are in this
poster, probably because they can draw more spectators
than any other image. In the background, we see the
Italian castles chosen by Garrone for the three
stories he retold from Basile's collection. In our
opinion, the Italian locations chosen by Garrone look
even more fabulous than the sets constructed on movie
studios, as well as the giant flea and the
queen-monster, realised by Italian artisans, are more
convincing and impressive than any monster created by
a computer. We notice this because Garrone understood
better than others the deepest strength of Basile’s
fairy tales, which, however different, is the strength
of folk fairy tales, at all times and in each
country.This strength comes from their inseparable
presence of reality and fantasy, because their
storytelling gives life to impossible possibilities. We can see on the web also another poster of the film, maybe less attractive for spectators, indeed meaningful for us. There is only a cube, with a white labyrinth on each face: on the upper face a small mother queen is wandering alone, still wearing her red and black gown. It is difficult to understand this powerful mother, so that it is almost impossible for her son to exit from her labyrinthine complexity. Nevertheless, fairy tales, taken as a whole, are a labyrinth, be they the fifty tales written by Basile or his three tales retold by Garrone after nearly four centuries. The imagine of the poster, that we can see only on the web, gives us a precious key to understand the topicality of Garrone's film: the mother queen is a labyrinth for her son, but she is also a human being lost in the labyrinth of contemporary storytelling, unequalled image of life's labyrinth. If the Tale of Tales does not get the public success that it would deserve, this can depend only on its lack of any reassuring and comforting message. Being a mirror of life, fairy tales are not reassuring or comforting: they simply tell something true. Garrone links his three tales with some circus artists, played only by Italian actors. We see them in the first scene, going to the royal palace of Longtrellis, where they give their performance amusing all but the black dressed sterile sad queen. They then brighten the wedding party of the king and the old woman changed into a beautiful girl. In the third - and last - story, they help the princess to escape from her ogre husband, but the ogre reaches and kills them all. The brutality of the ogre, who is nearly unable to speak, gives no room to the artists, who are free and give freedom. The final coronation of the princess of The Flea might be the fairy-tale film's happy conclusion, but Garrone gives us another ending. The princess turns her gaze upwards, and we see, together with her and all guests, a young fire-eater acrobat walking on a flaming wire stretched between the towers of Castel del Monte. He might be the same fire-eater acrobat who had brought on his shoulders the princess, walking on a wire stretched over an abyss. This ending image of the acrobat, balancing himself over the castle's towers, against the azure sky, tells us of a possible balance. In Garrone's film, the company of acrobats, actors, jugglers and fire-eaters, represents the art, various like storytelling, which composes fairy tales and is a fairy tale itself. It might be the only possible balance, the only living beyond the power's walls and towers. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hänsel and Gretel Gibbet of the Death Sentence Southwestnortheast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The gingerbread house is an image nobody
forgets: how incredibly appealing and tempting a
picture this is, and how terrible the risk one runs
if one gives in to the temptation. The child
recognizes that like Hänsel and Gretel, he
would wish to eat up the gingerbread house, no
matter what the dangers. The house stands for oral
greediness and how attractive it is to give in to
it. The fairy tale is the primer from which the
child learns to read his mind in the language of
images, the only language which permits understanding before intellectual
maturity has been achieved. The child needs to be
exposed to this language, and must learn to be
responsive to it, if he is to become master of his
soul. (Bruno
Bettelheim, p. 161) The
injunction of the Gibbet of
the Death Sentence, with which this very
famous tale begins, concerns primary aspects of the
mind, and implies at its core a fatal risk. In this
tale by the Grimm Brothers the male and female main
actants can overcome this risk only thanks to their
alliance. Then there is a happy ending, which in Hänsel
and Gretel puts an end to the famine that
provoked a death sentence for both
filial actants. Their father tries to object
to his wife, but giving up to her he displays a lack
of resources: he cannot set limits to such a conflict
of the maternal sphere. Melanie
Klein’s psychoanalytic theory provides an easy
interpretation to Hänsel and Gretel. According
to her, the baby does not divide itself from its
mother: it waves between a heavenly well-being, when
it is completely sated, and a deadly anguish, when it
is starving and nobody comes to satisfy it. Whoever
listens to the scream of a newborn baby, can feel the
boundless despair sometimes expressed by small
children: In grown-ups it can emerge again, for
example in the despair of the abandoned lover, or in
the deadly anguish of panic attacks. According
to Melanie Klein, the baby somehow incorporates
the source of its well-being through its fantasy, as
if it could become the owner of its feeding and take
cover from starving. The baby’s fantasy then
contemplates a good mother, which sates it and
provides it with a happy life. But it also
contemplates a bad mother, which starves it and
plunges it into despair. Hänsel,
the main male actant, is the active side of the young
generation: he defends both his own and his sister’s
life, staying awake to listen to his parents talking
about their cruel resolution, and deciding to go out
in the night to fill his pockets with little white
pebbles glistening in the moonlight. Thanks to these
little pebbles, the children can find their way back
home, but Hänsel cannot replicate his cunning plan
because his mother has blocked the front door. Then
the boy sacrifices his small piece of bread to drop
the crumbs onto the path. Hänsel walks behind his
parents to mark the path, and when they reproach him,
he excuses himself pretending that he was saying
goodbye to his white kitten or to his little pigeon.
When they are again abandoned by their parents, he
reassures Gretel; but this time they cannot find their
way back home, because the birds of the forest have
eaten all the crumbs. Then hunger, tiredness, and fear
lead them to eat a house made of bread, cake, and
clear sugar, without thinking of the danger. In connection to this, we can think of all adult addictions as rooted in an archaic anguish, so potent that it stops any thought. In my psychoanalytic practice, I have listened to patients who suffer from serious eating disorders tell me how their mind is empty throughout their bulimic binges or self-induced vomiting. These patients, who are usually quite smart, tell me that simply their thoughts disappear, as if compelled by a curse. The sweet and edible house is the opposite of the famine strangling the parent’s house, and of the hunger that the children suffered in the wood. Nonetheless, the full satisfaction that eating the house quickly gives them, quickly turns into its opposite, because the witch of the gingerbread house wants to eat Hänsel and Gretel. The old hag forces Gretel to serve her by cooking and cleaning, and cages Hänsel to fatten him up in order to eat him later. The male main actant, here representing the side of thought, cannot move, and he seems destined to be devoured, without any way out. Nevertheless, the story also tells that the witch was short-sighted: this could mean that the archaic features are powerful, but they cannot win over real, cunning thought. This reminds us of Ulysses’ cyclops, who had only one eye: his huge strength could not stop the hero of intelligence, who defeats him. In the fairy tale of Puss in Boots, the same thing happens between the little smart cat and the powerful ogre. (About this issue, see also Puss Tells her History) A boy can think freely, even in a cage, and when the witch tests his finger to find out if he is fat enough, Hänsel sticks out a little bone. He thus saves some time. But male thought, while necessary, is not enough to overcome a maternal death sentence, when there are no helpful parental actants. When the witch decides to boil and eat Hänsel, even if he is not fat, Gretel cries her heart out, then she appeals to the heavenly Father and after her prayer she thinks of a trick, and acts with her arms - her own body - against the body of the witch. The girl convinces the witch to enter the oven, where the old woman was planning to bake bread to eat together with the boiled Hänsel. Then Gretel locks up the witch and runs to open her brother’s cage. To overcome a death sentence convicted by maternal and paternal actants, an alliance is needed between female and male main actants. It is moreover necessary that both actants never give up fighting using their resources and strength, even when their situation may look hopeless. Fairy
tales often tell about cruel parental actants and
innocent filial actants, and the story says that the
young actants finally win. Nevertheless, thinking that
fairy tales tell that young people are better than old
people, is a mistake that stops us from understanding
them. In a similar way fairy tales are not understood
when a psychoanalytic interpretation uses them as a
demonstration of one of its theories. Arranging
Fabulando’s Sixty-seven fairy
tales according to the Fairy Map of Succession,
we treasured various psychoanalytic interpretations.
Nonetheless, we think that fairy tales can be used or
interpreted following any kind of theory or plan, but
their value and their strength is beyond any bad or
good use we may make of an interpretation. A long
chain of storytellers brought us, through many
centuries, fairy tales that we still feel bright and
true, which do not tell that children are better than
parents, as may seem to be the case at a superficial
glance. There is
a last feature we want to point out in Hänsel and
Gretel. Beyond the death sentence of the
parents, beyond the thought and the actions of the
allied female and male filial actants, there is
something that does not belong to parental actants, be
they fathers, mothers or witches. There is something
that holds up the confidence and the hope of children,
when all their resources are used up. Let us remember
the father who leaves his children in the forest, but
rejoices in their return after the first desertion,
and he is happy with them at the end, while their
mother died like the old witch - maybe defeated
together with her?. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sweet
Diamond Pie Fortress of Solitude Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the fairy tale Sweet Diamond Pie,
or Pinto Smauto as Giambattista Basile entitles
it, the female main actant, named Betta, is a girl who
does not want to get married. Its injunction is then Fortress of Solitude. The
injunction is here paternal and we find this tale in the
northwest quadrant, since Betta wanted
only to live with her father, and she “hated the swords
and she was a game preserve where no hunter could chase,
a store where nobody could touch any good” (Sweet
Diamond Pie e-book, p. 9).
But one day she asks her father, who is a merchant and is about to leave for business, to buy her sugar, almonds, essences, pearls, sapphires, and rubies. As soon as she gets all this, she kneads a husband for herself. Then, remembering Pygmalion, she prays the gods to give life to her ideal husband. In the tenth book of The Metamorphoses, the Latin Ovide told the story of Pygmalion, who was the king of Cyprus. He would not get married, because his island’s women sickened him after he had seen them prostituting themselves. This had happened because Venus had made them mad when they had failed to appreciate her divinity. Pygmalion, who was also a masterly sculptor, carved such a beautiful woman in ivory that nobody had ever seen a beauty like that. Gazing at the ivory statue he fell in love with it, so that he caressed and kissed it, gave it presents and took it to his bed. Finally he prayed Venus to give life to his ivory statue, so that he could have a real wife. The goddess granted his wish and Pygmalion could live happily forever after with Galatea, his statue turned into a living woman. The act of Pygmalion is a creative act, since the sculptor king creates a statue from something already existing, like ivory. Michelangelo spoke about the sculptor’s art, saying that the artist gives freedom to the image that is imprisoned in the marble, a figure that the artist could see thanks to his sensibility. Whate'er conception a great artist fires, Its answering semblance latent lies within A block of marble; but the hand alone, Swayed by the intellect, can give it form. (Michelangelo, Sonnets, 69) The act of Betta too is a creative act, even if with different features: the maiden mixes distinct elements to bind them, then she gets something that is not the simple juxtaposition of those elements, but something else. It is a compound with its own consistency and nature, by which the girl gives shape to a statue. Let us notice this difference between the giving shape to a figure by the male sculptor, like Pygmalion and Michelangelo, and the female one of Betta. We could see here two different kinds of creative act, belonging to different spheres of sense, as if there were two different kinds of creative acts that cultural tradition attributes to males and females. First, this distinction refers to the complex question of the generation of a new life. Both Pygmalion’s myth and Betta’s fairy tale deal with the same theme: the Greek sculptor and the Basile’s maiden fabricate for themselves a figure to get all they desire in their partner. Pygmalion builds up his ideal wife just as Betta builds up her ideal husband. From here on, myth and fairy tale diverge. As soon as Betta gets life for her Sweet Diamond Pie, she loses him. She acted to give shape and life to her ideal husband, and now she has to clash with the unforeseeable, which belongs to reality. Another woman, a powerful queen, falls in love with Sweet Diamond Pie and he follows her without batting an eyelid. Then Betta, who is already pregnant, begins her journey to look for her lost husband. She does not wear seven pairs of iron shoes or seven iron dresses, and she does not have seven iron clubs which another character, Ginevra, was wearing down along the same route. Ginevra is the female main actant of a Florentine version of Pig King, collected by Vittorio Imbriani in 1877 (See Re Porco, available on the website Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole). Both Betta and Ginevra will find their husband, and meet one or more old women who give them three magic formulas or a nut, an almond and a hazelnut. By their magic, Betta and Ginevra get as many galanterie - amazing precious objects. Thanks to each of these galanterie they get a night to spend together with their forgetful love, who in the meantime married that queen. In both these fairy tales, the king does not hear his true wife, because the powerful queen had given him a glass of wine with opium. Only a guard or a cobbler listens to that female voice that every night cries and repeats her story. The listener informs the king, who eventually stays awake, and remembers his true wife. In these fairy tales the female and male main actants get their happy ending together. The narrative motif is clearly the same, but it belongs to different stories, as happens in the fairy-tale world. Let us notice that Pig King has a male main actant, while in Sweet Diamond Pie, as we saw, the main actant is Betta. The difference is determining: when we chose to make a map to sail between fairy tales we first realized that we had to distinguish the fairy tales with a female main actant from those that have a male main actant. In the Fairy Map of Succession, the first kind of tales are in the west quadrants, the second ones are in the east quadrants. Without claiming to supply a theory about what gives fairy tales their structure, we would say that a story gets its unique feature through the particular combination of different motifs. Every fairy tale has a starting point, giving it its meaning and its subject. It may happen that the refusal to get married leads Betta first to knead her ideal husband and then to go a long way to find him, in a fairy tale quite different from the tale where Ginevra is acting. This character, as we said, is not the main actant, because her journey belongs to the story of a prince, a male main actant. He was born as a pig under a curse, and to turn into a man he needs a girl who would fulfil for him an impossible task. This is how the fairy-tale motifs do; they combine and combine again, as do words: each of them has its own meaning, but they may give our speech a specific colour and a specific shape. To express what we would really mean we need the whole speech. As well as a word - a single word extrapolated from its context - may be attractive, reminding us of other words or arousing images and memories of ours, a single fairy-tale motif might charm and move us. They can speak to a hidden side of ours, showing us a way that we did not know. Moreover, just as we cannot reduce a speech to a single word, a single motif cannot encompass a fairy tale, because a story comes from the integration of many motifs. The arrangement of these motifs gives shape to the storytelling, since they connect themselves to each other to make a thread of meaning. Then this thread leads us in a faraway country, a long time ago… In this country, obscure sentences may prove to be powerful magic formulas, if the actants, remembering them, are humble enough to welcome a gift even if they do not know how it might help them. When the old woman told her the three magic formulas (Tricche varlacche, ca la casa chiove, Anola tranola, pizze fontanola, Tafar’e tammurro, pizze ’ngongole e cemmino [e-book, cit., pp. 31-33]), that are nonsense in Italian too, Betta might think that they were only odd words, but she however thought that they were a gift for her from the old woman. Then Betta kept them as a precious gift, and she could remember and use them at the right moment, in her extreme need. Those nonsensical words, the three magic formulas gave her the chance to get back her beloved husband, because as soon as she said those words wonderful galanterie appeared. Galanterie are small precious objects like little animals or other finely crafted things, made to arouse wonder. They attract so much the thief queen that each time she allows Betta to spend one night with Sweet Diamond Pie. The story tells that this queen does not know the right value of the things, unlike Betta, who acknowledges the value of words which seem useless. The foreign queen craves so much for the dazzling golden galanterie - a little coach, a cage with a bird studded with precious stones, and silk clothes embroidered with gold -, that to get them she gives Betta her place near her husband. Moreover, she thinks to risk nothing at all, believing that her trick, to put opium into her husband's wine, will be enough. Measuring and valuing, the usurper queen does not see the possibility that Betta coud get the most precious thing - the ideal husband Sweet Diamond Pie - giving away the jewelled galanterie only to spend a night with him. The power of Betta’s desire goes beyond the usurper queen's measure, and when her situation looks desperate, a guard hears her and informs the king. The guard represents a wakening actant, while the cobbler is a humble one. But we remember that he makes and repairs shoes, which protect the feet, the body’s extremities that make us walk and get us where our desire leads us. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beauty
and the Beast Castle of the Forced Love Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Curiously awaiting the next Disney Beauty and the
Beast, we want to say here something about the way
films and TV series have treated this fairy tale. Let us start saying that Beauty and the
Beast belongs in Fabulando to the
injunction of the Castle of the
Forced Love. This placing offers a way to
understand the difference between Beauty and the
Beast and other tales, like Pig
King, or other stories belonging to our
collective imagination, like Strange Case of Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Stevenson (1886). Beauty leaves home for a reason that is the
opposite of the reason which forces other fairy-tale
female main actants to escape, when their father wishes
to marry them (see also: The Tacconelle of Woody Maria,
Donkey Skin, Rot-Eyes, and The She-Bear).
These stories tell of an incestuous love acted by
the father, who, after the death of his queen, cannot
marry a woman who is not as beautiful as his dead wife.
The two films we quoted above include and
tell this side of the story; in Beastly Beauty
accepts to live with a monster to protect her father
from a lifelong prison sentence, and in La belle et
la bête she does it to protect her father from
death. These two stories are real variants of the fairy
tale Beauty and
the Beast, like Belindu the
Monster. We understand that they are the
same fairy tale, beyond additions and changes in
setting, because we notice the same narrative structure
and the same relation between its actants. We could not
recognize the same story while watching the TV series Beauty
and the Beast. The female main actant, Catherine
Chandler, is a policewoman who really loves her father,
but her main relationship is not with him, but with her
mother. She witnesses her mother's death at the hands of
two killers, and she cannot understand the reasons
behind this murder. She will discover them thanks to her
encounter with Vincent Keller, who was a soldier in
Afghanistan, where he submitted himself to an experiment
of the army. After this experiment, when the ex-soldier
flies into a rage he temporarily turns into a kind of
fierce beast. This reminds us of Dr. Jekyll, who,
drinking a potion he himself created, turns into Mr.
Hide, his alternative beastly personality. It is a
tragic tale, because the dark side overcomes the good
doctor and his death puts an end to the story. Another distinctive feature of this fairy
tale is that the Beast treats Beauty like a true queen.
In the magnificent library of the Beast, Beauty reads
these words: “Ask
for anything you wish: you are mistress of everything
in here”. Her monster is ready to fulfill her wishes; he makes available to her his whole palace and meets all of Beauty's desires. Every day he readies for her a table laden with delicious food, and offers her gorgeous gowns. Then, when she is sad because she is longing for her family, he allows her to go to see her father, risking that she will not come back to him, so that his curse will never break.
In the same way, the Beastly’s main
male actant was turned into a being whose skin is marked
by scars and tattoos, that disfigure his face and his
body. He builds a greenhouse for Lindy who is very fond
of roses, then he learns about poetry because she loves
it, and he writes a long romantic letter. When she,
tired after so many adventures, leans her head against
him, he gently moves her hair away from her face. After
some fearful moments, the girl understands that she has
nothing to fear from the creature who keeps her in his
house. Moreover she, like Beauty, starts to appreciate
his gentle soul. The girl can fall in love with him for
his gentleness. In the Italian TV miniseries La bella e
la bestia, Leon Dalville is a prince, who was
disfigured after the violent death of his wife, more in
his soul than in his body. To hide his slashed face he
wears a mask, which makes him similar to the main
character of the “Phantom of the Opera”, which is scary
for Belle Dubois and the others. But he deserves the
name of the Beast
because of his sadistic behaviour, not for his looks.
This cynical prince has no respect for anyone; he plays
with the lives of others just for fun, to exert his
power. He keeps Belle with him not to break a spell, but
to get a security, until Captain Dubois will settle his
debt, contracted after the wreck of the captain's ship.
In the beastly prince’s palace Belle is a servant,
forced to clean, wash, and suffer his
harassment. This plot belongs to a story different from
our fairy tale. It takes us into another story, Jane
Eyre (Charlotte Brönte, 1847), whose main
character, Mr. Rochester, may remind us of Prince Leon
both in his nature and his destiny. Nevertheless, if we
should think of a male actant similar to Prince Leon
Dalville, among the Beasts populating the country of
fairy-tales, we would choose the Pig King, who
stabs his first and second wives with his tusks. The Pig King, cursed
like other fairy-tale actants to inhabit an animal
shape, does not have the gentle soul of many other such
beasts. He wallows in the mud and dirties
everything he touches. Moreover, he kills the girls who
do not accept him as their husband, unlike the Beauty's
Beast who sadly goes back to his room, when she, night
after night, refuses his marriage proposal. These two stories tell something about two
different male characters. To meet a welcoming female
actant is crucial for both, to find a way to turn back
into human beings, but they follow two different paths. The Pig King first of all
needs to be loved as a beast: Meldina, his third wife,
lets him rub on her beautiful wedding robe, then she
welcomes him, dirty with mud and manure, into the
wedding bed and tenderly covers him. Only after some
time the Pig King reveals
himself to his wife Meldina as a beautiful youth. When
Meldina gets pregnant, and gives birth to a beautiful
heir, she reveals to the royal parents of the Pig that
he is a human being. On the contrary, the beast doesn't demand to be loved just as a beast, but for his noble kindness and generosity. Day after day he tries to get Beauty’s love through his gentle soul, wooing her and fulfilling her wishes. Beauty can slowly understand the heart of her repulsive suitor, and discover beauty where she had seen only a horrible desperate ugliness. (CC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Belindu
the Monster Castle of the Forced Love Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A suprisingly very tender beast, Belindu, lives in this story, poetically told in Sardinia, where a small in Algero speaks a version Catalan of Alghero. Maria, the main actant, picks flowers to sell them and help her father, who had gone bankrupt. Maria loses her way and takes shelter in the castle were Belindu lives alone. The monster forbids her to leave his palace, and treats her like a queen. Maria knows what happens to her family thanks to a magic diamond given her by Belindu. When her parents are ill, she begs the monster to grant her the permission to visit them. Belindu lets her go, even if he does not think that she will come back, but Maria keeps her promise and comes to the palace in the agreed time. This happens on the first time, but the second time she forgets her commitment and when she finally comes back, the castle's door is locked. She cries and calls Belindu, and the door opens, but she cannot find him anywhere. Then she goes on weeping and calling him, and finally she promises that if he will show himself again she will marry him. This breaks the curse that changed the male actant into a monster and the beautiful Prince Belindu marries Maria. The fairy tale is in the northwest quadrant since the story starts with the need of the father of Maria, who loses her way to help him. The female main actant must live with somebody she has not choosen. The unwanted lover treats her like a queen, but he his repulsive. Belindu looks like a monster, in other tales he is an animal, in others it is impossible to see him and know his shape and his name. Let's remember the Latin fabella by Apuleius, Amor et Psyche, which is the prototype of this kind of tales, popular all over Europe. Beauty and the Beast and The Frog Prince have the same injunction, the Castle of the Forced Love (see also: Amor et Psyche, Fabella, website Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole). (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Doralice Castle of the Forced Love Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Doralice tells, like the widespread Donkey-Skin, about the love of and for the father, a love that must be given up, through a hard but necessary toil. The father of this ancient fairy tale, a prince of Salerno, promises his dying wife that he will marry no woman but the one on whose finger her ring will fit. No matter how this promise varies in the following versions, the dying queen forces her husband to marry a copy of herself. When Doralice, their only daughter, is grown up, she puts her mother's ring on her finger, and the father prince decides to marry her. The daughter escapes him following her nanny's suggestion, by entering a closet, but the closet is sold and brought to England, where it is bought by the King for his own room. When nobody is there, Doralice comes out of her hideout, and lovingly takes care of the English King’s room. After time the King discovers her and decides to marry her, and she gives birth to two children. But her father hears about Doralice, and sneaks into her palace disguised as a merchant, offering her golden distaffs and spindles. To get them the young queen gives him a night to spend together with her children. The father prince kills the poor children and lays the blame on his daughter. Sentenced to death by the King of England, she is saved by her nanny, who comes to tell the whole true story. Doralice is the only female character in the Fabulando collection who never acts to protect herself or her children, the only sacrificed children with no happy coming back to life. What is the meaning of their sad fate? Let's attempt an interpretation. Doralice never enacts anything by herself, and she leaves her father, disguised as a merchant, besides her children, risking their life to get golden distaffs and spindles. In many fairy tales it happens that the true wife of a king who has forgotten her gets from his false wife a night to spend with him, giving her precious jewels in exchange. These fairy tales end with the main male actant who eventually recovers his memory, and in some versions he asks his courtiers, "Which is my true wife, the one who gave for me all she had, or the one who sold me to get some jewels?" (see, e.g. Re Porco, Tuscan folk tale collected by Vittorio Imbriani, 1877, available in the website Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole). Life and commodities belong to different spheres, and they require a different attitude. To mix them up or put them on the same level, produces negative effects, at least in fairy tales, and elsewhere. The cruel father of Doralice is prince of Salerno: we would like to mention another prince of Salerno, the father of Ghismonda, in the first novella of the fourth day of the Decameron. The Facetious Nights was one of the numberless imitations of Boccaccio's masterpiece, and we can be sure that Straparola was well acquainted with it. The widower prince of Salerno in Boccaccio's novella would have liked to keep with him his only daughter, who had come back to his court as a young widow. Ghismonda has a secret love affair with Guiscardo, who is one of his father's valets. When the prince of Salerno learns this, he has his daughter's lover killed and sends her his heart in a golden cup. Ghismonda pours her tears in the cup, then she adds a powerful poison and drinks the mixture. When her father finally goes to see her, he can only hear and grant her last whish: to be buried together with Guiscardo. Regarding the motif of killing one's infant heirs, some versions of Griselda, the last and hundreth novella of Decameron, tell that the vexed marquess of Saluzzo is charged with the death of her children. Her husband, the marquis, in the prototype of Boccaccio, as well as in the two literary versions - translated by Petrarca in Latin, and by Chaucer in English - tells her that he must eliminate their children because of Griselda's low origin. They could never be accepted as rulers of the marquisate. Let us remember that Giovanni Boccaccio, like Leonardo da Vinci, was an illegitimate son, born out of regular marriage. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Penta
the Handless Forest of the Exile Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This fairy tale begins with an incestuous demand, and we find it in the Northwest Quadrant. But its injunction is not the same as the fairy tales belonging to the type of Donkey-Skin, which begin with the injunction Castle of the Forced Love. Its main actants flee from a father who wants to marry them, while Penta is turned out of her house by her brother-king. Like in the fairy tale Rot-Eyes, the king-father throws out his daughter because she does not fulfil his demand. For this reason the injunction of these two fairy tales is the Forest of the exile. We weighed up the pros and cons of placing these two stories together with those of the type Donkey-skin, beginning with the injunction Castle of the Forced Love. All these female main actants must leave their house after an incestuous demand, the form of which is a demand of absolute love in Rot-Eyes, and a demand of marriage between siblings in Penta the Handless. The female main actant is in any case forced to oppose the realisation of the incest. Nonetheless, our choice of a different injunction did not only depend on this difference - an expulsion instead of a flight, an involuntary loneliness instead of a voluntary seclusion. It depended on some motifs that we can see in the story of Penta and of Rot-Eyes, which are instead lacking in the story of the type of Donkey-Skin, which stages other motifs, in turn lacking in the others. In all the stories of the type Donkey-Skin we find a mark of identity, left by the mother to her daughter as her inheritance. Before dying the queen sets as a condition to the king, if he will remarry, to choose a woman as beautiful as she is, or one who can fit the queen's ring on her finger, or something else of this kind. It is a mother's inheritance, even if it drives the princess right to the incestuous demand of her father (see here Doralice, The She-Bear, Donkey Skin, and The Tacconelle of Woody Maria). In Penta the Handless and in Rot-Eyes, the mother is totally absent, not even mentioned. Moreover, in Penta's story we do not know anything of her father either. The actants of the Donkey-Skin type have a female helper - a fairy or a nanny - who suggest to them to ask the king to give them an impossible love test - like astonishing gowns or the skin of the donkey who daily gives the king solid gold coins. Since the king fulfils all his daughter's wishes, the motherly helper says her to disguise herself and flee. The fairy tales that we find in the Castle of the Forced Love lack something that follows the final wedding of the female main actant: the father-king of Rot-Eyes and the brother-king of Penta eventually acknowledge their mistake, and share the happy ending with their daughter or sister. The incestuous father-king of the type Donkey-Skin disappears after the beginning, as if these fairy tales could not entail a changing of the king and the consequent reconciliation. Both Rot-Eyes and Penta the Handless then stage a grim motif, which makes these stories unsuitable for children. Rot-Eyes' nanny buys the corpse of a hundred-years-old woman, then she cuts off, tans, and sews it on a fine fabric, to give it her fifteen-years-old princess, who then becomes Rot-Eyes. It is a disgusting detail, which corresponds the chilling cut of the hands of Penta, who sacrifices them after her brother said that they were irresistible for him. With the mediation of some German story closer to their time, the Grimm Brothers - who knew Basile's collection well - wrote the story of a girl without hands (Das Mädchen ohne Hände, first edition 1812). The incest and the voluntary amputation of our 17th century version disappeared. An analogy can be traced between the sacrifice of the Grimm Brother's main actant, who lets her hands be amputated by her father to save him from the devil, and the sacrifice of Beauty, who devoting herself to the dangerous Beast saves her father's life. In The Girl without Hands, the Grimm Brothers introduce an all innocent and pure female main actant, who is worthy of being helped by angels, like the saints, the martyrs, and the hermits in the desert of the Christian hagiography. Likewise, it is the devil that introduces evil, freeing the human actants from the burden of cruel and dangerous actions. There is no father-king who does not hesitate to chase away his daughter, or a brother-king who throws his sister into the sea in a wooden chest. Let us now stop with the analysis of the fairy tale of the Grimm Brothers, to give you the chance to compare these versions: The Girl without Hands, first edition, 1812 (with the 1857 edition), and the 17th century first version we chose for Fabulando, which is the first ever published in the world. Let us now come back to our Penta the Handless. Another power is here added to the power that a father-king exercises over his male descendants, namely the power of the male over the female. We find an incestuous demand for love, be it literal or symbolic, here as in Rot-Eyes, in kings lacking male descendants. We analysed Rot-Eyes comparing it with the medieval Breton legend of King Leir and with Shakespeare's tragedy King Lear: Thinking of Penta the Handless we see an analogy with her abandonment to the waters and the Greek myth of Danaë. We will not go into this story, which tells that Danaë's father, the king Acrisius, had learned that the son of his daughter would have killed him. He then prevented the marriage of Danaë imprisoning her in a tower, but Zeus came to her in the form of a golden rain and she conceived Perseus. Then Acrisius threw his daughter and grandson into the sea in a wooden chest. Let us say that when Penta's brother casts her into the sea, she has no child, but she is again cast in the savage reign of Mother Nature when she gives life to a child, after her marriage with a king. They banish her from the palace with her child tied to her shoulders, because she, having no hands, cannot carry it in her arms. We got our illustration for Penta the Handless reworking an image made by Arthur Rackham for Danaë and Perseus, erasing Danaë's baby and hands (to see the references to the original image, Penta the Handless, e-book, p. 57). This analogy between our fairy tale and a Greek myth leads us to a king who wants to master his fate. He unfailingly fails, in fairy tales, in myths, in tragedies, in legends, and in real life. The new generation takes the place of the old one. But for the unconscious logic a temporal link works like a causal link, like in the Latin saying, post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this, therefore because of it). We well know the limit of our physical existence, but we are unable to accept the end of our subjective presence, our unique human presence. This impossibility underlies incest: if a mother's or a father's son or daughter are also their husband or bride, every family relationship overlaps and mingles. So they think to abolish the distance between generations: a way to stop time and therefore remove death. In the psychoanalytic-philological note to Rot-Eyes we observed how this will to master time and death, to last beyond our boundaries, leads to a tragic ending. The incestuous kings of these tales try to do it, but their daughters or sisters go away from them to travel among many risks and dangers. They all walk and walk without any legitimation, and do not act for or against their powerful fathers or brothers, simply because they are away from them, quite lacking of their help, namely their name and means. The female main actant of Rot-Eyes is named after her disgusting disguise, Penta after the hands she sacrifices not to be tightened by the incestuous knot. It is the knot that strangles both the ascendants and the descendants, stopping the stream of generations. Let us now go again over the story, when Penta, having fruitlessly tried with many arguments to change her brother's incestuous demand, asks him what in herself might be so irresistibly ravishing for him. Since the brother-king answers that he finds her hands irresistible, Penta, retiring to her room, orders a slave to cut her hands with an axe. Then,
The king goes into a rampage and casts Penta into the sea in a wooden chest. In a fairy tale to cut one's hands does not mean bleeding to death, because their truth, like that found in dreams, deals with psychic reality, the rules of which do not coincide with those of waking reality. But why does Penta cut her hands off instead of fleeing covered with a hundred-years-old dead woman's skin or that of a donkey? Moreover, why does her brother, who is madly in love with her, cast her into the sea instead of feeling pity for her maiming? Let us classically interpret Penta's sacrifice as an act of self-castration, which she prefers to surrendering to her brother's demand. In this sense we can understand the king's rampage, because this extreme denial makes him impotent, frustrating his omnipotent desire. Only sentencing his sister he can save his desire to rule time and death. We can now try to give an explanation of a motif that we find in stories of every genre: all the characters cast into waters or woods, be they newborn children or young actants, are saved without any exception. They are rejected by the patriarchal order and left to the indomitable reign of Mother Nature. All these stories, be they fairy tales, myths, or legends (even canonical ones, e.g. Moses) tell about an extraordinary subject, growing without a father's legitimacy, namely in an area that is separated from the patriarchal one. We suppose that the training of an autonomous subject (German: Bildung) needs a movement detaching itself from the world measured, classified and ruled by the phallic power. At the end of his/her story, this autonomous subject finds a new legitimate role, but he/she has been hidden for a time in the kingdom of Mother Nature. Rot-Eyes gets her covering skin from her first mother helper, her nanny, and another woman helping her is the mother of her prince. In all fairy tales of the type Donkey-Skin the future mother-in-law of the female main actant helps her. This women's mutual recognition comes after the traumatic separation from the actant embodying the patriarchal power - the father- or brother-king - and foregoes the end of the concealment of the main actant's true identity and beauty. Let us incidentally remember that an illegitimate origin is not rare among great artists, e.g. Giovanni Boccaccio and Leonardo da Vinci. Coming back to Penta lost at sea, the story tells that a man saves her, but his envious wife casts her again into the sea in her wood chest. Then a king saves her, and she becomes the faithful and trustworthy maid of the queen. When the queen dies she asks his husband to take Penta as his second wife, and so he does. But the king is away from her when she gives birth to their child, and the envious woman who cast her again into the sea successfully plots against her, and Penta the handless finds herself alone into the woods, with her baby tied to her shoulders. The female antagonist thus nullifies the female helper, namely the queen who loved Penta so much to give her her place with the king. Penta can serve a woman, even without hands. Penta can sacrifice her hands to show the king that he can demand to master her body, but not her will. And now she is alone, lacking any female helper actant. Giambattista Basile stages at this point in his story a male helper, a lord who is also a magician. He has the same royal power of Penta's incestuous brother and of her husband, who could not protect her, but he has also a magic power, which allows him to deal with things that are hidden to them. He acts like a paternal helper, hosting Penta in his palace, where she can comfortably grow her child. Then he spreads an announcement, inviting whoever has suffered great pain to come to see him and tell their story. Penta's brother and husband meet and tell each other of their loss, of an innocent sister and an innocent wife, unjustly banished with her newborn child. Each of them say that his own pain is the greatest one, and they go together to tell the magician-king. As in Rot-Eyes, the male actant who casts away the female main actant suffers and acknowledges his fault. Thus a joyful recognition is possible, with the magician-king who makes the happy ending complete. He tells Penta to put her stumps under the apron, and when she pulls them out she has again her hands, even more beautiful than before. Penta, her husband and their son live forever with their benefactor, who appoints them his heirs. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rot-Eyes Forest of the Exile Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We
suggest here for Rot-Eyes a
philological-psychoanalytic reading, which is the
common thread of Fabulando. In particular, we suggest
a comparison between this fairy tale,
told by an illiterate story-teller to Gherardo
Nerucci in the 20th century, a
medieval legend of the 12th
century (Geoffrey
of Monmouth, Histories of the Kings of
Britain), and Shakespeare' King Lear.
Having to limit, for reasons of space, our quotes from
these two works, we will provide the following biblio-
and sitographic directions, so that you can enjoy
these two texts, and, hopefully, personally verify the
validity of our interpretation.
The
medieval story, which is the
most ancient source of the story that provided Shakespeare
with
the material for his masterwork, ends with the father
King Leir who, being stripped of everything from his
eldest daughters, seeks the help of the youngest,
Cordeilla, and gets it. Thanks to her help he regains
the throne of Britannia, and when he dies Cordeilla
becomes queen. But the sons of her elder sisters wage
war against her and take the throne. Then Cordeilla
kills herself. Shakespeare's
tragedy ends with King Lear who, carrying the dead
Cordelia in his arms, dies of grief. The
fairy tale has a happy ending, with the female main
actant marrying a prince. Moreover, her father, who is
invited to the wedding celebration, thanks to his
daughter's rouse, understands his mistake and blesses
the daughter whom he had cursed.
Cordeilla
here
acknowledges the hypocrisy of her sisters, and tells
her father that children can declare to love only
their father only as a jest. Her love for him, she
says, is not everything, and after having asked her
father not to question her any more, she warns him
against measuring love. tu vali quanto possiedi means
that the love boasted by her sisters corresponds to
the riches their father can bestow upon them. So much as
thou hast, so much art thou worth, and so much do I
love thee, might mean that whoever requires to
measure love can get it only through material wealth.
You cannot assess feelings, emotions, and love by
measures suitable for material goods. Why
does King Leir, as well as the kings in the other two
stories, reject this truth? It
is not physical death that is unacceptable for the
father-king, but the end of his own being, his own
story. He wants to last beyond his physical existence
that shapes and upholds his human being as unique and
unrepeatable, with joy, pain, good and bad fate. The
generation who is approaching death often tries - like
these father-kings - to dwell and reign in the
heart of the following generation, beyond the boundary
of its life.
If
the king had had male heirs, he would have exerted
over them a double power, being both their king and
their father. Having only daughters, he exerts over
them also a third power, that of the male upon the
female. Thus, if women follow their heart
more than their mind - this is a
basic axiom in patriarchal
culture -, their three-times-ruler can
demand to be the only owner of their heart. This is
for him the only warranty to be sure that the phallic
order that he embodies will last after his death.
If
parents refuse the boundary of their subjectivity,
they are guilty of a titanic arrogance. The ancient
Greeks call übris the
tragic hero's choice to exceed the human boundary,
and inevitably the gods fatally punish this hero. The
ascendants can live in the heart of their descendants
only if the new generation freely chooses to host them
there. For the classic Greeks, the sin of übris
draws subjects to a tragic route, leading to the
destruction of the hero himself and of his unlucky
descendants. This is what happens in Shakespeare's
and in Geoffrey
of Monmouth's stories, which however
are the stories of the father-king, which is their
protagonist. His daughters, Cordeilla and Cordelia
included, act only for - or against - their father.
The female protagonist is a function of the great
king, both in the legend of Leir, King of Britain, and
in Shakespeare's
tragedy, telling of what the unlimited pretensions of
a father entail. At first glance, the father-king
facilitates the succession, abdicating and giving his
kingdom to his daughters, but he really only does it
to soothe his pain in the face of losing his power,
which will happen at the same time as his death.
The
medieval legend builds up the mythic history of
Britain so that it has nothing to envy to the history
of Rome or Athens. In fact Geoffrey
of Monmouth dates the story of
King Leir and his daughters back to Romulus and Remus,
the mythical twins who founded Rome. Here the main aim
is to restore the royal power, punishing the hypocrite
daughters who, by debasing their father, debased the
kingship itself. The royal ruler who wants to
perpetuate himself through his descendants loses
everything, if his youngest daughter does not help
him. Loving him in a truly human way, inevitably
limited, Cordeilla rescues him. Making him regain the
throne, she restores the dignity of the monarchy,
which is the main aim of a legendary history.
If
there is an unlimited power, it is the divine one. It
does not reveal itself to human beings, who may
receive the help of divine grace only if they are
quite free of the sin of übris.
Human beings can experience the dimension of the
infinite on the condition of renouncing the illusion
to be omnipotent and the mastery of their ego.
Back again to Shakespeare: the final moment
of lucidity of King Lear is the ultimate understanding
in the face of his own death, after the failure of all
his illusions, after he has had to acknowledge that his
claim to remove the boundary of his being by demanding
absolute love has sentenced to death also the only
daughter who truly loved and helped him.
Behold yond
simpering dame, It
impossible to state since when human culture placed
inside the lower part of the woman what exists but
goes beyond any master's control, and idealized her superior
part. It is absurd to think that this double
attribution was made by men against women, because the
phallic order has always been the axis mundi for both
men and women. Cordelia and Cordeilla serve their
father until their death. Their sisters die like them,
each claiming for herself all the paternal power. The
death of the father-king's offspring depends on his
absolute dominion, which he imposes on his female
heirs, both legitimizing and delegitimizing them.
Their noble husbands cannot protect them, because the
husbands of the elder daughters follow their wives
against the old king, and the husband of the youngest
gives her the means to help her father.
Before
answering we have to observe the journey of these
female actants, forced to leave the house of their
incestuous father and set off into the world. It is a
dangerous task, but nonetheless the fairy tale tells
that once upon a time a fifteen year old girl could by
herself do it all and achieve her autonomy - namely
her conquest of a throne - and generativity - namely
her happy wedding. The
heroines of tragedies, like Cordelia, and of legends,
like Cordeilla, can help their father, the king who
represents the patriarchal rightful order, but they
must sacrifice their life. Let
us now observe how Puccini stages in his operas
heroines who are poignant summits of feminine beauty
and grace. Among them there is only one soprano who
has a happy ending instead of dying before the curtain
draws, Turandot. It is not a coincidence that she
comes from a collection of fairy tales, Les mille et un jours of
Pétis de la Croix published in Paris
(1710-1712). Turandot already lived in Persian
Literature, from the 12th
century's great poet
Nezami. It might not be only a coincidence that Puccini died before
composing the music for the happy ending of
Turandot, after having written the music for the
funeral of Liù, the rival princess of Turandot, who
died of love.
Cordelia's
words bear witness to a human reality which does not
belong to the phallic order, which can exist but
cannot be publicly expounded. When Cordelia speaks,
together with King Lear there are his dignitaries and
the noble suitors of his daughters. If the father-king
should accept Cordelia's speech, the phallic axis
would crack. The king, who represents this axis, must
eliminate his youngest daughter, because she has born
witness to a reality that no rule can master: the
incommensurability of affections.
We are now ready to answer our pending
question, about the second disgusting skin with which
Rot-Eyes - like all the Donkey Skin type protagonists -
hides herself, isolating her from male desire. We can
understand why the delegitimation that Rot-Eyes
undergoes does not turn into a fatal sentence - as
happens in the medieval legend of King Leir, in
Shakespeare's tragedy and in so many melodramas, as well
as in so many other examples that we could remember.
Fairy tales stage a time and a movement of the main
female actant from which male actants are excluded. In
this time maternal actants come to help the main actant,
and their actions mean recognition between mother and
daughter, between old and young women. These actions are
deceptively small and simple, but we can understand them
thanks to their symbolic meaning. Rot-Eyes and the
Donkey Skins work out the loss of their mother - dead,
or not even mentioned in this kind of tale. When they
find other mother helper actants, they can restore their
mother figure, and become autonomous subjects. Only
after this veiled mother/daughter acknowledgement their
beauty can shine, and the happy ending comes, with the
young prince who sees it. However, one must not take for
granted the fairy tales' happy ending, which solves the
node of the beginning, allowing the new generation to
live and give new life.
For the error bred in the bone Of each woman and each man Craves what it cannot have, Not universal love But to be loved alone
All
knots are thus definitively loosened, and life - with
its succession between the different generations -
flows freely while Rot-Eyes recounts her whole story
to the prince. He summons his royal parents and
obtains their approval to marry the beauty he has
uncovered.
Let
us sum up the path of the female subject, the
fairy-tales' main actant, she who acts and defines
herself through this subjectivation. The taking away of paternal legitimation is
followed by a journey during which the subject is
formed, and must therefore hide, render her beauty
invisible. Taken in in a foreign palace, Rot-Eyes is a
servant, she sews and spins, like the various Donkey
Skins rear barnyard animals and cook. But nothing really
changes as long as male desire isn't activated, be this
when the prince falls sick with love and wishes for the
penhouse guardian or the she-bear to cook for him, or
that, taken by curiosity, he investigates, and finds out
the true nature of the lively old woman he brought back
to his palace.
The
first step for Rot.-Eyes towards becoming an
autonomous subject is the end of her father's
legitimization. The second step is the maternal
acknowledgement, which happens far from any male
sight. If the main actant's mother is absent at the
beginning, this means that the mother has been
eliminated, i.e. that the relation of acknowledgement
between mother and daughter has not taken place. In
classical terms, the elimination of the mother follows
from the incestuous desire of the daughter to take her
mother's place, a place which will however become a
cage when she grows up. In
a fairy tale, as in a dream, there are no guilty or
innocent subjects, nor righteous and unrighteous ones.
There are characters which, at some more universal
level, embody as many states and ways of being. The
fairy tale allows us to experience emotions, feeling,
fears to which they provide a character, a gesture, a
negative or positive magical event.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
She-Bear Castle of the Forced Love Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The She-Bear starts with the same royal promise to a dying queen that we find in every version of Donkey Skin, and continues with the royal daughter, Preziosa, who is the only one fitting the requirement. Mother and daughter are not separated until they look at each other as if into a mirror. If this king could marry his daughter, becoming her father and husband, he would crystallize himself and stop his progeny. But the young actant shirks this deadly grip and conceals her beauty by turning into a she-bear, scaring her father to death. Then she flees into the woods, where a young king finds her while hunting. Intrigued in the bear, who looks so tame, he leads her into his royal garden. When Preziosa thinks that no one can see her, she removes from her mouth a little magic stick, and turns into her real beautiful shape, to comb her hair. The king sees her, but since she quickly turns again into a bear, he falls sick with love. Then he calls the bear beside his bed, and kissing her furry muzzle he removes her magic stick. The king, now healed, happily marries Preziosa, who is now free of her fierce bear-shape. The queen, mother of the love-sick prince, is a mediator, and we find the same character in each version of this tale. She unwillingly asks the bear to prepare food and take care of her royal son, even if she is terrified thinking that the animal could mawl the young prince. The prince asks the she-bear to kiss him, and she does so only when the queen says, kiss him, my dear fine animal, kiss him or he will die!. Thanks to a magic stick in her mouth the princess could turn into a bear, and could turn back into a beautiful girl by spitting it out. Kissing her, the prince takes the stick into his own mouth, so that he now holds in his arms his beloved princess, who will not turn into a bear. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
King of Spinningwheel Castle of the Forced Love Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We find ourselves in a hen-house, which turns into a room as beautiful as paradise when some fairies enter it at night together with a prince they hold prisoner. A few days earlier, his secret bride had knocked at the door of the Re d'Anìmmulu, asking for the charity of a shelter. Giving her the hen-house, the queen did not know who she was, or that she would give birth to the son of her own only son, who had been kidnapped and never found. And Nunzia, the beggar, did not answer her questions:
The queen does not know Nunzia's secret, and Nunzia does not reveal it. This Sicilian fairy tale has in its title the key to understanding it. The Sicilian word Anìmmulu means spinning wheel. It tells of a king who owes his name to an instrument linked to spinning, which is the feminine activity of the Moirai of Greek mythology, the Parcae of the Romans, the Norns of the ancient Germans, who set the boundaries of life and death for human beings. The king whose name is the fairy-tales' title comes on the stage only with the edict issued at the end of the story, breaking the enchantment that keeps his son far from the human world.
The King of Spinningwheel acts only when his queen tells him how their lost son can return from the world of the fairies who kidnapped him. The queen had learned this from Nunzia, whom she had asked to question the prince about this, and the prince in turn had learned this from the fairies. This King of Spinningwheel understands the female world, onto which he does not try to impose his law, unlike the father-kings of Sleeping Beauty, Brier Rose, and Talia, who try to neutralize the ill fate of their daughters by banishing all spinning instruments and activities from their realm. We are speaking of a fairy tale full of secrets, in which only one actant, the sister of Nunzia, violates a secret, being quite unaware of its reason and consequences. Let us now resume this fairy tale from its beginning, a type of fairy tale we missed, with its poetic and narrative summit in a poignant lullaby like the one we quoted above. It begins with poverty: we find a cobbler humiliated by his wife because he is not able to earn enough to feed her and their three daughters. Then the man, together with his youngest daughter, goes and looks for wild herbs to make a soup at least. When Nunzia, the main female actant of our tale, finds a fennel so big that she is not able to pull it out, the father goes to help her. They pull it out, and under the big herb they see a trapdoor. Our prince, whose identity is kept secret until the baby is born, offers the cobbler enough money to make him rich, asking for Nunzia in exchange. After some hesitation, the man agrees, and Nunzia goes down through the trap door into a beautiful palace, shining like the hen-house where we entered when the fairies were dancing and playing music and the prince sung his lullaby. Nunzia lives there with the young prince, but everyday weeps thinking of her father. So, this fairy tales begins with a love bond between a father and a daughter, who rescues from poverty - from death in other fairy tales of this type - her father, thanks to her sacrifice. It is a voluntary sacrifice in Beauty and the Beast, while here the father gives his youngest daughter to the underground groom in exchange for a large sum of money. We placed this type of fairy tales, where the main female actant splits off from her father in the northwest quadrant, and their injunction is the Castle of the Forced Love. But in our fairy tale there is also the King of Spinningwheel, a second paternal actant, who is the polar opposite of Nunzia's father, not only for his royal status, but also for the attitude that qualifies him since his same name. He takes into account the female world, which he meets through his edict, after having known the fairies' norms, different from the male world as is day from night. There's another difference that we would like to underline between the main male actant of our fairy tale and his correspondent protagonist in the type Beauty and the Beast, the variants of which to varying degrees descend from the aniles fabella of Apuleius, Love and Psyche (see Amor et Psyche, Fabella, in the website Adalinda Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole). The prince of Spinningwheel is a prisoner of the fairies, and they order him to turn his secret bride out of their underground palace. It happens when Nunzia's sister - and not Nunzia herself - who is sleeping, violates the prohibition to open the forbidden room.
The motif of the ball of yarn to follow and find one's road is also found in a Russian fairy tale. An old woman gives this present to the female main actant who is looking for her lost secret groom: "Then she brought out a ball of yarn, sent it rolling along the road and told the maid to follow it. The maid thanked her and set off after the ball of yarn." (Alexandr N. Afanasjev, 1855). This is one of the most poetical objects to find one's way in fairy tales, which is what the main actants have to do. After some times, undetermined as is any time of transformation, Nunzia stops at the end of the yarn, and she finds herself before the palace of the King of Spinningwheel. The queen is the female helper actant, because she gives Nunzia shelter, she listens to the sounds and songs coming from the hen-house during the night, she convinces Nunzia to reveal who her parents are and who is her groom and her baby's father. Nonetheless, this queen was a positive character also before knowing that the newborn baby is her son' son and that the girl can give her back the prince:
The prince comes for the second time together with the fairies, and Nunzia asks him how to break the spell. The King then issues an edict to accomplish those conditions. The King of Spinningwheel deserves a special attention: since it is necessary that the fairies do not realize that the night is over he orders that no bell or watch ring and all cocks be killed. The cock is the announcer of daybreak, symbolizing the light winning over darkness. For this reason windvanes on roofs often have the form of a cock, to protect from darkness the houses and their inhabitants, so that light may overcome darkness, alternating with it, like the sun alternates with the moon. Apart from the king's edict, a feminine work is needed, namely a blue canvas embroidered with the moon and the stars, to screen the window and conceal the new daylight. The feminine art of spinning gives life and death in the ancient myth of the three Parcae, relentless goddesses of fate. Now the embroidery works to break the spell. But the fairies too do feminine works: in the forbidden room opened by Nunzia's sister during her only visit to the underground palace, they were sewing and embroidering clothes and linen for the baby that Nunzia was expecting. As soon as the door opens, the fairies turn into snakes and lizards and disappear. The third night, when the prince of Spinningwheel comes to rock and sing the lullaby to his baby, the fairies play and dance. Like the previous nights, they often look at the window to see if the new day is coming:
They go on dancing and singing until the sun is at its zenith, when, following the prince's instructions, the blue embroidered canvas is removed. The daylight surprises the fairies, who, turning some into snakes, others into lizards, disappear. Three generations can now live together happily ever after. The fairy tale's horizon, which was quite human at the beginning, turns human again at the end, and this is what happens in all fairy tales. The happy ending entails the end of magic, but to get it you must understand the value of a ball of yarn leading you where you have to go and of a trap door under a huge fennel. Daily objects like nuts and almonds, lamps and little shoes, assume in fairy tales virtues that amazingly transcend their daily value. Dreamtime is necessary, if it is bordered by the time of reality. Nonetheless, if you, having read the tale of the King of Spinningwheel, are walking through a field or a forest and see a darting lizard or a snake, you might smile, thinking that it could be one of the domineering fairies, embroiderers and dancers, whose beauty faded by the sudden daylight. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Frog Prince Castle of the Forced Love Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The tale belongs to the northeast quadrant, since the princess, who is the main female actant, has a father-king who loves her very much. He has given her a golden ball, which has become her favourite toy. The princess loses the golden ball in a deep fountain and gets it back from a frog, in exchange for the princess' promising that she will fullfill his wishes. The relationship between father and daughter is so close that the maiden keeps her promise only when her father imposes it on her. This tale’s injunction is therefore the Castle of the Forced Love. The Princess and the Frog is also an animated film based on this fairy tale (Ron Clements and John Musker, US 2009). It is set in New Orleans in the twenties, and it tells the story of Tiana, a girl who shares her father’s dream to open a restaurant, and fulfils her dream after many sacrifices. Tiana’s family is not royal and this detail is the heart of the whole narration; she goes to a ball to meet a financial backer for her project, and she wears a regal gown lent by a friend of hers. In addition, Prince Naveen, who was turned into a frog by witchcraft, comes to the ball, and since he believes Tiana to be a princess, asks her to kiss him. But Tiana is not a princess, and instead of turning back the frog into a prince, she turns into a frog too. So, the adventure of the two little frogs, looking for a way to become human again, begins. Within this adventure they grow up helping each other; and they fall in love with each other. This reciprocity, usually implicit in folktales, in this contemporary fairy-tale storytelling is developed to become the heart of the story. To mention only a few examples we remember, among animated films, Tangled (Nathan Greno and Byron Howard, US 2010) and Frozen (Chris Buck and Jennifer Lee, US 2013), and among TV series, Beauty & the Beast (Sherri Cooper-Landsman and Jennifer Levin, US 2012-in production) and Once upon a time (Adam Horowitz and Edward Kitsis, US 2011-in production). Among live action films we remember Cinderella (Kenneth Branagh, US 2015), Jack the Giant Slayer (Bryan Singer, US 2013) and Snow White & the Huntsman (Rupert Sanders, US 2012). These
stories stress the importance of the meeting between
equals to find a way to face one’s own injunctions, to
change, and grow up. Nevertheless, they do not only
need to meet each other, because the
value of a meeting comes from their helpfulness, their
willingness to listen to others, to recognize their
qualities, to imagine and see new perspectives. They
free themselves from their curse or their duress,
helping whoever they meet to get back their own
freedom and to find theirs. Italo
Calvino wrote that fairy-tale actants free
themselves by freeing other actants (Italian
Folktales, English Translation 1980, Introduction,
p. XIX). This fair ethics of fairness is a core
element of today’s fairy tales told by cinema and TV,
and it always belonged to popular and cultured fairy
tales alike. The Princess and the Frog pivots
on this ethics, and Mama Odie, a friendly voodoo
witch, expresses this truth when she explains to the
two little frogs that they can turn themselves back
into human beings only together. After many
adventures, the two frogs get the chance to turn back
into human beings, but Navee should receive a kiss
from a princess and he refuses to, because he only
wants to be kissed by his little frog. Then Tiana
prefers to be an animal together with her beloved,
rather than turning back into a woman without him. So
they choose to remain frogs to be together, and after
this choice they get an unexpected happy ending. See also the movie, the e-kamishibai
and the history of
this fairy tale (The Frog tells his History),
available via its fairy
tale map. (CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Tacconelle of Woody Maria Castle of the Forced Love Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Tacconelle of Woody Maria, a dialectal fairy tale from Molise, is a folk version of Donkey Skin. Maria, the main actant of this folk tale, flees far from her incestuous father covered in legno, wood. This wood cover belongs to the same trope of the donkey skin, the animal shape of The She-Bear, and the skin of the hundred-year old dead woman, which hides the fifteen-year-old girl of Rot-Eyes. The only interpretation we see for this wood disguise is the wood of the coffin, which refers to the mourning experience of all these beauties within the time they have to spend between their flight from their incestuous father and their recognition by the foreign prince who falls in love with them. Woody Maria finds asylum in a foreign kingdom where she attends to the chickens. Here she lives in the henhouse, among filth, poos, and lice. So, Maria gains experience of the wretched time of mourning, a time which one needs to live through in order to overcome a loss. Here this loss is that of her ideal of herself, depending on her idealised love of and for her father. She undergoes the contempt of the prince, because he mocks her every morning when she brings him the fresh eggs. He tells her about the ball he is going to, and when Maria asks to go with him, he taunts her and throws something against her. Then Maria goes to the ball, so well cleaned and dressed that the prince falls in love with the unknown beauty and gets sick with love. When he eventually guesses that his beloved could be the despised guardian of the henhouse, he sends his mother to ask Maria to knead and cook for him a plate of tacconelle, and the queen accepts. Maria hides beneath the tacconelle a decisive sign of recognition for the Prince. The mother queen’s mediating role is necessary in these fairy tales (see also Donkey Skin and The She-Bear). Let us point out that the mother queen gives here room to a strange character to take care of her regal son and feed him, even if it is a bear or a servant, a filthy girl living in the henhouse, or an unknown girl covered by a donkey skin. She gives up her maternal prerogatives to save her royal son, accepting to be able any more to meet his needs and his desires. Namely, this mother queen - a precious example but one that is hard to follow - understands that her son has grown up and leaves her dominant position. Many other maternal actants do the opposite - for example the mother queen of The Enchanted Doe. With regard to the almost countless mothers of main female actants unable to leave their dominant position, see all the fairy tales depending on the injunctions Peak of the Impossible Task, Gibbet of the Death Sentence, Tower of the Segregation, and Forest of the Exile that are located in the southwest quadrant or our Fairy Map of Succession. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Donkey
Skin Castle of the Forced Love Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Donkey Skin
by Charles Perrault is the most popular version of this
type of fairy tale. The oldest version ever published is Doralice by Giovan
Francesco Straparola, followed by the version of
Giambattista Basile, The She-Bear,
and from this version onwards this story has its settled
features. The princess, the future Donkey Skin, is desperate because her father wants to marry her, and she turns to her fairy godmother who advises her to require he fulfill a set of conditions. First the father-king must provide her with a dress the colour of air, and then with another one the colour of the sun. But he must also give her the skin of the donkey who lives in the royal stables and evacuates gold sequins. Since the father is able to meet all her demands, the princess is left with nothing else to do but flee, hiding her beauty under the donkey skin, which is as disgusting as her dresses are wonderful. The two dresses represent her father’s love and recognition for her ideal beauty. The donkey skin and the servile condition she experiences at a foreign court represent the opposite of the ideal perfection, and its painful fall. While people find her repellent, she regains her beauty when she is alone. Among her turkeys and sheep she wears her wonderful dresses, which magically had accompanied her in an underground casket. One day the prince happens to see her through the keyhole, and understands that the elegant beautiful girl is the same servant covered with the donkey skin. But he can encounter his beloved beauty only when he is ready to encounter the dirty servant covered with the animal skin. Without the help of the old queen, mother of the main male actant, the encounter between her son and the disguised beauty would not be possible. We find this motif in each version of this type - see The Tacconelle of Woody Maria and The She-Bear. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Raven Fortress of Solitude Northeast quadrant The White Ricotta Fortress of Solitude Northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The main male
actant is a king who lives with his younger brother, the
prince. There are no parents, and The Raven
does not mention any. The injunction of these fairy
tales is the Fortress of
Solitude also because of the isolation of
the two brothers, so close to each other that the
younger one acts only following his elder brother’s
wish. The lack of the father and of the heirs, together
with the hard and dangerous search for an ideal wife,
may represent a main actant who prefers his solitude to
the flow of generations. When a fairy tale tells of a
prince shunning marriage, there is a father-king who
begs him to marry (see also: The
Three Citrons). In these two tales,
the king is about to sacrifice his brother and his
newborn babies, risking a tragic conclusion instead of a
happy ending. Considering the predominance of male
actants, we put these tales in the Northeast
Quadrant. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Three Citrons Fortress of Solitude Northeast quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You find to the northeast, in the Fortress of Solitude, the fairy tale The Three Citrons, which has been retold several times, represented and set to music. There is a prince who does not wish to marry, leaving his realm in danger because of the lack of heirs. But one day, cutting a ricotta, the prince cuts his finger. Looking at the red of his blood together with the white of the ricotta, he imagines a girl with those colours. He immediately falls in love with this ideal, like the main male actants of The Raven and the The White Ricotta, and he leaves his kingdom to look for her over sea and mountains. It is told that he finally reached the Islands of the three Ogresses, where the oldest one gave him three citrons and a knife, warning him to open them only when he returned to his realm. The Ogress also told him to be ready and quench the thirst of the beautiful girl coming forth from the citron, otherwise she would fade. So he did, but having been unable to give water to the first and the second beautiful girl, they disappeared. When the third beautiful creature appeared he was in time to quench her thirst, and he got the bride he was in love with, as white - as Basile tells - as milk, a ricotta, and a giuncata, and as red as his blood. Then he said to her to wait for him hidden on a tree, so that he could go to his palace and take clothes worthy of her, and come back with a royal cortège to lead her to his palace as his bride. But a black slave came to the fountain to draw water for her mistress, and she saw the beautiful girl's image in the water. Thinking that the image was her own, she broke her jug, because, being so beautiful, she was sure to deserve a better condition than being a servant. The beautiful girl burst out laughing at that scene, and the slave discovered her. When the ingenuous girl told the slave why she was up there and whom she was waiting for, the slave climbed up pretending to comb her, but she pierced the girl's head with a big pin. The maiden barely had time to cry "Palomma! Palomma!" (Dove, dove!) and turning into a dove she flew away. When the prince came back with the cortège he was dumbfounded, but the slave said that she was the same maiden he had left on the tree. She explained that the reason of her change was that her colour was white for one year, black for another, and the prince had to marry her. The royal parents of the prince thought that their son could have spared such a long journey to find that kind of bride, nevertheless, they abdicated and the young couple came to the throne. But a dove flew thrice into the kitchen where they were preparing the sumptuous wedding banquet, asking the cook:
The cook went to inform their Majesties about that strange matter, and the black queen ordered him to pull the neck of the dove and boil it. So did the cook, and he threw the cooking water from the window. A citron tree quickly grew up, and its branches reached the window of the king's room. He began to investigate this amazing tree, and calling the cook he learned of the dove and ordered that nobody touch the citron. When he saw three fruits hanging from the three, he took the knife received from the Ogress, and everything happened like the first time. The first and the second beautiful girls disappeared, but he was able to quench in time the thirst of the third maiden and he held back his true bride in his arms. The slave was forced to confess her deceit and was sentenced to death, and the king eventually married the beautiful maiden. This is the 49th fairy tale of Basile's collection, telling the deceit of an ugly slave against a beautiful maiden. It is the same deceit perpetrated by the black usurper bride sitting near the king Taddeo in the frame story of the collection. The last but one fairy tale partly coincides with the tale of tales, namely the story of The Princess of Hairy Valley, who, by a magic spinning doll, arouses in her rival the need to listen to stories. This fascinating narrative device is a particular form of frame story, in which a character - the princess of Hairy Valley - does not only determine the need to hear and tell stories: she comes out from the frame to tell the last part of her own story, whose first part is the beginning of the collection itself. Its ending happens in the frame, closing it both as ending of the frame fairy tale and of the fifty fairy tales that the frame story led to tell. The work looks like a mise en abyme of the interweaving between concrete and fantastic events, between lie and truth, between story and history. This makes Basile's masterpiece unequalled, because this ingenious and complex frame corresponds in every fairy tale to a game of different ways, where the comedian is mixed with the lyrical, and consuming love with scatological details, like in the story of The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket. We already quoted the first war effort of the cockroach, who is a virtuoso musician. Together with the other little animals of Nardiello, he fights against the groom who spends his first night with the princess, taking the place belonging to their master.
Fairy tale after fairy tale, like in the frame story, Basile invites you to believe and not to believe, to keep your eyes open and to dream, to see three wonderful girls coming from the cut of three citrons and fading when they do not quench their thirst in time. For an interpretation of this story, see what we wrote about The Raven and The White Ricotta. Here we simply wish to note that The Three Citrons begins with the narcissistic retreat of the male main actant, who refuses marriage. When he sees a new reflection of himself, as red as his blood, as white as ricotta, he leaves his fortress, falls in love with an ideal maiden, and sets off. He gets her through three magic citrons, but this is not enough to get a happy ending, namely the fully human horizon that characterizes the fairy tale genre as a whole just like the beginning of each tale. An opposite of the ideal beauty - here and in the frame story it is the Saracen black slave - has to come onto the stage. Then both the main actants have to fight to fulfill their desire. Before leaving The three Citrons - in our e-book we give in the appendix a version in the language of the Albanian alloglot community of Sicily - we have to remember Carlo Gozzi, who adapted this fairy tale for his play The Love for the Three Oranges (first performed in Venice, 1761). Basile's misogynistic prince becomes a prince sick with melancholy due to his passion for tragedies. His opponents think of killing him by reciting another tragic poem. From The Princess of Hairy Valley Carlo Gozzi takes the motif of the oil fountain to make the sad prince finally laugh. An enemy of the prince, the fairy Morgana, disguised as an old woman, falls over on her back and displays the same show of the old woman in the frame story, which is the same displayed by the old Baubo to the goddess Demeter. Like the princess of Hairy Valley and the great Greek goddess, the prince bursts out laughing and heals from melancholy. Like that princess he then sets off to find his beloved who comes from the third citron/orange. The antagonist Morgana then turns her into a rat, but also this spell is then dissolved, and the prince marries the beautiful girl. (The full text of L'amore delle tre melarance is available at http://www.classicitaliani.it/goldoni/gozzi01.htm, accessed 31/08/16). Sergej Prokof'ev - adapting Carlo Gozzi's play - wrote the libretto and music of his opera The Love for the Three Oranges (Любовь к трём апельсинам, Ljubov k trëm apel'sinam) in 1919. Its first performance was staged in Chicago, 1921. (available online, Opera North, dir. Richard Jones, Leed 1989; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPGPP773zFY, accessed 31/08/16). Prokof'ev also composed Op. 33bis, a suite in six movements with the same title. (The 1988 production by Richard Jones for Opera North, later seen at the English National Opera, the New York City Opera and elsewhere, is available online, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8TCEJy6P0g, accessed 31/08/16) Let us end this note with two alternating rhyming octaves, from the Prologue of The Love of the Three Oranges. Here Carlo Gozzi contended with his contemporary Venetian playwright, who oppressed his audiences with serious and tragic works:
About origins, meanings and consequences of the colour white (like snow, marble, milk and cheese) together with red (blood) and sometimes black (like feathers of a raven or mahogany) see a Comparazione (comparison) of the following fairy tales: The Princess of Hairy Valley, frame story of The Tale of Tales, The Raven (The Tale of Tales); The Three Citrons (The Tale of Tales); Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs; La culumbena bianca, folktale collected in Romagna; La fola di Bianca come neve rossa come sangue, folktale collected in Emilia; website 'Adalinda Gasparini Psicoanalisi e favole'. (AG)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Princess of Hairy Valley Fortress of Solitude Northwest quadrant |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This fairy tale is the frame-story of Giambattista Basile' Tale of Tales, namely the first collection of fairy tales ever published. It is the story of a princess, Zoza, who had never laughed. Her father, hoping to cure this melancholy, had summoned to his court all sorts of jugglers, actors and acrobats. But Zoza had never shown even half a smile. Eventually the King built a fountain of oil in the square in front of the Palace, and all those who came there to draw oil would slip in such comical ways that the whole court heartily laughed. But not Zoza. One day an old woman arrived, and walking slowly she went to the oil fountain and filled her jug without losing balance. But when she was about to leave, a page hit her pot with a slingshot and broke it. The old woman hurled insults at him, and the page replied in kind:
Melancholy is a state of mind of permanent mourning, which excludes the satisfaction of any desire, or, rather, the very possibility of desiring anything. Thinking of Greek mythology, we remember the mourning of Demeter, goddess of harvest. When Hades, god of the underworld, abducted her daughter Kore, Demeter went looking for her, but could not find her beloved daughter anywhere. Her desperation was so great that she prevented the Earth from giving harvest, and mankind was on the brink of starvation. When the wandering Demeter arrived in Eleusis, Baubò, mythical wife of the king, offered her a barley drink, which the goddess refused. At this refusal the old queen reacted by raising her dress and showing her genitals. Demeter then laughed, putting an end to her grief, then she taught men the art of agriculture. The old happy time, when the earth spontaneusly gave harvest, was over. Now Kore was not only the daughter of Demeter, but also the wife of Hades, god of the underworld. Kore had to live underground for half a year, and on the earth, with her mother, for the other six monthes. The cold bad season corresponds to the monthes in which Kore is underground: in the other six monthes, when the daughter is with her mother, when the goddesses are again united, the earth is blooming and bearing fruit and harvest. Let us eventually note that the gesture of the old woman does not recall only the mythical gesture of Baubò: the woody set refers to the female sex and to the locus amenus of Arcadian poetry, with a comic effect that ridicules the mannerism of pastoral poetry, a genre very popular in Basile's time. In the fairy tales in which there is a princess who never laughs, the time of her first laughter which puts an end to her melancholy is also the time of her wedding (see also, for example, The Cockroach, the Mouse and the Cricket). In the Greek myth, the earth spontaneously giving plentiful harvest corresponds to the dyad mother/daughter of Demeter and Kore before their first separation. Mourning, as we said, corresponds to the time when the earth does not provide a harvest any more, while the end of this fatal mourning, after the laughter of the mother goddess, opens the time when the earth gives fruit thanks to human work. This is our human time, when spring and summer, rich in flowers and harvest, alternate with cold seasons without fruits. In the dyad of the mother and the daughter there is no succession, which implies a painful separation. Melancholy, the ancient name of modern depression, follows the violent break of this perfect dyad. A lost perfection, which being only imagined cannot be renounced, is at the heart of melancholy. The view of old Baubo's sex provokes the laughter of the great goddess Demeter - whose prerogatives coincide with those of Mother Earth. In the same way the old woman shows her sex to spite the insolent pageboy and provokes Zoza's laughter. Let us notice the name of the princess' kingdom, Hairy Valley, referring just to what the old characters show putting an end to the melancholy of the ancient goddess as well as of the princess of the Tale of Tales frame-story. As we said, Kore was abducted by Hades, god of the Underworld, kingdom of the dead. The princess of Hairy Valley also has to face death, since the old woman cast a spell on her: She will marry the handsome prince Taddeo, but he, because of a black curse, is lying as if dead under a tombstone. There it is written that only she who fills with her tears the large pitcher which is hanging there will bring him back to life and be his wife. She has to fill that pitcher with her tears in three days. Zoza leaves her father's palace and she walks for seven years looking for Taddeo's grave. During her journey she meets, one after another, three fairies, who ask her where she is going, and she tells them her story. Each of them gives her three magic fruits, a nut, a chestnut, and a hazelnut, ordering her to open them only when she is in need, having no other resources. (The number seven recurs in Il Re porco; available on line, Psicoanalisi e favole. The female main actant sets off to find her lost husband, and her impossible task is to wear down seven pairs of iron shoes, seven iron clubs, seven iron dresses, and fill seven flasks with her tears.) After seven years Zoza arrives to the grave of prince Taddeo and in three days she nearly fills the pitcher with her tears. But when only a few tears are missing, she, exhausted, falls asleep. An ugly black slave woman, coming over there, takes the jug from Zoza's hands, pours there the few missing tears and awakens the prince. Thinking that she carried out the feat, Taddeo marries the black slave. In the meantime the poor Zoza wakes up and discovers what has happened. But without becoming discouraged Zoza goes to live in a palace opposite that of the prince, and breaking one after another the nut and the chestnut she gets two wonderful gallantries. When the usurper bride sees these amazing objects, she wants to have them (also for the gallantries, see the above quoted fairy tale Il Re porco). Taddeo offers Zoza a large sum, but his unknown liberator sends them to him as a gift. When eventually Zoza opens the hazelnut, a gold-spinning doll appears, and she puts the third gallantry on the windowsill. Like the other two times, the black slave wants it for herself. Before giving it to Taddeo, who now comes in person to ask for the amazing doll, Zoza endows the doll with a spell: the third gallantry will inspire in her rival an irresistible urge to listen to fairy tales. And here, to satisfy this new craving of his bride - who is pregnant and threatens to punch to her belly if she does not get what she wants - Taddeo summons to his court ten women storytellers. They will stay at court for five days, and each of them will have to tell a fairy tale every day. So, the frame story of Basile opens his collection, and now, day by day, Taddeo, the usurper wife - and us too, together with them - listen to forty-nine fairy tales. We give in Fabulando fourteen of these stories, with Basile's Neapolitan text and, page to page, an English translation. You can not fully enjoy the value of these fairy tales if you cannot access the original text of Basile, because his style shapes them as well as their content. The Neapolitan title of this collection, Lo cunto de li cunti, is usually translated in English with The Tale of Tales, (in Italian: Il racconto dei racconti) but it would be more correct to translate it as The Fairy Tale of Fairy Tales (Italian: La fiaba delle fiabe or La favola delle favole), because the book belongs to this genre. Moreover, Basile's baroque masterpiece sets up this genre, being the first collection of fairy tales published in the world. It reworks many pre-existent narrative motifs, both literary and popular, and gives motifs and plots to numberless following collections of fairy tales, which restyled them to varying degrees in Italy and in Europe, since their 17th century publication to date. The Three Citrons is the 49th fairy tale of the collection - namely the ninth of the fifth and last day. The main actant is a prince who did not want to get married, and the story tells how an ugly black slave takes the place of the beautiful magic creature whom the prince had conquered and was going to marry. At the end of the fairy tale, when the usurper queen hears her own history, she is worried, but keeps silent. And here, Zoza leaves the frame and comes onto the stage, and the fairy tale of fairy tales, her own story, becomes the 50th and last fairy tale of the collection. Now the ugly slave tries to stop her, threatening to punch her stomach and kill the child of the king who is about to be born. But this time Taddeo does not listen to her. So, Zoza tells what we already know from the beginning of the collection, revealing to the king that she, a princess who was sick with melancholy, revived him. To save him she had walked and walked for seven years and filled with tears the jug in three days. King Taddeo meets again his true bride, and sentences to death the usurper slave. Thus ends the fairy tale of the princess of Hairy Valley after forty-nine fairy tales, when she tells her story as the fiftieth fairy tale. It is both frame story and part of the great fresco of Giambattista Basile, the Neapolitan genius who arranged the literary genre of fairy tales. We owe him this acknowledgement, as well as we owe Giovanni Boccaccio the foundation of the short story - or novella - as a literary genre. We cannot avoid a last notation on the death to which Taddeo sentences, without any hesitation, his usurper queen and their child who is about to be born. This detail is out of our sensibility, moreover it is an apax, recurring only this time in the whole collection, and in fairy tales - as far as we know - nobody sentences to death an unborn baby. Let's notice that, before the end of the 49th fairy tale, king Taddeo gives in to all the cravings of the usurper queen when she threatens to punch her stomach and harm the baby prince who is about to be born. Only when the truth emerges through the last part of the fairy tale of the fairy tales the usurper queen's threat becomes vain. To understand what this total disregard by Taddeo for his future descendant means, we have to go beyond its manifest content. It can mean that the power of the fairy tale of the fairy tales - namely the story of his awakening from death - overcomes the king's care for the unborn prince. To meet his beloved bride overcomes the need to secure an heir for his and his father's throne. Nevertheless, if something remains inconsistent or difficult to accept, you can think that it happens in fairy tales as it does in life. This does not diminish the taste of life and of storytelling. Thus spoke Taddeo before the ten story-tellers began to tell fairy tales:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.
Storytelling and...
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.1 Storytelling and Fairy Tales | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairy tale is a loan translation of the
French conte de fees, dating from the early 18th
century. French and English both have a name for the kind
of stories that were first printed in Italy (The
Facetious Nights by Giovan
Francesco Straparola; Venice: 1550-51). The first
European collection of fairy tales, Tale of Tales by
Giambattista
Basile, is also Italian (published in Naples,
1634-36). In Italian the word fiaba has been used only since the mid-nineteenth century, to define the narrative genre corresponding to the French conte de fée and the English fairy tale. Conte de feés was the name given by Madame d'Aulnoy in 1698 for her collection, translated into English in 1699. Nevertheless, the Italian favola is still used by non-scholars and children as a synonym of fiaba, and fiabe are still called as novelle, storie (stories) and racconti (tales). The Tale of Tales, Il Racconto dei Racconti, is the title of a film by Matteo Garrone based on the collection by Basile, Lo cunto de li cunti (Italy-France 2015; see also The Enchanted Doe). François Noël, writing his encyclopaedia of myths during the French revolution, used the word fables for myths (Dictionnaire de la fable, ou mythologie). The Italian translators of his work similarly used the word favola (Dizionario della favola o mitologia). (See the Fabulando e-book Definizioni/Definitions. Fabula, favola, fiaba, fable, fiaba, fairy tale, story, pp. 32-33) The definition of the word fiaba corresponds to conte de fées and fairy tale, and we can say that the Sixty-seven e-books collected in Fabulando are fiabe, contes de fees, fairy tales (see Fabulando's map Words for Fairy Tale across Europe; see also the e-book Definizioni/Definitions. Fabula, favola, fairy tale, pp. 27-29) With regard to the French and English name of this kind of storytelling, given that fairies appear only in twelve tales out of Fabulando's Sixty-seven, let us point out that the words conte de fees and fairy-tale name a set of stories in virtue of specific magic female actants who are actually absent from the overwhelming majority of them. The Italian word fiaba, one of the direct descendants of the Latin fabula, names however the same genre. Fiaba has an older etymology than the expression conte de fées and fairy tales, and from its ancient root descend many correpondant terms in other European languages. The French expression was coined in France at the time of the Sun King, when Charles Perrault and other noble ladies told Les contes de ma mère l’Oye and other collections, which in the early 18th century gave life to Le Cabinet des Fées (The Fairies' Cabinet). The Italian word fiaba corresponds to conte de fées and fairy tale, while favola names the apologue, just as the English and French fable; nevertheless, as we said, favola and fairy tale are still synonyms in common speech. If Italian children ask for a fiaba or a favola to go to sleep, they mean and get the same kind of story, a fairy tale. The word favola names a wide set of tales that does not lose its general meaning when we classify a particular kind of favole (fiabe, fairy tales). The undefinable borders among fiaba, mito and favola, as well as their various senses, give evidence of this genre’s complexity, which, displaying a supreme neutrality facing the scholar’s classifications, makes plausible and even convincing each interpretation and grading. Fairy tales are helpful to each interpretation and grading, nevertheless they leave with an egg on their faces the scholars as soon as they think to keep them in their cage. The Latin word fabula, whose field of signification corresponds to the ancient Greek μύθος (mýthos), includes almost any kind of tale, except for religious, scientific and historical ones. These three kinds of narratives are not fabulae because they form true narrations. A true narration is the description of the true reality - the one belonging to a culture in a historical period. From this point of view, whose truthfulness is commonly shared, many narrations migrate to join the fabulae, whose set is always more wide and inclusive than the non-fabulae set. A good example is given by the tragic luck of the fabula or myth of race, scientifically false, but good to give an effective support to shaky identities (see also, about this, Storytelling and History). It is something fake told and believed as true. The results of a fabula or myth propagandized as absolute truth are firstly bracing, finally tragic, for peoples as well for individual subjects. Let's think of the Latin word fabula (as well as of the Italian favola, in its old and popular wide meaning) in terms of a fractal. This means that if we extrapolate a word from its source to name a part of the whole set (like fairy tale or fable) it goes on meaning both something true, possible and desirable, together with something false, deplorable and to be rejected. It keeps on going with the same feature as its matrix, meaning both something true, possible and desirable, and something false, deplorable and to be rejected. In every Italian dictionary, be it ancient or modern, we can see that favola, fairy tale and myth mean something true as well as something false. In Italian everyday language, mitico! (mythic!) and favoloso! (fabulous!) connote something very amazing and enjoyable, as well as non è altro che una favola, non è altro che un mito (it is nothing but a fable, it is nothing but a myth) connotes something disappointing that has lost any charm revealing its falseness, together with its lack of grip on reality. In Italian, the word fiaba names the fairy-tale only beginning from the mid-nineteenth century, 150 years after French and English. Let us now try to understand the meaning of this delay, keeping in mind that the Italian editions of fairy tales has been the first published in the world, within a collection of novellas. Also published in Italy for the first time has been a collection of fairy tales. The presence of many interchangeable words naming many kinds of stories, might relate with this Italian matrix of fairy tales, in turn related to the rich literary and folk Italian heritage. The Italian delay in forming a national state, which only came into existence in the mid-nineteenth century, delayed the unification of the Italian linguistic and narrative variety. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, foreign and Italian scholars were able to collect a wonderful and multicoloured heritage of tales, dialects and traditions. The same richness present in Italian cooking, better known than the Italian richness of fairy tales, novellas and stories, partly depends on the same delay. While this can explain the long life of this varied heritage, its origin and growth are understandable only thinking of a unique feature of Italian history. From the Neolithic to the present day Italy has influenced many other cultures as well as it has been influenced by many other cultures. We might think of Italy as of the most simultaneously colonizer and colonized country in the world, and Italians might have got from this state their worst features as well as their best ones. Let us now compare fairy tales to dreams: are they true or false? Are dreams vane illusions, deserving no attention, or do they have a divinatory character, like premonitions? Freud stated that we can study and interpret dreams as the royal road for the unconscious. Are our interpretations, coming from psychoanalytic theory, only one side of a contemporary powerful mythology, as Wittgenstein defined psychoanalysis? The Greek and Latin classics answer with myth: all dreams come from the immortals, the mortals have the chance to see them by trying to distinguish between false and truthful dreams.
We are not able to find something better, and it does not help us to better understand what to do with our dreams. Let us now spend a few lines to see the context of these verses, hoping to get something interesting from them. Penelope receives Ulysses, who, pretending to be a Cretan, gives her reassuring news about the imminent return of her husband, that is to say of himself. Penelope is moved, and she tells him that her heart shakes here and there with opposing motions: should she stay faithful to Ulysses or accept the proposal of marriage of one of her noble suitors? Then there is her son, who as a child asked her not to remarry, but now he is grown up and prays her to choose a new husband, so that her hundred and more suitors may finally vacate his palace. Finally she asks the Cretan to interpret a dream of hers: twenty ducks came out from the water to peck at her grain, and she enjoyed this; than a great eagle swooped down on them, killed them and returned to the heavens. Then Penelope cried, but the eagle came back and revealed itself to be Ulysses, who was really coming back to kill all her suitors. The false Cretan then says that there is nothing to understand, since the dream clearly revealed what is going to happen. Everything looks clear for Ulysses, whose mind is big and versatile, but Penelope reminds him that dreams are ambiguous and inexplicable, and we know that her mind is equal to that of her husband. Penelope is the quintessential faithful wife, but her dream reveals that she is happy to have so many suitors around, and also to feed them, so much so that she cries when the eagle kills them. Furthermore, we should notice that the young noble suitors of Penelope are represented by geese, animals mainly related to the female. From just eight verses we might learn that the feelings of Penelope are not simply those of an ideal wife, since she cries for the loss of her geese, which might mean her suitors as males that cannot master her, like her son Telemachus when he was still a child. There is another Greek myth that tells that Penelope mated with all her suitors while Ulysses was absent, and that she gave birth to the god Pan, the child of all (Παν, Pan, means all). Homer follows another myth; nevertheless, the dream of Penelope keeps something of a queen that does not coincide with the faithful wife par excellence. Is this dream true or false? To state the meaning of a dream as something either absolutely false or absolutely true is an arbitrary decision, and even this deceptively simple dream becomes more complex if we look at the name Penelope. A Greek myth tells that her father threw her into the water, and that a flock of ducks rescued her. The ancient Greek word penèlops was the name of a duck, and in homage to her Linnaeus gave a duck (the eurasian wigeon) the name Anas Penelope. Telling her dream to Ulisses who is pretending not to be Ulisses, Penelope speaks of eeíkosi khénes, usually translated as twenty geese. But her suitors were more than five times this number, and the word khén in Homer meant both domestic and wild ducks (Semerano, 1994). So, the ducks that Penelope can also be understood as references to her childhood. Furthermore, there are other myths about Penelope telling that she was the mother of Pan, the cloven-hoofed god. One of them says that she had conceived him with Hermes, another that she had conceived him with all her hundred and more suitors; the Greek word pàn means all. It is also told that when Ulisses came back to Ithaca, seeing this deformed creature, he set off. Night- and day-dreams are a daily experience of all of us. To study and work with something that never stands still, in a combination of stories that are both true and false, is a challenge demanding equally poetic imagination and mathematical rigor. It is a labyrinthine impossible commitment. There is a middle place, a third set, where fabulae, myths, fairy tales and dreams come from, to make our life possible and impossible. The main myths of our time are those that everything has its price in money and that science is omnipotent. Every myth gives a solution to the human condition, providing us with a key to understand reality, and this is a necessary support to collective and individual identities. There is no subject if there is no chance of finding a way to imagine reality, because this makes possible understanding it. As Salman Rushdie wrote, when a man has no longer an image of the world he becomes mad. (Shalimar the Clown, p. 297). The crux of the matter is that a myth can provide a way of drawing a map of reality, a Weltanschauung. But we must note that all this belong to a middle ground that is neither true nor false. The human tragedy comes when we act out a personal or collective myth as if it were true, making it real. Just as we cannot live without dreaming, we cannot give up all mythical maps of reality. We know that every definitive understanding of reality is false, as is any system that includes its own axioms. But we can overcome a mythical understanding of reality only by imagining a new myth, hopefully less false than the previous one. This is a scientific frame of mind. The Cartesian foundation of knowledge gives us the myth of a subject based on itself, without any need other than perceiving its doubt. If we look in fairy tales for an actant similar to the subject of Descartes, we can find it in the story of Little John and the Shudder, who has no fear, is aware of this absence and spends the entire seeking to know fear. On the countrary, in the story of Dauntless Little John, the main actant dies, having no fear and no perception of such deficiency. We do not know a more powerful myth than the Cartesian one, as we base our existence only on ourselves, giving up any warning coming from outside. The philosopher counts on the increase of knowledge that his system promises, and this is a myth like any other. The chance of meeting a Cartesian subject in person is the same of that of meeting a saint or a prophet. We can rightly name fairy tales, contes de fées and fiabe as a subset belonging to the set of fabulae, which is an immense corpus of narratives, covering all kinds of stories. Some of them were true or false and have become false or true. A correct distinction between the true and the false belongs to the conscious mind, while fabulae keep their unconscious features together with their chance to speak in a common matter of fact language. Fabulae are incubators of future truths and lies, and they receive and keep lies that once upon a time had been true. Like a living organism, the corpus of fabulae contains the seeds of new stories, which are variously related to other stories, and all of them connect to other ones. They are able to wait for centuries and millennia to come to light, keeping beasts and sleeping beauties looking dead; they lie forgotten by all, but in a blink of an eye they can awake again, when we need to tell and listen to new old stories. Fabulae do not keep the DNA of human culture, they rather preserve, so to say, the homeobox genes, sequences of genes that regulate the morphogenesis of the different living beings. We imagine the structures of fabulae, as well of fairy tales, as regulators of the numberless living tales, keepers of the various moving motifs that humankind needs to tell and listen to tales. (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.1
Storytelling and Legends |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An Ancient Craving of Parsley An ancient S. Gregory rehearseth in his dialogues that a nun entered into a garden and saw a lettuce, and coveted that, and forgat to make the sign of the cross, and bit it gluttonously, and anon fell down and was ravished of a devil. And there came to her S. Equicius, and the devil began to cry and to say: What have I done? I sat upon a lettuce and she came and bit me. And anon the devil issued out by the commandment of the holy man of God. (Jacobus de Voragine, The Golden Legend; anglicised by W. Caxton 1483) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.2 Storytelling and Enchantment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How can we neutralize the extra-mundane beeings who inhabit fairy tales? Looking at their lack of ethics and boundaries - fairies can cut off a finger merely because a girl has knocked on their door - we might be tempted to think that there are no ways of convincing them to stop bringing harm to the protagonist actants. And, when they are not harmful, they are favourable: the exta-mundane characters of fairy tales are both fas and nefas, whether they are alone in dispensing gifts and curses, or whether they multiply, as in the case of fairy tales written after the Enlightenment, when repression left ambivalence to previous centuries - or to "less enlightened" countries, such as the land of baba-yaga. Contact with a plain of existence which does not respond to waking logic is always fas and nefas, because in this plain the principle of non-contradiction is not absolute. We resist in various ways this area of the mind - and of existence itself - which is impermeable to the dictates of waking consciousness: we do all we can to stay away from this area - as in obsessive neurosis - or we enter it underestimating its otherness - as in hysteria. In the case of psychosis, cross-contamination has mixed up the cards without following a certain set of rules: a poker deck cannot be mixed up with a tarot deck. Those who instead do mix them up end up playing alone (or with a psychiatrist), following only paths set by rules which are simultaneously ironclad and changeable, just as both ironclad and changeable are the injunctions of ogres, fairies and witches. There is no better insurance for one's mental balance than frequenting with eyes wide open - when waking control extends across all plains of life - both places ruled by the logic of non-contradiction and those ruled by the ondulations of ghosts and figments of unconscious formations, which appear chaotic to the eye of consciousness. It is within the unconscious that a boulder can be dissolved and a nebula can be made solid. It is within the unconscious that chemical-magical (perhaps alchemical) reactions take place. Without these reactions, a psycho-somatic illness may simply disappear. And after all, the illness had formed within the same place or system. To allow for these transformations to take place, a psychoanalyst must give up his own mastery. May we be permitted to extend Freud's famous metaphor, drawn in turn from Hamlet, that a bait of falsehood takes a carp of truth: the analyst must first of all throw back his or her own carp of truth risking to lose it forever. Only in this way his or her desire to fish it back will give the analyst the resources he or she needs to prepare the right bait necessary for the two fishermen, as a pair, to be able to fish out the carp lost by the patient. Returning to the taming of the magical helpers/antagonists of fairy tales, I believe it is a matter of symbols; that is to say, one needs to imagine what may appease the ultramundane creature which is potentially so noxious and deadly - to divine it, not to know it, because this matter is not and cannot be an object of knowledge! In Pitrè's fairy tale Lu Re d'Amuri (The King of Love), it is sufficient to buy three coins' worth of bread from the Mamma-draga's (Mother-dragon) oven, and to dust off her ladder; in Basile's fairy tale Cat Cinderella, it is sufficient to water the date seed for three days and tend to it with a golden watering can and golden gardening hoe, and to dry it with a silken napkin. Cinderella's father and the entire ship on which he is supposed to sail cannot move because of a curse cast by his daughter: if he will forget to send Cinderella's greetings to the Dove Fairy, he will no longer be able to go neither backwards nor forward. But as soon as the father fullfills the promise he has forgotten, the invisible strenght that held the ship still disappears, and the journey begins serenely without any further impediment slowing it down. How does one fight magical creatures? And how does one obtain from the magical creatures of fairy tales the gift needed to live and grow? (AG 23/06/17) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.3
Storytelling and Geography |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alongside
realistic and authoritative descriptions, there are also
many fabulous parts. This fabulous
description of Rome, as well as many other parts of
al-Idris' masterpiece, did not decrease the authority of
the Tabula Rogeriana, which geographers copied
without alteration because it was for three centuries a
real reference point for travellers and explorers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.4 Storytelling and Religion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Believers may
have the right to kill unbelievers in the name of (their
own) One God, it is now happening in Islamic
fundamentalism, it is told in the biblical story of
Israel, and it happened in the History of Christianity.
In 1633, the Roman Catholic Inquisition condemned
Galileo Galilei for his support of heliocentrism, and
the Tuscan scientist would have been burned like
Giordano Bruno had he not abjured. Galileo knew that a
doctrine could never ever abrogate what he had learned
from experience and observation. And the foundations of the wall of the
city were garnished with all manner of precious
stones. The first foundation was jasper; the second,
sapphire; the third, a calcedony; the fourth, an
emerald; the fifth, sardonyx; the sixth, sardius; the
seventh, chrysolite; the eighth, beryl; the ninth, a
topaz; the tenth, a chrysopasus; the eleventh, a
jacinth; the twelfth, an amethyst. And the twelve
gates, were twelve pearls: every several gate was of
one pearl: and the street of the city was pure gold,
as it were transparent glass. (Apocalypse
by John, 21, 19-21) Fairy tales have in their happy ending the
same meaning and function; nevertheless, they do not
support any religion, ideology or secularism. They simply do
not care about them. They simply tell that the
main actants live happily forever after, after certain
impossible tasks or commitments, numberless
vicissitudes, persecutions, life-threatening risks.
Nevertheless, just as it is impossible to visit the
ideal city, nobody could check on the happy life of Snow White or Cinderella married with
their princes. It is unbelievable that the third wife of
the Pig King wore out seven pairs of iron shoes looking
for him (Re
porco, website Adalinda
Gasparini, Psicoanalisi e favole),
or that Sleeping Beauty
awoke still young after a century-long slumber. But
fairy tales do not require any kind of faith, since
their time and space have no direct or indirect witness.
The long chain of storytellers does not originate from
any legitimizing parent who states that they have
received a transcendental revelation from him or her. At
any rate, nobody was present to witness the beginning of
the chain. The story teller simply tells that
somebody said that another said, that once upon a time,
far away… Religions promise to the good believers
anequally vague happy ending, and their canonical
stories include unrealistic elements as do fairy tales.
They ask the believers to suspend their doubts about
miracles and the after-life with a leap of faith, credo quia absurdum
(I believe it because it is absurd). Mary conceived by
the power of the Holy Spirit and she was a virgin before
and after the delivery: this is a main
Christian dogma, and the numberless churches
dedicated to Mary, Virgin and Mother, testify its value
for the believers. In the Hindu poem Mahabharata,
the princess Kunti conceives with Surya, the Sun god,
the demigod Karna, and she is still a virgin after the
delivery. Being an unwed mother, Kunti places her baby
in a basket and sets him afloat on a river. Moses
was left to the water of the River Nile, and he was
rescued, like Karna and numberless fairy tales’ newborn
abandoned actants. Let us now remember also Oedipus,
abandoned on a mountain after his birth and adopted by
royal parents, the Greek tragic hero par excellence and
the central mythic figure of psychoanalysis. Thinking
again of fairy tales, we remember Madmatt, who
impregnated a very young princess, whom he had only seen
at her palace's window (Madmatt).
In the tale The Dying Fairy's Will, an
ogre lets the main actant sleep with his prisoner Bella
Margarita, but if they do not show him a baby born in
that night, he will kill them. They fulfil this
impossible task and the ogre runs away forever. Magic
conceptions, pregnancies and deliveries, babies left
exposed in forests or waters and regularly rescued,
recur in fairy tales, in myths and in sacred books.
These are narrative structures, corresponding to
children’s phantasies and family romances. They were
described by Freud and are well-known to psychoanalysts
an their patients, and you can easily observe them by
listening to your little children or remembering your
own childhood. Fairy tales start with opening formulas (there was once upon
a time… long, long ago…in a faraway land…) that
suspend reality. They end with closing formulas that
mark the return to everyday life. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.5 Storytelling and Science | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.6 Storytelling and History | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The myth of race persuaded previously enlightened nations to follow the Nazi-Fascist dictatorships. The certainty of a nation to be more developed than others, supported and supports all state regimes. Let us think of the Nuremberg Trials, when the Great Powers that stopped Nazi-Fascist barbarity condemned their defeated for crimes against humanity, while the Nazis tried to defend themselves declaring that they merely executed their orders. To be sure to hold the right to accuse and sentence another, requires the firm belief in one’s own moral superiority. The winners are sure that they never were and never will be guilty of similar atrocities. Nevertheless, history clearly tells us that war is always atrocious and every army, in any time, committed acts that should give cause to stop believing the story of the higher goodness of any nation. The images we daily see from today’s wars should remind us of this evidence. History magistra vitae est, history is a teacher of life, but we are rather inattentive pupils. However, we can understand the importance of storytelling, because no people would ever answer the call to arms of their rulers without the story of this people's superior civilization. (AG & CC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.7
Storytelling and Literature |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Giovanni Boccaccio devoted the last fifteen
years of his life to two works of his, The Decameron
and Genealogie deorum gentilium libri (On
the Genealogy of the Gods of the Gentiles) a
fifteen books work written in Latin, widespread in his
lifetime and for many centuries. It is the first modern
encyclopaedic study of classical myths that then were
named favole (Latin, fabulae). In the
14th book, Boccaccio celebrated poetry as a
self-sufficient form of expression, which does not need
any external aim or approval to exist. At the same time
in The Decameron
the novellas are not told to maintain or dismiss the
dominant way of thinking, first of all the religious
one, but to pass the time, waiting for the end
of the plague that made Florence an uninhabitable place.
It is not the aim of literature to create links, to witness fruitful exchanges, to cross boundaries, to favour meetings - it is an impossible commitment, like the union between Beauty and the Beast. It is not the aim of literature, but it is what literature makes imaginable and therefore possible, be it poetry, myth or fairy tale (about Diotima’s speech, see also the Lake of Generation). The
Decameron
was widely imitated in Europe for centuries with
numberles collections, we cite only The Canterbury
Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer (14th
century), and the Venetian 16th century Facetious
Nights by Giovan
Francesco
Straparola, who included among his novellas the
first fairy tales published in the world.
Nevertheless, following our perspective of the succession of generations, this is a main issue, that concerns children as well as grown ups and older people, because fairy tales tell how time can flow again, after a suspension caused by a generational conflict. The main actant walks and walks, faces impossible challenges and mortal risks, to accomplish an impossible task or escape a mortal persecution. The real time suspended by stories, of which
the alternation of different generations beats the
rythm, linking life and death, drama and comedy, flows
again when the fairy tale is over, after the white page,
when we all are again free to choose what to do with our
own imagination.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.8
Storytelling and Linguistics |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We can fruitlessly study languages, as well as fairy tales, and we cannot understand them, unless we become aware of this: every border exists only because we need to extend and fence our space, telling stories or mythicizing about a superior right to be its owners, giving us the right to exclude the other, inferior - as we state - to us. Our Greek fathers taught us the democracy, but also the exclusion of the other, who, speaking a different language was βάρβαρος (bárbaros), stutterer. This classical heritage is not enough, as well as it is not enough the development of identity based on the opposition to the other, which means to be males because we are not females, heterosexuals because we are not homosexuals, or vice versa: better because opposed to the worse, higher because compared to the lower, or vice versa, because of language, religion, clothes, history. Isn't it a story? Science could favour a lay ethics, proceeding in the opposite direction of the myth of one’s own fixed superiority, but the work we should do is so much, and the goal is so far that we need a utopian mood to try it. Our pages aim to deleterious ideologies developing into racism, those that in ancient times divided Indo-European peoples and very ancient non-Indo-European peoples, between us, Arian rulers, and Semitics, “inferior ethnic stock”. We highlighted elsewhere that race comes from the Assyrian ḫaršâ (horse breeding, as well as in the city of Ḫa-ar-šu). The treacherous etymologies dared to perch on the place of History. We hear the sound of local fighting between peoples from which we repeat our first cultural lights. It is the perennial complex of Cain. Nevertheless, later on we moved away those contentions and we burnt the continents. If the so-called mighty of the Earth would have the habit to attend the great temple of History, the world would be less blood-soaked and less wet with tears. (Giovanni Semerano, La favola dell'indoeuropeo, Premessa quasi moralistica, ma non troppo", p. ix [The Myth of Indo-European Language. Preface almost moralistic but not too much. ]; our translation). Giovanni Semerano highlighted the fact that the firm belief of a particular and superior human stock, that in our case is the Indo-European one, is a tale, a story, a myth. However, it is a dazzling habit, which concerns all cultural identities; therefore, thinking of the others as better than us is the complementary opposite of the idea that they are worse. It is quite useless to exchange superiority with inferiority or vice versa; we should - simply! - give up the idealization of ourselves – which entails the demonization of the other – without demonizing our cultural identity idealizing the other's one. Fairy tales, like myths, can help us, on condition that we consider them as a new ancient moving labyrinth of true and false paths, to loose and find ourselves, to ask questions more than finding answers. "Stories can knit the world together; stories can blow the world apart: the choice is always ours" (Tabish Khair, private mail). (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.9
Storytelling and Education |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nyx and Hemèra, Night and Day, were in the Greek myth two sisters, living in the same house, but never being there together. When a sister went out, her sister came in, just brushing the other. Every kind of sleeplessness, beginning with the child’s trouble to fall asleep, swings on the mystery of these alternations. We do not know where we are when we are sleeping, when we are moving our eyes to follow images that are only on our mind, as if we were looking at a movie. We do not know why we can feel intense sensations of fear or pleasure, when there is nothing unusual in our sleeping room. Every parent knows how it may be difficult to reassure children scared by darkness, and how it is hard to answer their questions about death, when one of their known persons or pets disappear. Parents usually notice that children cannot truly realize what death may be, but they should not forget that they too cannot realize how it can be possible that only a moment ago a living being whom we love were with us, while this creature has left us forever after. The waking consciousness, which lets us
speaking, hearing, giving and receiving, immerses itself
somewhere, we do not know where, like the setting sun
beyond the horizon. It rises again in the morning, as
long as we are living, and it will rise again after
death, if we are believers. A wish for immortality, so
told Diotima to Socrates, makes all living beings in
love, with their offspring above all else. Their
offspring is something similar to them that they leave
after themselves, to the future where they are not
admitted (see Lake of Generation).
The border of waking consciousness, of day, of life, and
the border of unconscious sleep, of night, of death,
goes up to and from each other, and when we feel that
they brush themselves, we know the odd, uncanny (unheimliche)
shudder, those goose bumps that a fairy tale's actant
looked for (Little John and the
Shudder). Another Little John, who never was
afraid but did not miss the shudder, died as soon as he
saw his own shadow. The uncanny touch of light with
darkness were fatal to him (Dauntless
Little John). This is the space of fairy tales, the same
space that the Fairy Map of Succession invites
you to explore, to stop and reflect, to make room for
thoughts, which do not grow only in the forms that
parents and educators, or yourself, can foresee and
approve. Fairy tales weave their thin veil between the
borders of watch and sleep, of darkness and light, of
serene joy to live and mortal anguish, of Night and Day.
Their material is elastic, it does not work if the two
borders move away from each other, but as soon as we go
and look for it, we can easily find it again. Pedagogists can give many reasons to tell children many fairy tales, or reasons not to do it. We think that these reasons are not in fairy tales, because they depend on our choice. Nonetheless, fairy tales do not make or put any resistance to pedagogical reasons or psychoanalytic interpretation of every trend. We could build a gallery of fairy tales settled into fascinating interpretations, or turned into precious or harmful tools for parents and educators. It would be an interesting gallery, which could tell how wise philanthropists and bloody dictators made use of the same tales, and how Snow White or Cinderella can take on Arian, exotic or Disney features. Nevetheless, no fairy tale would never ever choose that gallery as its residence, because fairy tales move themselves like the wind, which does not know any border and reap scents and miasmas from the lands and the seas that it goes through. We hope that to explore Fabulando
may strengthen your sensibility for the art of
storytelling, which you already know going to see our
tales through the Fairy Map of Succession, and,
moreover, other tales written in the collections that we
quote in our Bibliography,
variously linked to ours. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.11. Storytelling and ATU, Aarne-Thompson-Uther Index | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
penetration of the fundamental structures of being (die
Grundstructuren des Daseins) has not occurred, but a
reflection on these structures is preliminary.
Understanding their elusiveness does not authorize us to
forget that to repress the lesson of Sein und Zeit
means estranging oneself from one's own time. Remembering
it humbles us and forces us to be honest. If you never
thought about this ontological question you should
remember it while giving at least a scan of the ATU index.
It is fleetingly mentioned everywhere one speaks of fairy
tales, but its only utility is to make you feel guaranteed
by its ponderous and secular existence. It is usually forgotten the author of the first classification of fairy tales, which inspired Anti Amatus Aarne (Verzeichnis der Märchentypen, Helsinki 1910), expanded by Stith Thompson (1932-1937and 1961) who brought it to six volumes, eventually enriched by Hans-Jörg Uther (2004). The first inventor of this kind of classification was a real Cinderella of fairy tale studies, Marian Roalf Emily Cox, briefly mentioned or not even mentioned by the ATU scholars. She published only one book – a Cinderella who disappeared after only one ball. She was forced to publish her book by Andrew Lang, king of the Folklore Society of London, and there is no mention of a prince who invited her to dance. We have no news of her, apart from the wonderful and pioneering Cinderella studio: Three hundred and forty-five variants of Cinderella, Catskin and Cap o' Rushes, abstracted and tabulated, with a discussion of mediaeval analogues, and notes. (Published for the Folklore Society, London 1893). If his majesty Andrew Lang would not have forced her to publish her book, M.E.R. Cox could have received other first-hand variants collected by scholars from all over the world. What we know about her book and her research comes only from her only book and from the Introduction of her master Andrew Lang. We have no other news about her, may be she left her research to take care of her elderly parents. The relationship between her classification and indexing of fairy tales and Aarne Index is evident, and the total lack of attention toward her book is one of the many forgetfulness of the contribution of women in the field of culture. We must eventually observe that Cox needed a classification to organize her huge number of variants of Cinderella, Catskin and Cap o'Rushes; this was necessary to show similarities and differences among these variants of the three kinds of stories that she had received from all over the world. We are in touch with an Italian Scholar who first translated Cinderella, three hundred and forty-five variants... ,but her translation is still unpublished. We invited her to host her work here in Fabulando, and we hope to do it as soon as possible. About the ATU classification we remember that V. J. Propp noted that the chosen criteria did not give any guarantee of meaning to the index, assigning the same classification to different fairy tales and tales and different codes to fairy tales of the same type. We quoted some words by Heidegger for the precision with which he dismisses without appeal any empty and voluminous repertoires such as the ATU Index. We dare to take advantage of his rifle which has a firepower so much higher than ours. A digression: we would like that the the fire of the German philosopher could strike the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) too. We however doubt that this may happen, even if his gun has the philosophical biggest firepower in twentieth century. Nothing changes if Vladimir Jakovlevič Propp would reinforce the rifle of Heidegger with his valiant bayonet, even if we think that the Russian scholar could have trigger the French structuralism. Returning to our Fabulando, writing this lines we have only a blowgun, and paper bullets without any poison. We know that we could at best produce a nuisance equal to the bite of a mosquito. We are however comforted by the intimacy of feeling with many other hunters of sense, and their lesson helps us to bear both the fatigue and the slowness in the diffusion of what we are painstakingly and happily discovering. It helps us also to bear that what we often find has already been discovered and told. (AG, March 10, 2023) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.11. Storytelling and Psychoanalysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Let us think of human beings as of instruments. Parents would be their first musicians, who touching them listen to their first sounds. There is much music, excellent voice, in that little organ, and a little bit resounds in their weeping, their smile and their first words. Parents try to perform the best kind of music they know, and when they hear an unknown cluster, they modify it, to enrol it in their score. New musicians, the subjects, soon emerge, immediately trying to play their own music. They have to agree with parents and family, then with their little friends and schoolmates, with schoolteachers, then with lovers, colleagues, neighbours and employers… They can make good music if they are able to touch their own keys by themselves, tuning themselves to others, if they want to be able to perform a solo, and to play in duets, trios and in orchestras. Like all good musicians, the subjects train every day to express themselves and tune to others, until their body, their instruments, which appeared at birth, disappear. Nevertheless, the music of every human being, be it conventional or revolutionary, harmonic or dissonant, continues to resonate beyond their instrument’s existence, for a little time or for a long one. Who are the musicians that go on playing their music even for centuries and millennia? So who is ringing the bells of Rome? (above quoted) Going on with this metaphor, let us distinguish the instrument, the body that is visible from birth to death, from the musician, the subject. We know the presence of the wind, as well as of the subject, through the visible effects of its breath. It is this invisible blow displaying its persistence even if the instrument disappears, beyond death. Religions call it the immortal soul, believing in its existence after death, or even before birth. We know the subject, and the subject knows itself, since it gives evidence of its own existence. Nevertheless, it fades and stops, normally in the daily sleep, and often it does not understand itself, being anxious or upset. We are the work of a fine instrument-maker: some Stradivarius sui generis, who is no longer here to repair us. (Frederic Chopin). While believers have faith in a supernatural maker who perfectly knows their instrument and has given them their immortal breath, Chopin complains about this fine maker’s absence. Being an atheist, not thinking of a omnipotent maker, means not thinking of a totally knowable instrument. It also means questioning oneself on the issue of the subject, without expecting to get a solution. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Hamlet’s fake friends, could never pluck out the heart of his mystery, which remains inaccessible for the subject himself. Nevertheless, there is something that we know: the need and desire of the subject to play its own rhythm and music, which is unique even if it reminds us of other songs and symphonies. We also see that subjects can make good music if they play with other musicians, tuning their instrument together with them. If we think of music like a story, at our birth we are a tale beginning with us, first told by others, then by ourselves, then still by others and by ourselves, together with others. Regardless of whether an immortal soul exists or not, the living beings are the sole owners of the stories told by those who left this world. They inherit it, doing whatever they like with it. They can retell stories, myths and fairy tales that others already told; moreover, their Author, the one who invented a tale out of nothing, can exist only in theory. We have many stories, so many that it is impossible to count them, and no catalogue could ever order them without violating their variety, Moreover, there are always new tales which resemble the previous ones just as children resemble their parents and do not replicate them. What else are stories, but a music written and performed, recorded or lost, recovered and rewritten, always collected and changed from generation to generation? Stories come from parents to children, but also from people to people, through friendly exchanges or fierce clashes, They are vehicles for the migrations and transformations of stories.
Just as skilled musicians can play their instrument making music that others like to listen to, the clever storytellers - be they Agatuzza Messia (the Sicilian oral storyteller who told many tales to Giuseppe Pitrè) or Giambattista Basile - tell their stories in such a way that not only their contemporaries listen to them, but also future generations, even for centuries, under different skies. Their stories cross time and space boundaries, through various languages and means of transmission, and by changing they remain the same, reaching so many listeners that the illiterate storyteller of Pitrè or the Neapolitan great writer could not even dream of. Working on Fabulando we thought of honouring them, making their fairy tales available both as they told them, and with a parallel text, to facilitate their enjoyement by a wider audience. We do not know if those storytellers would like our work, nonetheless we have the same right to their fairy tales as descendants have to their parent’s inheritance. Human beings, like musicians or storytellers, embark with their instrument on a psychoanalytic journey when they suffer becouse they do not feel like they are being listened to, being so unhappy about their tune and the way in which other people try to play them. Their wish is to change the tune. If this change fascinates them more than anything else, their journey can also lead them to become psychoanalysts. Then, throughout their professional life, they listen to notes, motifs and patterns that outside their office had never found a listener, even unknown by the musician who decided to play with the analyst. The psychoanalysts listens the other’s music, and their own instrument silently resounds, like a tuning fork vibrates together with another one. If they are educated enough, they can be afraid, baffled, upset, admired or disgusted, but, rather then stop listening, they will go on vibrating with the other, maintaining their ethics and profession. They follow the desire for this to be music, a song or a symphony, pop or folk, so that the musician will perform or sing in his/her own real life what first resounded in that office, varying it according to his/her own desire. A night dream hints at a motif, gives it up, seemingly plays another one, it leads to focus and get distracted, it may mean everything and nothing. Provided that the dream means something for the duet which improvises on the score of that dream, in the blink of an eye all this turns into good proper music. We do not look for Stradivari, we do not complain about the lack of an almighty maker, there can be only music, be it fragmentary, repetitive, dissonant, a motif insignificant at first glance and then, sometimes, amazing. The patients have experienced in their life many reactions to their own music, of complicity or distrust, of appreciation or devaluation, from others and also from themselves. Now they discover that someone is listening to them without judging them. The psychoanalysts can listen to the other thanks to their training, that is daily and never ending, just like that of the musician’s. Thanks to this infinite training, they should be able to feel the other’s touch on their own keys, and thanks to their theoretical references, they can guess a whole sheet of music just by listening to odd clusters. Affects, drives, emotions and memories of every colour and intensity resound in their office, but everyday life goes on outside their door, where the patients leave it as soon as they enter the office, to find it again when they go out. The psychoanalysts do not follow their patients in their daily life, and the patients can always stop coming to play in that office; it may happen, when they unilaterally stop the analytic work, as well as when two musicians agree to dissolve their duo, but it rarely happens. This double metaphor of music and tales, aims to introduce the psychoanalytic passion for fairy tales, which is the primary thread of Fabulando. The Sixty-seven stories of Fabulando belong to the fairy-tale genre, which was first published in Venice, 16th century (Straparola) and had its first collection in Napoli, 17th century (Basile), to spread all over Italy and Europe, both among illiterate people and great writers, like Perrault and the Grimm Brothers. We do not open the immense chapter about the Eastern influences on the constitution and the increase of this heritage; nevertheless, the prevalent form of fairy tales remains the European one, established from the 16th century. It is a form that does not ask any external justification for the narrative itself, which in its turn does not justify or solve anything. This form neither explains reality, nor helps anybody to accept it; it does not suggest virtuous or effective behaviours, nor does it tell what is possible or impossible, but through its opening and ending formulas. Therefore, it can wind itself among accelerations and decelerations, metamorphoses and spells, bodies and landscapes, unrealistic and realistic relations. We can immerse ourselves in a fairy tale like in a psychoanalytic room: our real life is outside, waiting for us at the end of the session and at the end of the tale, when we do not forget that no magic alteration of distances, times and bodies is now possible. The most popular Italian ending formula tells: “the threshold is narrow / the way is wide / it’s time for your tale / I have just told mine” (stretta la soglia / larga la via / dite la vostra, che ho detto la mia). The story told by a storyteller to a listener who shares the same wonder, turns again into the story belonging to the narrator, leaving his listener to his speech, his story, his own music. There is thus an analogy that we are trying to develop by linking psychoanalysis with fairy tales, which we see as stories able both to say and not to say what is true and what is false. Do they mix them? No, they draw from a level of meaning where they are not separated, even though they take part in some way in the separation between true and false, possible and impossible, real and unreal. This level of meaning is unconscious, therefore it is unknowable. It is a postulate, but nevertheless it marks itself by producing perceptible effects, just like the wind, just like the subject. We take care of its effects, and although we still do not see the wind or the psyche, we have a lot to do, and we know that we should work with the utmost rigor. Let us now come back to Fabulando, our project to offer fairy tales, because we think of them as of bridges, mediators between oneself and the other, between the absurd dwelling in ourselves and the understandable map we draw to live together with others, generation after generation. Fairy tale after fairy tale, step by step, without a definitive plan, almost erratically, we try to talk about this. The key concept of succession links our fairy tales without binding them, only to make them resonate with each other. We chose the concept of succession bringing into play the issue of Oedipus, the Greek tragic hero par excellence, whose tragedy Freud chose to describe the core of human experience.An urgent, essential task: to make a logic of the absurd. Succession entails life and death together, when an old generation leaves its heritage and a young generation receives it. Human beings overcome death through death, because while parents die, their children keep their heritage. This issue cannot be simple, and not even an utopian equipe of the best scholars from all disciplines could ever exhaust it. Subjects think of themselves as infinite, but they know that they have had a beginning and will have an end: nothing can change these limits. How could this reality ever be a simple one? Succession after succession, step by step, our fairy tales tell that this is a movement, where those actants who are willing to take risks, the wandering subjects, go ahead with their own desire and may perform music together with other creatures. There is much music, excellent voices, in these little tales, and a little echo for each single musician. Finally, a girl comes to my mind to end this note about psychoanalysis and fairy tales, a girl that I met working in a school, many years ago. After I had told a story, while the children were retelling it, writing or drawing, their Italian teacher pointed to her, whispering that she never did any work, because she had problems - of course I had realized this, the teacher told to me. Then teacher urged her to speak, but the girl kept silent, without writing or drawing anything. Then, one day, in that same class, I told a tale by Straparola, The Beautiful Prisoner Lady. Three brothers leave their poor father to go and seek their fortune. Thanks to the supernatural or magic skills they have learned, they return home with many treasures and a beautiful princess, who had been imprisoned in a tower. They divide a treasure of golden coins and precious jewels into four parts, but each of them claims the beautiful prisoner for himself: Straparola tells that they failed to agree, and thus they brought the matter before a court. But the judge too was unable to resolve the matter, so he left it to another judge, who was also unable to take a decision, and so on. Therefore, the matter is still before the court. Straparola ends the story addressing his readers to take a decision. "So, which is the solution?" asked me a pupil. I answered: "I do not know. What do you think about it?". So, the pupils gave their solution: some of them said that the father should have married the beautiful princess, to complete the family once again, others gave the princess to one son or another, depending on the part they had performed in her rescue. Eventually a girl said that they should have asked her to choose among them. Then I made them notice that in the tale the lady never says a word. When they asked me why, I answered that I did not know it: what did they think about this? So they wrote their answers, and when later I read their short reflections by myself, I saw that the silent girl in the class had finally said a word. In a few lines filled with grammatical mistakes which overlay her consciousness with that of the princess from the fairy tale, she had touched her keys together with us and could give a reason for the princess' and her own silence:
She was and was not the beautiful princess, and thanks to this at once false and true reality, she began - and did not stop - to speak. (Regarding these experiences of mine with schoolchildren, see also Gasparini 1997 and 1999) (AG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Another one...
another one... another one...
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Another one... another one... another one... Again, another story, another fairy tale; then a more complex and amazing story; then a novel; right when our storyteller is a writer, insubstantial as dreams, right when we are falling asleep. What is that odd phenomenon, when the storyteller falls asleep before the children, when we go on telling, but our words are out of place and the plot fades? As a child, my son called me back with a light touch, saying, "Mamma, mamma, that was not how the story went..." Sofia, my granddaughter, who is eight years old, calls me back with the same light touch, "Nonna, nonna! What on earth are you saying?” Ettore, her brother, two and a half years old, until recently asked for nursery rhymes and songs, but now he listens to fairy tales together with his sister, and when I come back from my little sleep, I see him looking at me with that same attention. The storyteller comes back in a blink of an eye, I smile and I start to tell the story properly again. I remember the intrigued and astounded look of my child, I see my grandchildren's intrigued and amused looks facing my slip up; I felt, I feel as if they have caught me out, but just for a few moments. What is it? Maybe it depends on mirror neurons, which might induce our odd sleep to fulfil our whish of putting children to sleep, so they will stop engaging us body and soul... The commitment required by the child almost forces us to forget ourselves: maybe something rescues us from them, sending us to sleep against our will... We know for sure that that compelling tiredness disappears as soon as children fall asleep. Nevertheless, all this is still difficult to explain. The storyteller is captivated by his own spell, which causes him to break off his watch, and there is no connection with either an excessive tiredness or a particular wish to go back to one's own occupation. Moreover, where does the oneiric director come from, he who takes control of the stage and of the place of storyteller, in order to arrange characters, plots and words in their rightful places, and in order to play another seemingly inane scene? As if spellbound, the whole story enters his service, following odd rules. But this rambling new sentence fades away as soon as the child calls us back, leaving just a trace of its presence. Maybe he comes from the moving about of actors and stage hands from the set where we are telling a tale and our children are listening to it, towards the one belonging to sleeping and dreaming, where all of the troupe stays behind. But behind what? Brain, neurons? Moreover, what trick-fond demiurge makes our eyes move while we dream, as if following a real scene, or a film playing out in front of us? Where are we looking with our eyes shut? What on earth is the meaning of our gaze moving right and left, while our eyes are veiled by our eyelids? We should keep in mind this paradox, which is apparently harmless, but nonetheless real, and similar to that of the voices heard by the schizophrenic subject, who perceives them as more real than reality. Sofia and Ettore, like their father before them, are alone when I, their storyteller, fall asleep, and it is up to them to pronounce a sensible waking word to call me back. I would think that their astounded, intrigued or amused curiosity shows that they are independent subjects who draw strength from our slip up. If we are not here any more, they nonetheless are, just like they will be here when we will shut our eyes forever. As the Italian psychoanalyst Elvio Fachinelli wrote many years ago, psychoanalysis is dangerously shifting from being a science of questions towards becoming a science of answers. We can see, so to speak, many psychoanalysts going hand in hand with a sphinx-like automaton manufactured by themselves, bearing the sygil of the school they belong to. This sphinx is ready to solve any riddle. We would be fools to think that the sphinx - posing riddles and holding by the throat anyone unable to answer - died when Oedipus solved her riddle. She merely faked suicide by rushing into the abyss. Mythic beings cannot die, since they are not alive, just like dreams moving through the maze of our brain with its nets of neurons, forcing us to move our eyes in order to follow them. We think that the apparent suicide of the sphinx means that she freed up the road to Thebes, and that no ancient monster forbids us to get to the city - the oikumene - any longer. Nevertheless, she continues to question us from the abyss in which we fall every night, which has an ending and at the same time is bottomless. Our children have not yet learned the ingenious trick or gimmick which would allow them to put up with the reality of the absence of those they love. This is why they need us near them when they go to sleep, this is why they are afraid of the dark, this is why they weep and call us after a nightmare. If the abyss in which the Sphinx disappeared stops us from thinking and acting, we cannot grow up. This abyss is associated with the human condition, with its succession of various ages and generations. Nevertheless, if we convince ourselves that this abyss does not exist, so that we are unaware of the sphinx's questions which echo during the day, we may well be grown-ups, but we are useless for ourselves and for others. To forget the sphinx means falling into the abyss, and since unlike the Sphinx we are mortal beings, if we fall into the abyss we might die. The Sphinx is the guardian of both the closed and the open road, of both the insurmountable hindrance, and of that which we can overcome. She proves the existence of a logic that is absurd for the Ego, but which is nonetheless just as true and effective as waking logic. A Sphinx, just as small as the Nardiello's singing cricket, appears in the blink of an eye as the third actant between the grow-ups asthey fall asleep, and the children who wake them up to get their storyteller back. The fairy tale continues, and the vagueness of the Sphinx gives way to the vagueness of Donkey-Skin who wears clothes of sun and moon. Her amazing clothes are both there and not there, because they travel underground with a beauty in disguise. The odd (unheimliche) discontinuity of our moods corresponds in fairy tales to the metamorphosis of Nardiello, from a wretch thrown into the lion's den, to the legitimate husband of the Crown Princess. Moreover, this implies a change in his look that dwarfs the wonders of our cosmetic surgery. The fading of the boundaries of space and time that we regularly experience in our dreams, hoping to never experience the delusions of madness or dementia, are reflected in fairy tales. Flower is a poor girl harassed by her stepmother, but dividing into twelve pieces her cake in order to please twelve fairies is enough to give her hair from which fall gold and pearls, and flowers blossoming on her mouth every time she says a word. Spells have two directions, so that seven brothers become seven little pigeons as soon as their younger sister grasps a branch of rosemary from the ogre's pit. Then, after many adventures, the pigeons turn back into seven beautiful boys. The fairy tale, unlike the dream, unlike the Sphinx, and unlike the classical myth, always tells us that something might appear to us if we begin to look for it and continue in our search, because we cannot live without it. We have to go and look for it even if we do not know where it is, when we will find it, and even what it might be. All we know is that we need this thing in order to reverse a negative spell, or in order to free ourselves or others from a curse. In Fabulando we collected these original curses, from which all stories begin. Our criterion for this collection is the metaphor of the succession - without of course forgetting that the passage of goods and debts between generations is a very real issue that concerns everyone, both individually and collectively. We too try to understand the meaning of these precious phenomena, such as talking animals, fairies, ogres, plants who speak through their a mouth made of bark, like the oak in the tale of The Seven Little Pigeons, or almonds and hazelnuts that, breaking at the right moment, give wonderful jewels. We do not consider it useless to investigate their symbolic value. Even in Fabulando, we offer some interpretations of this kind. Nevertheless, what is more important for us is their subtle, negligible substance, which is easier to ignore than to observe, easier to discard as insignificant than to take and keep as our treasure, as did Adamantina and Nardiello, who gave all they had to get the Pooavola doll and the cockroach, the mouse and the cricket. When I recall the look on my child's face, many years ago, and now that of his children, when they call me back from that irresistible sleepiness of mine, I think that fairy tales are useful to the extent in which they say that nothing should be overlooked, because we might find our treasure in an almond or it might be given us by a cricket. A ragamuffin might show us the way, as might even a little fox, an oak and an ant, or a ball of thread that we throw in a clearing to find the right direction, following the advice of the older brother of three very old brothers. When nothing and no one helps you to get out of a disastrous situation, try to experience something new. There might be something around you, if you look very carefully, if you have the same delicate strength that, as a child, made you wake the sleeping storyteller, who came back thanks to your attention. Often, the only one who is awake is the child. Again... and again... and again... let this wish not to fall into the abyss be never ending, let us slip into sleep as gently as possible. In this way, we may wake up in the morning with something new. This comes from waking, but during our waking hours it remains repressed. It could offer a valuable help, awareness of a pain or a need that can not emerge. The sublime, the aesthetic category transcending the separation between good and bad, between desirable and execrable, has an uncertain but fascinating etymology, sub-limen (Latin), below the threshold. Stretta la soglia, larga la via, / dite la vostra, che ho detto la mia (The threshold is narrow, the road is wide, tell your story, I just told mine), is a common closing formula of Italian folktales. The threshold is a line to be crossed, dividing the life of the day and of the night, which are spaces made of countless rooms, plains, mountains, seas and rivers, such as those of our little Fairy Map of Succession. Nevertheless, the essence of our human presence depends, so to say, on how we cross the threshold, which is the discontinuity that we experience every day, not only in the transition between wakefulness and sleep. We experience it when a violent emotion, like anger or passion, shakes us and makes us both fly and fall, when uneasiness and wellbeing come to us without us knowing why, when our memories form and transform themselves, eclipsing and shining again. Storyteller and listener are near the threshold, speaking and listening to each other. The threshold is a line, it is not a place, and we have to cross it, not dwell in it. It has no thickness, as in Euclidean geometry, it resembles dreams, but we need it to separate, to distinguish, and to espy experience. When the storyteller falls asleep, when he suddenly falls into the abyss, children call him back, because they have already experienced enough thresholds to know that it is possible to cross them in either direction, just as you can get from ogres and fairies both gifts and harm. Nevertheless, this aptitude of children, and of each subject, to wake those who should take care of them, this ability to tolerate their sudden eclipse, cannot go on but briefly. In order not to be strangled by the Sphinx, first we need nursery rhymes, then fairy tales, then long and amazing tales like those of the Arabian Nights, then a good novel. Another one... another one... another one... Now we have to leave many unanswered questions and publish our work with its many imperfections, gaps, errors. Finally, we must confess that this is an unfinished work. Fabulando's collection initially included thirty-eight fairy tales. Since then we have added over time other new fairy tales: they are now Sixty-seven, and this number may rise again. Often, we have had to remake the maps and e-books of these tales, as well as the maps of the other fairy tales of the same injunction, so as to include the new titles. Thus, we changed the maps of injunctions and quadrants, and then we mapped these images again with the links that allow you to surf Fabulando with a click or a touch, light and quick like magic. Then we reloaded everything online - the e-books, html files and images, and finally we had to correct the many mistakes occurring in these operations. Then we become aware that we, narrators and listeners at the same time, were going on just like children, asking for and getting another fairy tale, one more... one more... one more.... Leaving something we have worked on is not like falling asleep. It is a change of state. The fruit of our work, as long as we can improve and change it, is still ours. When we consider it concluded, although it is the first expression of a project that will remain open, we make it go out into the world alone, like a child who starts going to school, or like a teenager who drives a motorbike for the first time or travels alone across Europe. Then our wealth, which however small and defective is so precious for us, might fail, disappear and vanish. Better to keep it close, to improve it, to enrich it. Another one... another one... another one... However, we have to let it go, and hope, or pray. The sphinx tries to strangle those who cross the threshold too soon, as well as those who hesitate for fear. The baby needs to stay nine months inside the womb; if it remains longer, it is in danger, as well as if it prematurely leaves it. The child needs to sleep. The child needs to stay awake. The adult sometimes falls asleep in its place, but fairy tales and novels allow both of them to find each other again. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fabulando by
Claudia Chellini &
Adalinda Gasparini is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
4.0 International License.
|